Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright Cases"Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
3 ÆäÀÌÁö
Applicant Kinyon has a broad claim , which covers not only the particular form
shown in his application , but also the form shown in Carter ' s application . Carter
' s application has one claim , which is limited to the specific form shown . Kinyon
...
Applicant Kinyon has a broad claim , which covers not only the particular form
shown in his application , but also the form shown in Carter ' s application . Carter
' s application has one claim , which is limited to the specific form shown . Kinyon
...
4 ÆäÀÌÁö
... applications were allowed are the same in both cases , and that the differences
which Kinyon points out between the species shown in his application and that
shown in Carter ' s application are immaterial in view of the prior state of the art .
... applications were allowed are the same in both cases , and that the differences
which Kinyon points out between the species shown in his application and that
shown in Carter ' s application are immaterial in view of the prior state of the art .
13 ÆäÀÌÁö
Because the snbject matter covered by the applicant ' s claim was not patentable
at the date of filing his application , it being anticipated by certain iuventions
shown in the British patents to Todd , No . 8 , 552 , dated June 3 , 1884 , and ...
Because the snbject matter covered by the applicant ' s claim was not patentable
at the date of filing his application , it being anticipated by certain iuventions
shown in the British patents to Todd , No . 8 , 552 , dated June 3 , 1884 , and ...
14 ÆäÀÌÁö
The fact that Duncan ' s claim covers either the device shown in Fig . 1 or the
device shown in Fig . 2 presents no valid reason for dissolving the iuterference
when Westinghouse discloses and claims a device which is the full equivalent of
what ...
The fact that Duncan ' s claim covers either the device shown in Fig . 1 or the
device shown in Fig . 2 presents no valid reason for dissolving the iuterference
when Westinghouse discloses and claims a device which is the full equivalent of
what ...
21 ÆäÀÌÁö
The sketches shown by Leeman and claimed to have been made in 1886 , being
without date , together with his testimony upon them , must be laid out of the case
as contradicting his preliminary statement . Nothing can be inferred from the ...
The sketches shown by Leeman and claimed to have been made in 1886 , being
without date , together with his testimony upon them , must be laid out of the case
as contradicting his preliminary statement . Nothing can be inferred from the ...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
action alleged allowed aluminium anticipated apparatus appeal application arranged attached bill carried cause Circuit Circuit Court claim combination Commissioner Company complainant connected considered consists construction contained Court covered dated Decided decision decree defendant described device direction District drawings effect electric elements entitled evidence Examiner fact filed final follows further granted ground Held hold improvement infringement interference invention inventor involved issued known Letters Patent limited machine manufacture March mark material matter means mechanism metal motion moving necessary object operation opinion original particular parties pass Patent Office pipe piston plate position practice present prior produce question reason record reference rejected result rule says secured shown side specification spring statement substantially sufficient suit taken testimony tion trade-mark United validity valve
Àαâ Àο뱸
247 ÆäÀÌÁö - It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties and those in privity with them, not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose...
207 ÆäÀÌÁö - Office a written description of the same, and of the manner and process of making, constructing, compounding, and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same...
212 ÆäÀÌÁö - Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy, but an interest of such a nature that a final decree cannot be made without either affecting that interest, or leaving the controversy in such a condition that its final termination may be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience.
180 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers.
296 ÆäÀÌÁö - any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof...
128 ÆäÀÌÁö - In considering the operation of this judgment, it. should be borne In mind, as stated by counsel, that there is a difference between the effect of a judgment as a bar or estoppel against the prosecution of a second action upon the same claim or demand, and its effect as an estoppel In another action between the same parties upon a different claim or cause of action.
659 ÆäÀÌÁö - Concurrent with the Court of Claims, of all claims not exceeding ten thousand dollars founded upon the Constitution of the United States or any law of Congress, or upon any regulation of an Executive Department, or upon any contract, express or implied, with the Government of the United States...
693 ÆäÀÌÁö - The claim is a statutory requirement, prescribed for the very purpose of making the patentee define precisely what his invention is ; and it is unjust to the public, as well as an evasion of the law, to construe it in a manner different from the plain import of its terms.
658 ÆäÀÌÁö - All claims founded upon the Constitution of the United States or any law of Congress, except for pensions, or upon any regulation of an Executive Department, or upon any contract, expressed or implied, with the Government of the United States...
247 ÆäÀÌÁö - From the variety of cases relative to judgments being given in evidence in civil suits these two deductions seem to follow as generally true: First, that the judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction directly upon the point is as a plea a bar, or as evidence, conclusive between the same parties upon the same matter directly in question in another court...