The Law of Contracts, 2±ÇBaker, Voorhis & Company, 1920 |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
1173 ÆäÀÌÁö
... Supra , ¡× 601 . 25 See supra , ¡× 608 , infra , ¡×¡× 618 , 650 . the law ( whether that is the local or the ¡× 609 1173 GENERAL RULES The local standard is preferable to the normal standard 608 Clear and unambiguous words 609.
... Supra , ¡× 601 . 25 See supra , ¡× 608 , infra , ¡×¡× 618 , 650 . the law ( whether that is the local or the ¡× 609 1173 GENERAL RULES The local standard is preferable to the normal standard 608 Clear and unambiguous words 609.
1179 ÆäÀÌÁö
... supra , ¡× 608 . " See supra , ¡× 609 . " See 4 Wigmore , Evidence , p . 3481 . 36 Goode v . Riley , 153 Mass . 585 , 28 N. E. 228 . should mean one hundred inches , or that Bunker Hill $ 611 1179 GENERAL RULES.
... supra , ¡× 608 . " See supra , ¡× 609 . " See 4 Wigmore , Evidence , p . 3481 . 36 Goode v . Riley , 153 Mass . 585 , 28 N. E. 228 . should mean one hundred inches , or that Bunker Hill $ 611 1179 GENERAL RULES.
1182 ÆäÀÌÁö
... supra , ¡× 576 . 40 In Carland v . Western Union Telegraph Co. , 118 Mich . 369 , 76 N. W. 762 , 43 L. R. A. 280 , 74 Am . St. Rep . 394 , the plaintiff sent a tele- gram reading " Buy 3 May . " He was allowed to testify in an action ...
... supra , ¡× 576 . 40 In Carland v . Western Union Telegraph Co. , 118 Mich . 369 , 76 N. W. 762 , 43 L. R. A. 280 , 74 Am . St. Rep . 394 , the plaintiff sent a tele- gram reading " Buy 3 May . " He was allowed to testify in an action ...
1195 ÆäÀÌÁö
... supra , ¡× 605 . 74 Dwy v . Connecticut Co. , 89 Conn . So In 74 , 92 Atl . 883 , L. R. A. 1915 E. 800 ; Kane v . Hood , 13 Pick . 281 . Robertson v . French , 4 East , 130 , 134 , Lord Ellenborough said : " The same rule of construction ...
... supra , ¡× 605 . 74 Dwy v . Connecticut Co. , 89 Conn . So In 74 , 92 Atl . 883 , L. R. A. 1915 E. 800 ; Kane v . Hood , 13 Pick . 281 . Robertson v . French , 4 East , 130 , 134 , Lord Ellenborough said : " The same rule of construction ...
1213 ÆäÀÌÁö
... Supra , ¡× 90 . 47a See supra , ¡× 622 . 48 In Sturm v . Boker , 150 U. S. 312 , 37 L. Ed . 1093 , 14 S. Ct . 99 , the court held that clear statements in a writ- ten contract could not be varied by the terms of a printed billhead on an ...
... Supra , ¡× 90 . 47a See supra , ¡× 622 . 48 In Sturm v . Boker , 150 U. S. 312 , 37 L. Ed . 1093 , 14 S. Ct . 99 , the court held that clear statements in a writ- ten contract could not be varied by the terms of a printed billhead on an ...
¸ñÂ÷
1157 | |
1162 | |
1173 | |
1182 | |
1188 | |
1194 | |
1202 | |
1203 | |
1740 | |
1746 | |
1752 | |
1757 | |
1763 | |
1769 | |
1775 | |
1782 | |
1211 | |
1216 | |
1219 | |
1225 | |
1232 | |
1238 | |
1245 | |
1251 | |
1257 | |
1267 | |
1272 | |
1278 | |
1284 | |
1290 | |
1297 | |
1304 | |
1305 | |
1312 | |
1314 | |
1320 | |
1327 | |
1342 | |
1390 | |
1396 | |
1403 | |
1409 | |
1418 | |
1425 | |
1431 | |
1439 | |
1447 | |
1453 | |
1460 | |
1463 | |
1468 | |
1469 | |
1475 | |
1481 | |
1488 | |
1494 | |
1501 | |
1507 | |
1513 | |
1519 | |
1525 | |
1536 | |
1546 | |
1552 | |
1558 | |
1559 | |
1564 | |
1570 | |
1576 | |
1584 | |
1591 | |
1598 | |
1604 | |
1606 | |
1614 | |
1621 | |
1627 | |
1634 | |
1641 | |
1649 | |
1656 | |
1663 | |
1670 | |
1677 | |
1684 | |
1690 | |
1694 | |
1701 | |
1708 | |
1714 | |
1720 | |
1726 | |
1733 | |
1790 | |
1796 | |
1803 | |
1810 | |
1811 | |
1816 | |
1823 | |
1830 | |
1836 | |
1843 | |
1849 | |
1857 | |
1863 | |
1869 | |
1878 | |
1885 | |
1891 | |
1898 | |
1904 | |
1910 | |
1916 | |
1922 | |
1928 | |
1934 | |
1943 | |
1949 | |
1955 | |
1962 | |
1968 | |
1974 | |
1980 | |
1993 | |
2002 | |
2008 | |
2015 | |
2021 | |
2033 | |
2033 | |
2034 | |
2043 | |
2049 | |
2055 | |
2061 | |
2068 | |
2076 | |
2085 | |
2099 | |
2105 | |
2111 | |
2119 | |
2130 | |
2136 | |
2137 | |
2144 | |
2151 | |
2157 | |
2164 | |
2170 | |
2176 | |
2182 | |
2188 | |
2193 | |
2199 | |
2213 | |
2220 | |
2228 | |
2240 | |
2276 | |
2282 | |
2288 | |
2298 | |
2299 | |
2306 | |
2312 | |
2319 | |
2325 | |
±âŸ ÃâÆǺ» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
acceptance accord and satisfaction action agreed agreement applied assent Bank bargain bilateral contract breach of condition buyer circumstances cited Clydebank condition precedent Conn consideration construction construed court courts of equity covenant decisions default defective defendant delivery dition effect election enforce equity estoppel excuse express fact failure forfeiture held implied infra instalment intention Iowa language liability liquidated damages Lumber Mass meaning ment Minn mutual N. J. Eq N. Y. App N. Y. Misc negotiable instrument obligation paid parol evidence parol evidence rule parties payment penalty performance plaintiff premium principle promisor promissory estoppel purchaser question reason recover refusal rule seller Singer Mfg Smith statute stipulation supra surrender tender tion tract usage waived waiver warranty words writing written contract
Àαâ Àο뱸
1806 ÆäÀÌÁö - Any affirmation of fact or any promise by the seller relating to the goods is an express warranty if the natural tendency of such affirmation or promise is to induce the buyer to purchase the goods, and if the buyer purchases the goods relying thereon. No affirmation of the value of the goods, nor any statement purporting to be a statement of the seller's opinion only shall be construed as a warranty.
2048 ÆäÀÌÁö - Negotiation Defeats Vendor's Lien. Where a negotiable receipt has been issued for goods, no seller's lien or right of stoppage in transitu...
1785 ÆäÀÌÁö - Unless otherwise agreed, delivery of the goods and payment of the price are concurrent conditions ; that is to say, the seller must be ready and willing to give possession of the goods...
1170 ÆäÀÌÁö - Hall, that in construing wills, and indeed statutes, and all written instruments, the grammatical and ordinary sense of the words is to be adhered to, unless that would lead to some absurdity or some repugnance or inconsistency with the rest of the instrument, in which case the grammatical and ordinary sense of the words may be modified, so as to avoid that absurdity and inconsistency, but no further.
1822 ÆäÀÌÁö - Subject to the provisions of this Act and of any statute in that behalf, there is no implied warranty or condition as to the quality or fitness for any particular purpose of goods supplied under a contract of sale...
2043 ÆäÀÌÁö - That if goods are delivered to a carrier by the owner or by a person whose act in conveying the title to them to a purchaser...
1822 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... (2.) Where the goods are bought by description from a seller who deals in goods of that description (whether he be the grower or manufacturer or not), there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be of merchantable quality.
1344 ÆäÀÌÁö - In the absence of express or implied agreement of the parties, acceptance of the goods by the buyer shall not discharge the seller from liability in damages or other legal remedy for breach of any promise or warranty in the contract to sell or the sale. But, if, after acceptance of the goods, the buyer fails to give notice to the seller of the breach of any promise or warranty within a reasonable time after the buyer knows, or ought to know of such breach, the seller shall not be liable therefor.
2061 ÆäÀÌÁö - An instrument which contains an order or promise to do any act in addition to the payment of money is not negotiable. But the negotiable character of an instrument otherwise negotiable is not affected by a provision which: (1) Authorizes the sale of collateral securities in case the instrument be not paid at maturity...
1145 ÆäÀÌÁö - When the terms of an agreement have been intended in a different sense by the different parties to it, that sense is to prevail against either party in which he supposed the other understood it...