Hearing Before the Committee on Interstate Commerce, United States Senate, Sixty-second Congress, Pursuant to S. Res. 98: A Resolution Directing the Committee on Interstate Commerce to Investigate and Report Desirable Changes in the Laws Regulating and Controlling Corporations, Persons, and Firms Engaged in Interstate Commerce, 2±ÇU.S. Government Printing Office, 1912 |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
1433 ÆäÀÌÁö
... rather , the Judiciary Committee of the Senate of the United States , in framing the Sherman Act had that distinction most clearly in mind , and that the language of that statute so disclosed — it was never the intention to apply ...
... rather , the Judiciary Committee of the Senate of the United States , in framing the Sherman Act had that distinction most clearly in mind , and that the language of that statute so disclosed — it was never the intention to apply ...
1467 ÆäÀÌÁö
This commission should have power( 2 ) Upon the application of any citizen , or of its own motion ... ( d ) Parties proposing to enter into a contract or combination should have the right to apply to the commission for an order ...
This commission should have power( 2 ) Upon the application of any citizen , or of its own motion ... ( d ) Parties proposing to enter into a contract or combination should have the right to apply to the commission for an order ...
1469 ÆäÀÌÁö
It is doubtful whether a compulsory licensing law would be constitutional , but even if it were , the antitrust act would continue to apply to the licensed corporations and the present problems would remain .
It is doubtful whether a compulsory licensing law would be constitutional , but even if it were , the antitrust act would continue to apply to the licensed corporations and the present problems would remain .
1513 ÆäÀÌÁö
Now , with reference to the holding companies , would you have your prohibition apply only to companies that are organized in the future , or would you have it apply to those already organized and now existing ? Mr. FARRAR .
Now , with reference to the holding companies , would you have your prohibition apply only to companies that are organized in the future , or would you have it apply to those already organized and now existing ? Mr. FARRAR .
1530 ÆäÀÌÁö
... to engage in intrastate commerce in all the States , and this under a rule of comity which is derived from international law , but , as stated above , it is one of those rules which each State may apply , or not , at her pleasure .
... to engage in intrastate commerce in all the States , and this under a rule of comity which is derived from international law , but , as stated above , it is one of those rules which each State may apply , or not , at her pleasure .
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
action agree agreement amendment American Federation antitrust apply Association attempt authority banks believe bill boycotts called capital carry cent CHAIRMAN charge City combination commission committee common competition concerns Congress conspiracy Constitution contract corporation cost course create decision defendants effect engaged establish existing fact Federation of Labor further give Government holding illegal individual industry International interstate commerce KRAUTHOFF legislation limit machines manufacturers matter means monopoly MORAWETZ necessary operation opinion Organizer reports parties person practically present production profit prohibit pushed question reason referred regulation respect restraint of trade result rule securities sell Senator BRANDEGEE Senator CUMMINS Senator NEWLANDS Sherman law shoe statute Supreme Court thing tion trust Union United unlawful violation Workers