'Adam,' said he, You alone have 66 66 66 were alarmed. The soldiers rushed in, all was noise and confusion. I felt then compunction for what I had done, and endeavoured to stop the slaughter, but in vain. At a distance I saw Ulysses, with his troops, making tremendous havock. As he approached me, instead of the Ithacensian hero, it was Adam Earnest. "Adam," said I, as he hobbled by me, sheathed in armour, with a tall plume in his helmet, "What is the matter with you?" He made no reply, but by a stern look, and flourishing his sword, exclaimed to his soldiers, "Be men, O Grecians, and revenge the blood of the great Achilles, and of the heroes who have fallen in the war." So saying, he passed by me, and mingled in the crowd. As soon as I left him, I met Paris, "Villain Paris," exclaimed I, “turn and meet your fate." So saying, I struck him a violent blow with my sword, and awoke from fictitious war to real tumult. My little dog, upon hearing me call Paris, which is his name, had discharged a violent blow on his head During our conversation, we had left the ruin, and had by this time nearly got to the town, and after a few minutes more, we arrived at my apart-put his paws on my knee, and I had ments. I entered, and invited the old man in with me: we walked into my little parlour: the fire was burning bright, my candle lighted on the table, and my little dog lying on the hearth. I desired Mrs. Mannil, my landlady, to procure some ale for the old man, which he soon drank, and left me to my cogitations. I had long since given over suppers; in lieu of which, I gene- ON THE SHADES OF DIFFERENCE IN THE rally read some passages out of a good author, and digested them with a whiff of tobacco. I lighted my pipe, and stretching out my hand to my book case, took down my Virgil, and began to read that part of the Second Book of the Eneid, where Eneas describes the sacking of Troy. I had been very much engaged during the former part of the day, and I rather apprehend that this was the cause, that very soon after I had sat down, I fell asleep, and dreamt that the following curious occurrence happened to me. HUMAN CHARACTER. MR. EDITOR. SIR,-I should be much obliged if you would insert the following Essay in your entertaining Magazine. I am, Sir, &c. HENRY JOHNSTONE. IN characters that bear the greatest resemblance to each other, the skilful eye can easily trace well-marked and distinct features of difference. Consider the human species where we will, I thought that the eventful night, of we shall always observe a peculiar which I had been reading, was return- cast of mind distinguishing every part ed, and that I was a principal actor of it. The similarity of occupations in those scenes; I descended the and interests, which consolidates a wooden fabric, which looked to me number of persons into one plan of more like a ship than a horse. I action, cannot, even though it conlighted my torch; and, sheathed in re- tinues to operate for a considerable fulgent_armour, rushed to the first period, entirely efface the impression house I saw, and set it on fire. set upon us at our births by the formThe flames rose, and the inhabitantsing hand of nature. Were we to asso ciate two children from their tenderest | pre-direction of our faculties which we years, in a fellowship of amusements cannot control. and pursuits, and constantly endeavour to induce a belief that they were to remain thus united throughout, there would nevertheless, I am persuaded, be found in the physiognomy of their souls a very perceptible contrast, both as to colouring and formation. Look as narrowly as we may among our fellow creatures, we shall find none of them twins in every circumstance; there may be a general, but there cannot be a perfect similitude. Premising thus then, it should seem, that to a certain extent singularity forms a part in the composition Born with us, our companions in the cradle and in the nursery, they must continue unconquerably active, even to the conclusion of our sojourning on earth. Arbitrary habits cannot destroy them, nor the attacks of adversity shake them off: we may strive to flee them, but they will follow us as the shadow the body; we may use efforts to dispossess them of our bosoms, but they will maintain their empire till the frail fleshy coil is mingled with the original dust. MR. EDITOR. Poetry." SIR,-You will oblige one of the readers of your Magazine, by inserting the following Remarks on a paper that appeared in the number for April, 1822, (col. 338,) entitled "An Essay on Modern Poetry." of us all. Indeed, were it otherwise, Remarks on "An Essay on Modern a disgusting sameness would prevail in every link of the mental chain. We should proceed from century to century in the dull and confined walk of our ancestors, without once desiring to deviate from the beaten track with the daring step of originality. Genius would then be fettered in its exercise; the charms of novelty would fail to give it expansion; and the yet unattained summits of glory, be barren of attraction. Now, as every soul is formed in a mould, in some particular peculiar to itself, there is, by consequence, an ardent inclination to fathom the unfathomed, and exceed the unexceeded, always active. There is a predisposing impulse in every human breast, that will eventually conduct, though many stumblingblocks should intervene, to the point of its decision. It is in vain to attempt to alter the work of the Supreme Architect, for though it be possible to ruin it, it is impossible to reform or better its constitution. Education, it has been said, may effect much, and this I have never doubted. It can afford to uninformed genius, instruction as to the best route of that journey it thirsts to commence, by setting before it the collected labour of ages, the glorious results of foregone wisdom, and the inestimable treasures handed down to posterity from the ancient world. It can doubtless marshal its ideas, and give them a regularity essential to success; but I deny that it can at all amend the previous bias of the mind. The powerful prepossessions which we so tenaciously cherish the as powerful antipathies which we cannot overcome-prove a Your's, respectfully, Bucks, May 3d, 1822. SIGMA. То IN offering a few remarks on the spirited paper referred to above, I shall begin by observing that I agree in general with G. M. in his sentiments respecting poetry. The present race of poets stands justly chargeable with the literary crime of sacrificing every thing to effect, or rather to eclat. startle, surprise, and astonish,-to torture the feelings with violent language, monstrous characters, and distressing accidents, and to lead the reader on in breathless expectation, from one scene to another, to some disastrous conclusion, seems to be the object of the fashionable bard, rather than to create what is beautiful and abiding, and which, like the harmonies of nature, is ever the same, but always lovely. Our contemporary poetical authors produce in the minds of their readers, strong sensations, which are directly forgotten; like some popular preachers, who stoop to vulgar tricks to excite the feelings of their auditors, without that genuine eloquence which wins over the understanding, and persuades the will. I agree with G. M. in thinking that it requires more thought and more imagination to make common objects interesting in their natural colours, and unexaggerated forms, than to awaken attention to what is wild and romantic; and that success in the former is the true test of fine poetical genius. The pure inspirations of nature, the transparent stream of imagination, whose clear bottom shews the precious stones of thought and wisdom richly spread, is a manifestation of a far more exalted genius, than the skill shown in narrating the wonders of some tale, the materials of which are easily found. I can also cheerfully subscribe to G. M.'s opinion of Wordsworth, by far the most original and imaginative, and, in a word, the most poetical poet of the present age, and indeed, with a very few exceptions, of any other. But I think G. M. has treated our modern bards with injustice. Let him reprobate their taste as much as he pleases, but let him not deny them (for his silence does) powerful and enchanting genius. Scott, Southey, Byron, and Moore, have committed faults; but they are more splendid and poetical in their faults, than many admitted English poets are in their most accurate and elaborate passages. For my part, I would plead for no exclusive taste in poetry; the romantic has its charms as well as the classical, and it will always be popular with the greatest number of readers. The romantic poetry of England is infinitely preferable to the correct and cold declamation of the French poets, who avoid every thing romantic in poetry, tanquam scopuli. May our poets go on romancing to the end of the world, rather than turn back to the insipid prettiness, and endless self-imitation, of the school founded by Boileau and Pope. As we have no reason to expect that the people of England will ever become philosophers and critics, we have no need to prophesy that Scott, Southey, Moore, and Byron, will ever be forgotten. Ariosto and Wieland, and other romantic poets, have long been the favourite authors of the successive generations of Italy and Germany. The tawdry Darwin, and the feeble Hayley, have indeed been popular, and will be so no more ;-but did they ever affect and enchant our minds like Scott and Southey? The popularity of the poets whom G. M. depreciates, arises from causes too deeply seated in human nature ever to be destroyed. In spite of all the critics in the world, the reader will love what delights him, without knowing why, or caring wherefore. With respect to Moore, though he flutters about and about Parnassus, like the humming-bird sipping dew and honey as he flies, yet there is a beauty on his wings, and a sweetness in his song, so exquisite, that the lovers of elegance, fancy, and melody, "will not willingly let him die." And as to Southey and Scott, there is imagination and poetical invention enough in them, to make twenty of many such poets as have been admitted into the list. I can say amen to G. M.'s praise of Campbell's chaste, coy, and healthy muse. Campbell is the most accurate and spotless of all our modern bards; but he must not be compared in genius and power with some of those whom G. M. has slighted. Criticism can be of no use unless it is just : let all have their due, and let us not contemn mighty genius, because it is not correct, nor unduly exalt inferior genius because it is. POETRY. STANZAS IN ADMIRATION OF WINTER. WHEN spring approaching decks the green, And cheers with smiles the length'ning day, We turn from Winter's dreary scene, Aud feel, and own, the genial ray. But winter, too, can charm the soul; Though frosts and storms are in his train, And blust'ring Eurus' sullen howl Proclaims his unrelenting reign. Though scarce one songster greet the dawn, Nor Sol long ling'ring cheer the night, I will not sigh for absent light. With me surround the cheerful fire. Cynthia her silver lamp displays, Who, but would wish 'twere winter still? While o'er heav'n's broad expanse they gaze. Yet, if beneath the furious blast We almost wish the season gone, Mark! when the bitter storm is past, How sweetly smiling spring comes on. J. R. Hexham, Feb. 28th, 1822. 'Tis thus he rides; though not with mighty pomp, No pageant bears his hideous consequence, * * * The heated fancy of the fev'rish brain, # * * * He mounts his winged Pegasus of fate, Disease in palid state stalks out to bear My soul then sicken'd, and I lost the gem Ah! when I turn with retrospective view And each enjoyment of the raptur'd boy; Like his, perhaps my voyage soon will end; Freed from its shackles, my blest soul shall soar To realms whence sorrow has for ever fled, I lost my father when an artless child, Some pleasing bauble, or some pastime dear, And the eye glisten'd with a tender tear. His gloomy train, and Death, tho' last, not I'd freely tell my little history here, And ev'ry sorrow in this world of guile; That ere my youth had reach'd its sixteenth It stung me deeply, and transfix'd my heart. Written on the loss of a Friend, who died of the And roll their course o'er man's devoted Yellow Fever, in the Havanah. WHAT means this sad despondency of mind, Droop by degrees with every added year; head, Our former pleasures we no longer heed, In verdant groves and ever-blooming vales, Though once, alas! they could bestow de- And yield to life a never-ceasing zest. ON SECRET SINNERS. SUCH men are like to owls; they take delight WRITTEN FOR MY PRAYER BOOK. Almighty Fountain of eternal bliss, Great God! in tender mercy grant me this, That as I read this sacred book, inspire Let me with faith thy holy truths pursue, My soul with ardent zeal, and heav'nly fire; And keep my God for ever in my view. Sprung from thy bounty, all I have is thine; Teach me to pray, and whatsoe'er I do, Trembling, I kneel before thy awful throne, To thee my thoughts and all my wants are known: O cleanse these thoughts, and pure affections give, And through thy mercy bid a sinner live. New York, March 2, 1821. |