| New York (State) - 1852 - 606 ÆäÀÌÁö
...(Amended 1849-1852.) Counterclaim. Several defenses — The counter-claim mentioned in the last section, must be one existing in favor of a defendant and against a plaintiff, between whom a several judgment might be liad in the action, and arising out of one of the following... | |
| Henry Whittaker - 1852 - 900 ÆäÀÌÁö
...and concise language, without repetition. ¡× 150. The counter-claim mentioned in the last section, must be one existing in favor of a defendant, and against a plaintiff, between whom a several judgment might be had in the action, and arising out of one of the following... | |
| New York (State) - 1852 - 836 ÆäÀÌÁö
...without repetition. A wTwai ¡× 150.' The counter-claim mentioned in the last section, ITO£'"W "id must be one existing in favor of a defendant, and against a iriSus"!¢â plaintiff, between whom a several judgment might be had r )]imTius":0 m t'ie acti¡ÆD5 an(l... | |
| Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1853 - 594 ÆäÀÌÁö
...intended to answer. Now it defines what the counter claim, mentioned in section 149, is. The counter claim must be one existing in favor of a defendant, and against a plaintiff between whom a several judgment might be had in the action. In the present case the defendants undertook... | |
| Wisconsin - 1853 - 810 ÆäÀÌÁö
...repetition. What consti- SKO. 55. The counter claim mentioned in the last section. • tor^aimOUI1 must be one existing in favor of a defendant and against a plaintiff, between whom a several judgment might be I; . had in the action, and arising out of one of the following... | |
| John Duer, New York (State). Superior Court (New York) - 1855 - 738 ÆäÀÌÁö
...the Code is too clear and explicit to be misunderstood. The counter-claim mentioned in section 150, must be one existing in favor of a defendant and against a plaintiff, between whom & several judgment might be had in the action, and arising out of one of the following... | |
| New York (State) - 1855 - 802 ÆäÀÌÁö
...(Amended 1849-1852.) Counter Claim. Several defences. The counter-claim mentioned in the last section, must be one existing in favor of a defendant, and against a plaintiff, between whom a several judgment might be had in the action, and arising out of one of the following... | |
| Wisconsin - 1856 - 334 ÆäÀÌÁö
...repetition. What const!- Sue 55. The counter claim mentioned in the last section, tcr"claim.Uim' muse be one existing in favor of a defendant and against a plaintiff, between whom a several judgment might b» had in the action, and arising out of one of the following... | |
| Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1857 - 722 ÆäÀÌÁö
...against the plaintiff. Section 150 ia as follows : " The counter-claim mentioned in the last section must be one existing in favor of a defendant and against a plaintiff, between whom a several judgment might be had in the action." This applies only to the plaintiff on... | |
| District of Columbia - 1857 - 788 ÆäÀÌÁö
...may be intelligibly distinguished. SEC. 13. The counter-claim mentioned in the last preceding section must be one existing in favor of a defendant and against a plaintiff between whom a several judgment might be had in the action, and arising out of the contract or transaction... | |
| |