 The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he is employed in immediate connection with those from whose negligence he might suffer; but because the implied contract...  A Selection of Cases on Agency - 781 페이지저자: Eugene Wambaugh - 1896 - 1061 페이지전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | William Paley - 1847 - 732 페이지
...not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant haf better means of providing for his safety, when he...liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person suffering does not stand towards him in the relation of a stranger, but is one whose... | |
 | 1885 - 544 페이지
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when...against the negligence of any one but himself ; and be is not liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person suffering does not... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1870 - 708 페이지
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when...indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one hut himself; and he is not liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1864 - 674 페이지
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he is employed m immediate connexion with those from whose negligence he might suffer ; but because the implied contract... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 808 페이지
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liahility because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when...liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person suffering does not stand towards him in the relation of a stranger, but is one whose... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1899 - 602 페이지
...responsibility further, the opinion says: "The master is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when...liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person suffering does not stand towards him in the relation of a stranger, but is one whose... | |
 | Edward P. Weeks - 1879 - 368 페이지
...sight and voice, and yet acting together." The master is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when...liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person suffering does not stand toward him in the relation of a stranger; but is one whose... | |
 | Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson - 1881 - 730 페이지
...others," 4 Met., 57. "The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when...liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person suffering does not stand towards him in the relation of a stranger, but is one whese... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - 962 페이지
...others." 4 Mete. 57. " The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when...might suffer ; but because the implied contract of the muster does not extend to indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one but himself; and... | |
 | 1882 - 658 페이지
...in a common employment. The master's liability depends upon the implied contract of the master not to indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one but himself. Hence the separatija of the employment into different departments does not take away the relation of... | |
| |
