페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

MEDALS OF THE SOCIETY OF ARTS.

The Society of Arts grew out of a suggestion made by William Shipley, a drawing master of Northampton, and brother of Jonathan Shipley, a well-known Bishop of St. Asaph. Shipley issued on June 8th, 1753,"Proposals for raising by subscription a fund to be distributed in premiums for the promoting of improvements in the Liberal Arts and Sciences, Manufactures, &c;" and in December of the same year he published "a scheme for putting the proposals into execution." The Society was formed in 1754, at a meeting held on 22nd of March at Rawthmell's coffee-house in Henriettastreet, Covent-garden. Premiums were at once offered for the discovery of cobalt and the growth of madder in this country, and for proficiency in drawing. With these offers the Society commenced its prosperous career. A proposal to give medals" on some occasions instead of money" was considered at the meeting of April 30th, 1755, but the matter was postponed as no action could be taken that year. Henry Baker, F.R.S., read a paper on March, 24th, 1756, proposing the distribution of medals as honorary premiums, in which

he said

"It is therefore proposed that a dye be made for striking medals of gold, silver, and copper (with proper devices), to be occasionally bestowed by the Society as a token of honour and esteem on such as shall practice or produce some new manufacture or discovery that may employ many hands, some considerable improvement of public utility, or some valuable branch of commerce in one or the other metal, according to the nature and consequence of the improvement or discovery; which medals in gold shall be of £5 value, and proportionately in silver and copper, though, in all of them, the honour of being thus distinguished is the principal object of regard."

a report. The general meeting of the Society discussed the point on June 7, and resolved:

"That it is the opinion of this Society that the sid medal does not, both in execution and expense, answer the interest and expectation of the Society." It was further resolved that dies and puncheons should be cut for a new medal, according to the designs of Mr. Stuart, the value in gold not to be less than five, nor to exceed eight guineas, pursuant to a former resolution. Mr. Stuart was now asked to appoint his own artist, and he chose Thomas Pingo, the famous die sinker, who agreed to cut dies and puncheons for eighty guineas. The work was quite satisfactory, but in November Pingo found that he could not buy gold and silver without a licence, and Mr. Pinchbeck (a rather ominous name, considering the metal associated with his name) was desired to furnish Mr. Pingo with gold and silver for the purpose. At last the Society obtained what they had so long been striving for-3 thoroughly good medal, at a reasonable cost. On November 29, the thanks of the Society were unanimously given to Mr. Stuart, and a gold medal was ordered to be presented to him, for the great care and trouble he had taken in this matter. On December 6, it was ordered:

"That the inscriptions on the first gold medal, which is to be presented to Lord Viscount Folkestone, Presi dent of this Society, be forthwith engraved, as follows (in pursuance of the resolution of the 24th of May last):-On the reverse, without the wreath of olive, To JACOB, VISCOUNT FOLKESTONE, PRESIDENT; and within the wreath of olive, FOR EMINENT SERVICES."

the same meeting. To Lord Romney, for eminent Inscriptions for other gold medals were ordered at services; to Lady Augusta Greville, for drawing, 1757; to the Duke of Beaufort, Philip Carteret Webb, F.R.S., and John Berney-all for sowing acorns, 1757; and to James Stuart, painter and architect, "for designing this medal." The obverse of the medal is shown in the annexed figure.

This paper was referred to a committee for consideration on March 31st. The committee reported on April 7th that they were of opinion that the giving of medals would be of utility, and they suggested that a committee should be appointed to consider a proper device. Subsequently Mr. Baker submitted a sketch of a design, as did Nicholas Crisp and Mr. Ralph. Hogarth, Henry Cheere, and Nicholas Highmore were upon the medal committee, who agreed upon a device, and afterwards James Stuart, William Chambers, and Thomas Hollis, were added to the committee. After the design had beeu chased upon gold plates, and the order given for the dies to be cut, a difficulty arose. It was decided on March 23, 1757, that the value of the medal should not exceed ten guineas, but when specimens of the selected design were produced it was found that the die could not be carried out completely if less than 15 guineas' worth of gold was used. This was considered too much, and the report of the committee was referred back to them, with instructions to obtain a new device which should only need gold to the There was much discussion in the Society res amount of five guineas. If, however, the device pecting the inscription on the obverse of this meds! in hand could be executed for the proposed five Thus in May, 1857, it was decided that the legend guineas, this was to be preferred. On May, 24th, should be Arts and Commerce Promoted" in 1758, Mr. Yeo produced two gold medals, struck stead of "Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce Prefrom the die which he had cast, the value of one moted." In November it was changed to "Society being ten guineas, that of the other, £8 10s. This for Promoting Arts and Commerce," and later was not considered satisfactory, and the committee the inscription as first proposed was adopted. In to whom the matter was referred declined to make the earlier draft the date of institution was set down

[graphic]

First Medal of the Society.

as 1753, but afterwards it was fixed for the year 1754.

This medal was largely used for nearly half a century, but in 1801, James Barry took occasion in his account of his additions to the pictures in the great room, to suggest an improvement in the design. He wrote:

At a meeting of the Society, on the 4th December, 1805, a report of the Committee, recommending that Mr. Flaxman be desired to furnish a design, on the principle suggested by Mr. Barry, was read, when Barry made a motion to the effect that the report should be recommitted, but his motion was not agreed to. The next meeting, on the 11th of December, was apparently a stormy "Mr. Barry begs leave to add, from a letter read by one, for a series of motions were brought forward, him to the Society, Ooctober 25th, 1801, that in con- most of which were "disagreed to." At last, Mr. sequence of the application for designs for a new die for Wakefield made the definite proposition that "the their medal, he stated his intention of introducing a modification of their former design, which he thought name of Flaxman be erased, and that of Barry would answer their intended purpose. The more the inserted; " but this did not find favour with the subject matter of that design is considered, the more meeting, and eventually the original resolution of one must admire and respect the sterling good sense and the committee was agreed to. Barry died in the weighty consideration of the original founders of the following year, and then there was no obstacle to Society. Nothing can be more happily imagined than the completion of Flaxman's medal. Mr. Pidgeon the idea consisting of Britannia aided by Minerva and prepared the dies, and in November, 1806, FlaxMercury, the classical tutelary deities of Arts, Manu-man expressed himself as highly pleased with the factures, and Commerce; and this old device, like many excellence of the execution. The Society were so other good old usages, cannot be amended by any change in the substratum. It requires nothing more in its essence, and will most happily coalesce and accommodate with all the acquisitions and improvements of the most enlarged and refined culture. For this purpose a little more goût and character in the figures is all that is necessary, enlarging them so as to fill the space with more dignity, and taking away from their individual scattered appearance by the little graces and arts of a more improved composition. And as there is always a considerable dignity and consequence attached to magnitude which is one of the constituents of sublimity, his suggested alterations would come to this-to substitute instead of the little entire figures of Minerva and Mercury, only two large heads of those deities, and he would omit the head of Britannia altogether, and by a wreath of the shamrock, rose, and thistle, totally rising round the edge of the medal, playing in and out in a graceful gustoso manner, he would represent the present happily United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, with a felicity, at least, equal to the owl, the horse's head, or the dolphin on the Athenian, Punice, or Sicilian

[graphic]

coins.'

Medal designed by Flaxman.

pleased with the new medal, that they desired to have an engraving of it for publication in the Transactions. Flaxman proposed that his sisterThis full description of Barry's views is interest-in-law, Miss Denman, should make the drawing, ing, as showing how completely they were carried out in the new medal. In 1802, a totally different design was discussed. Application was made to Mr. Marchant, Associate of the Royal Academy, and gem engraver, to prepare a die, and the Committee of Polite Arts recommended "The Society to be personified by a female, seated, having in one hand a wreath of laurel, and with the other directing attention to the statues of Minerva, Mercury, and Ceres, the ancient deities presiding over the Liberal arts--commerce and agriculture-the immediate objects of the Society." The obverse of the medal to be the head of the President, with the date of his election, and the value of the gold to be twelve guineas. Mr. Marchant, into whose hands the work was placed, appears to have been very dilatory, and after many inquiries it was decided, in April, 1805, to order him "to suspend proceedings with the dies until he hears from the Society." The Committee of Polite Arts then declared that it was expedient to resume the deliberation as to the design ab initio; and they and that the famous Anker Smith should engrave recommended the Society "That Messrs. Papworth, it. The engraving thus produced forms a frontisFlaxman, Howard, Barry, and Tresham be severally applied to, professionally, to furnish rough piece to the 25th volume of the Transactions. sketches and designs for the intended medal." Among the medals presented in 1807 were these

[graphic]

• Transactions-Vol. 19, pp. xxxvi-xxxix.

two:

Another form of the Minerva medal.

J. Flaxman, Esq., R.A., Buckingham-place, for

the design of the Society's new medal, modelled and presented by him-the first gold medal. Miss Maria Denman, for her drawing of the new medal, the silver medal.

In 1818, it was found that the die for the Minerva medal was worn out, and Mr. Wyon offered to make a new one from Flaxman's original model, and to present it, in consideration of the liberal treatment he had always received from the Society. The thanks of the Society were voted to Wyon "for his very handsome offer" at the meeting on

June 10th.

A case of fraud in the use of one of the medals came under the notice of the Society in the year 1813, which was summarily dealt with. The Minerva medal was given to an inventor "for his safe and economical fire of wood shavings," and the man engraved a representation of the medal on his business card, with the statement that the Society had presented it to him "for his invention of a superior method of preparing his materials for the manufacturing of pianofortes,

organs, and other musical instruments." On being called upon for an explanation, the pianoforte maker tried unsuccessfully to excuse his action, and, on demand, he gave up the copper-plate at his cards. It was resolved by the Society that this should be destroyed, and all impressions from it burnt, with the exception of two to be placed on the minutes. At the meeting of May 26th

tickets destroyed without loss of time, an order was "The Society deeming it proper to have the plate and given from the chair to that purpose, and they were burnt in the presence of the members."

HONORARY PALLET.

For a few years after the formation of the Society the only honorary reward was Stuart's medal, but about the year 1766 it was thought expedient to adopt some honorary premium in place of pecuniary rewards for such successful candidates in the differ ent Sections (more particularly that of Polite Arts who were under age. At a meeting of the Co

[graphic][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

mittee of Polite Arts on January 28, 1766, it was resolved :

"That these honorary premiums shall be pieces of wrought silver-plate, useful in, or allusive to, the particular art or branch of art in which the candidate claims (as drawing boxes, emblematical pallets, &c.), bearing an inscription exhibiting the name and age of the candidate, and the class and degree of premiums, &c., for which the same is given."

It was subsequently resolved that the pallet should be of an oval figure, 24 inches by 2, of the thickness of half-a crown. On March 21, two drawings which had been presented were considered, and one of them chosen. The die was to cost twenty guineas, and Mr. Johnson was desired to execute it.

There was a great silver pallet and a small one, and also in a few cases a gold pallet was awarded. The first award of the silver pallet was in 1767.

ISIS MEDAL.

The Society has always been greatly interested in the improvement of the art of die-sinking, and

[ocr errors]

Reverse of Pallet.

[merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][merged small]

"To Mr. T. Wyon, Jun., John-street, Blackfriars for a medal die engraving of a beautiful head of Isis, the patroness of the arts, the gold medal."

At a meeting of the Society on April 4th, 1811, it was resolved that this medal should be substituted for the greater silver pallet, as a reward in the department of Polite Arts. But at a subsequent meeting it was agreed that the change should be made at the option of the candidates, and therefore we find in the lists of awards for 1811 that both pallets and Isis medals were given. Later on, the Isis medal became the favourite medal of the Society, and was largely given in the various classes up to quite a late period.

[blocks in formation]

necessary to take some steps for the preparation of a new one. Mr. (now Sir Henry) Cole suggested "That it would be desirable, if possible, to obtain permission to use the H.R.H. Prince Albert's medal dies for the Society, such dies being portraits of His Royal Highness, the Society's President." And he reported to the Council in April of that year that he had been informed by Colonel Phipps that His Royal Highness approved of the suggestion. In August, 1849, it was resolved by the Council"That instructions be given to Mr. Wyon to proceed forthwith in the preparation of the new larger die, with an impression of the head of H.R.H. Prince Albert, presented by His Royal Highness."

[blocks in formation]
[graphic]
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[graphic]

The highest honour in the gift of the Society is the Albert medal, which was founded in memory of H.R.H. the Prince Consort, who was for eighteen years President of the Society. On the 4th February, 1863, the Council resolved :

"That a gold medal, to be called the Albert medal, be provided by the Society, to be awarded by the Council not oftener than once a year, for distinguished merit in promoting Arts, Manufactures, or Commerce."

It was subsequently resolved that Mr. Leonard Wyon be requested to furnish the model for a head of the Prince at a late period of his life, the inscription to be "Albert, Prince Consort." It was decided that the reverse should be illustrative of Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce, and that several well-known artists should be invited to furnish designs. Ultimately, Mr. Leonard Wyon produced a design, which was accepted, and he then proceeded to prepare the dies. The first award of the Albert medal was in 1863, to Sir Rowland Hill: "For his great services to Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce, in the creation of the penny postage, and for his other reforms in the postal system of this country, the benefits of which have extended over the civilised world."

[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

"The seven seasons ending with 1881 have been more disastrous to British agriculture than any seven consecutive years of which we have a record. Those who hold the opinion that the fluctuations of the weather occur in definite cycles, will have some difficulty in finding a parallel to the period of the last seven years, without going back to very remote records. The change in the relative proportions of home-produced and imported wheat which has taken place during the last few years has entirely altered the character of the trade. In 1868-9, two-thirds of the total bread consumed was the produce of home-grown wheat. A few years later the requirements of the country were met by one-half of home-grown and one-half of foreign wheat. But the harvest of 1879 scarcely supplied one loaf in four required, that of 1880 only one in three, and that of 1881 will also supply only about one loaf in three required. We

cannot ignore the fact that, in consequence of these great changes, the question of a good or bad wheat crop, however important it may be to the landowner or the cultivator, is no longer of the same importance to the nation at large as it was formerly. Another point worthy of notice is that, although our requirements for foreign wheat are becoming larger and larger, the fluctuations in the amonnts required from year to year are becoming much less. Thus, after the bad season of 1860, the nett imports of wheat increased from 4 to 10 million quarters, or by more than 100 per cent. In 1872-3 the imports were 3,000,000 quarters more than in the previous year, corresponding to an increase of about 33 per cent. But after the harvest of 1879, the worst on record, when the nett imports of wheat increased from 14.1 to 16.4 million quarters, the increase only amounted to about 16 per cent. During the year ending August 31, 1881, the amount of foreign wheat retained for home consumption was more than sixteen million quarters. As the area under wheat in the United Kingdom was last year rather less than 3,000,000 acres, a deficiency of half a quarter per acre in the yield of the crop, although a very serious matter so far as the interests of the cultivator are concerned, has comparatively little influence on the requirements of the country at large for foreign wheat. I have no doubt that my estimate of the home wheat crop of 1880 was

« 이전계속 »