Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright Cases"Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
2 ÆäÀÌÁö
FISIER , A88sistant Commissioner : This is an appeal taken from the decision of
the Primary Examiner refusing to dissolve the above - entitled interference . The
two applications cover an apparatus used in playing a DECISIONS OF THE ...
FISIER , A88sistant Commissioner : This is an appeal taken from the decision of
the Primary Examiner refusing to dissolve the above - entitled interference . The
two applications cover an apparatus used in playing a DECISIONS OF THE ...
3 ÆäÀÌÁö
... party was entitled to the broad claim as being the original inventor . His only
remedy , as far as this Office is concerned , would be to file a reissue application
and demand that it be put in interference with the patent containing the broad
claim ...
... party was entitled to the broad claim as being the original inventor . His only
remedy , as far as this Office is concerned , would be to file a reissue application
and demand that it be put in interference with the patent containing the broad
claim ...
13 ÆäÀÌÁö
FISHER , Assistant Commissioner : This is an appeal from the action of the
Primary Examiner refusing to dissolve the above - entitled interference on the
three following counts : First . Because no interference in fact exists , the patent
and the ...
FISHER , Assistant Commissioner : This is an appeal from the action of the
Primary Examiner refusing to dissolve the above - entitled interference on the
three following counts : First . Because no interference in fact exists , the patent
and the ...
16 ÆäÀÌÁö
... Examiner refusing to dissolve the above - entitled interference , it being urged
that Willett ' s claims are specific to his device , and that he has made no claim
that Grimmett can make . The issue is as follows : In a grain elevator , an upper
pair ...
... Examiner refusing to dissolve the above - entitled interference , it being urged
that Willett ' s claims are specific to his device , and that he has made no claim
that Grimmett can make . The issue is as follows : In a grain elevator , an upper
pair ...
34 ÆäÀÌÁö
By a rule of practice Curtiss is entitled to December 11 , 1890 , as the date of
constructive reduction to practice . He never actually reduced his invention to
practice and is in conflict with an inventor who did . The attempt is made to carry
back ...
By a rule of practice Curtiss is entitled to December 11 , 1890 , as the date of
constructive reduction to practice . He never actually reduced his invention to
practice and is in conflict with an inventor who did . The attempt is made to carry
back ...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
action alleged allowed aluminium anticipated apparatus appeal application arranged attached bill carried cause Circuit Circuit Court claim combination Commissioner Company complainant connected considered consists construction contained Court covered dated Decided decision decree defendant described device direction District drawings effect electric elements entitled evidence Examiner fact filed final follows further granted ground Held hold improvement infringement interference invention inventor involved issued known Letters Patent limited machine manufacture March mark material matter means mechanism metal motion moving necessary object operation opinion original particular parties pass Patent Office pipe piston plate position practice present prior produce question reason record reference rejected result rule says secured shown side specification spring statement substantially sufficient suit taken testimony tion trade-mark United validity valve
Àαâ Àο뱸
247 ÆäÀÌÁö - It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties and those in privity with them, not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose...
207 ÆäÀÌÁö - Office a written description of the same, and of the manner and process of making, constructing, compounding, and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same...
212 ÆäÀÌÁö - Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy, but an interest of such a nature that a final decree cannot be made without either affecting that interest, or leaving the controversy in such a condition that its final termination may be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience.
180 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers.
296 ÆäÀÌÁö - any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof...
128 ÆäÀÌÁö - In considering the operation of this judgment, it. should be borne In mind, as stated by counsel, that there is a difference between the effect of a judgment as a bar or estoppel against the prosecution of a second action upon the same claim or demand, and its effect as an estoppel In another action between the same parties upon a different claim or cause of action.
659 ÆäÀÌÁö - Concurrent with the Court of Claims, of all claims not exceeding ten thousand dollars founded upon the Constitution of the United States or any law of Congress, or upon any regulation of an Executive Department, or upon any contract, express or implied, with the Government of the United States...
693 ÆäÀÌÁö - The claim is a statutory requirement, prescribed for the very purpose of making the patentee define precisely what his invention is ; and it is unjust to the public, as well as an evasion of the law, to construe it in a manner different from the plain import of its terms.
658 ÆäÀÌÁö - All claims founded upon the Constitution of the United States or any law of Congress, except for pensions, or upon any regulation of an Executive Department, or upon any contract, expressed or implied, with the Government of the United States...
247 ÆäÀÌÁö - From the variety of cases relative to judgments being given in evidence in civil suits these two deductions seem to follow as generally true: First, that the judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction directly upon the point is as a plea a bar, or as evidence, conclusive between the same parties upon the same matter directly in question in another court...