Hearing Before the Committee on Interstate Commerce, United States Senate, Sixty-second Congress, Pursuant to S. Res. 98: A Resolution Directing the Committee on Interstate Commerce to Investigate and Report Desirable Changes in the Laws Regulating and Controlling Corporations, Persons, and Firms Engaged in Interstate Commerce, 2±ÇU.S. Government Printing Office, 1912 |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
1433 ÆäÀÌÁö
I do not believe that there can be a monopoly , otherwise illegal , which can be sustained as being reasonable . ... act against monopolies , which declared generally that monopolies were against the policy of the law of England .
I do not believe that there can be a monopoly , otherwise illegal , which can be sustained as being reasonable . ... act against monopolies , which declared generally that monopolies were against the policy of the law of England .
1435 ÆäÀÌÁö
... that an association or combination is illegal merely because its tendency is to create a monopoly ; whether it is necessary there shall be an actual tendency , a necessary tendency , or an inherent tendency to create a monopoly .
... that an association or combination is illegal merely because its tendency is to create a monopoly ; whether it is necessary there shall be an actual tendency , a necessary tendency , or an inherent tendency to create a monopoly .
1436 ÆäÀÌÁö
It is interesting to note that the grant of this monopoly to the East India Co. had its ultimate fruition in the wonderful Indian Empire which now pertains to the British Crown and as illustrating that this is a case in which the flag ...
It is interesting to note that the grant of this monopoly to the East India Co. had its ultimate fruition in the wonderful Indian Empire which now pertains to the British Crown and as illustrating that this is a case in which the flag ...
1442 ÆäÀÌÁö
Nearly all the English cases to which the Crown was a party involved a charge of monopoly , and were in the nature of quo warranto proceedings or in the nature of criminal proceedings . There is no English case that I recall in which it ...
Nearly all the English cases to which the Crown was a party involved a charge of monopoly , and were in the nature of quo warranto proceedings or in the nature of criminal proceedings . There is no English case that I recall in which it ...
1443 ÆäÀÌÁö
You recognize , do you not , that under the decisions or opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States the power to exercise authority , or the influence of a monopoly , is held to be contrary to the second section of the Sherman ...
You recognize , do you not , that under the decisions or opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States the power to exercise authority , or the influence of a monopoly , is held to be contrary to the second section of the Sherman ...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
action agree agreement amendment American Federation antitrust apply Association attempt authority banks believe bill boycotts called capital carry cent CHAIRMAN charge City combination commission committee common competition concerns Congress conspiracy Constitution contract corporation cost course create decision defendants effect engaged establish existing fact Federation of Labor further give Government holding illegal individual industry International interstate commerce KRAUTHOFF legislation limit machines manufacturers matter means monopoly MORAWETZ necessary operation opinion Organizer reports parties person practically present production profit prohibit pushed question reason referred regulation respect restraint of trade result rule securities sell Senator BRANDEGEE Senator CUMMINS Senator NEWLANDS Sherman law shoe statute Supreme Court thing tion trust Union United unlawful violation Workers