ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub

1845.]

Statistics of the European Universities.

199

Another friend, a native of Germany and resident at Leipsic, has sent us the following valuable table.

[blocks in formation]

1150 Bologna 1189 Montpellier

600 410 560 730 730 780

1206 Paris

1222 Salamanca

1224 Naples 1228 Padua

1233 Toulouse

1248 Rome

1249 Oxford 1279 Cambridge 1300 Lyons 1307 Perugia 1308 Coimbra 1337 Sienna 1338 Pisa

1346 Valladolid 1348 Prague 1354 St. Guescar 1361 Pavia 1365 Vienna 1368 Geneva 1385 Heidelberg 1403 Würzburg 1409 Aix 1409 Leipsic 1410 Valencia

1411 St. Andrews

1412 Turin

1419 Rostock

1426 Louvain

1431 Poictiers

1433 Caen

14333 Florence 1441 Bordeaux 1445 Catania 1447 Palermo 1456 Greifswalde 1457 Freiburg 1458 Glasgow 1460 Basel 1465 Pesth 1471 Aberdeen 1474 Toledo

1474 Saragossa 1475 Copenhagen 1476 Upsala

5680 7260 7000 460 400 500 1400 1420 1550

Place.

1477 Tübingen
1486 Grätz
1499 Alcala
1504 Seville
1525 Marburg
1531 Granada
1532 St. Jago
1544 Königsberg

450 1300 1500
1190 1280 1300
600 700 680
5000 5154 5200 1548 Jena
5380 5467 5530|| 1552 Oriola
70 70 80 1564 Besançon
200 210 210 1575 Leyden
1900 1580 Oviedo

200 245 260 1581 Olmütz

510 545 580 1582 Würzburg ren'd 1280 1200 1300 1591 Dublin 1400 1430 1460 1581 Edinburgh

550 535 550 1607 Giessen 1300 1460 1590 1614 Gröningen 2400 2500 2700|| 1621 Strassburg 210 220 330 || 1632 Dorpat 900 600 660 1634 Utrecht 400 510 450 1665 Kiel

115 120 120 1663 Lund 1000 980 950 1672 Innspruck 1600 1410 1600 1694 Halle 180 185 200 1702 Breslau 1200 1300 1705 Moscow 100 90 115

206 220 250 270 280 295 170 200 220 105 115 120 500 500 600

1725 Dijon 1734 Göttingen 1742 Erlangen 1764 Cagliari 1766 Sassari 1784 Lemberg

No. of Students. 1831.1836.1841. 600 700 740 360 400 510

[blocks in formation]

410 420 450

1260 1100 700

260 350 310

240 240 260

225 230 240

800 880 1060

360 370 400

65 70 85

260 280 315

130 150 190

290 300 330

400 500 610

600 600 735 1800 Montauban 200 220 250 1800 Rouen 300 350 300 1801 Rennes 1500 1500 1600 || 1803 Kasan 130 110 140 1803 Charkow 1690 1800 1900 1803 Wilna

460 480 510, 1810 Berlin 250 205 260|| 1806 Lausanne 1110 800 1100 1811 Christiania

|1100 1200|1260|| 1812 Genoa 1160 1300 1450 1816 Liege

1690 1800 2090

200 200 230

600 655 710

450 500 610

350 360 350

[blocks in formation]

It may be stated that several of the universities, in addition to Würzburg and Louvain, have been suspended for longer or shorter periods. At some of the universities, the actual residents are considerably less than the numbers in the table.

[blocks in formation]

According to the calculation of Mr. Calinich of Dresden, there are at the common schools in Germany 62,250 teachers, and 6,000,000 scholars; at the high schools, lyceums, etc. 4,250 teachers, and 75,000 scholars; at the universities, 1400 teachers, and 18,000 students; at the teachers' seminaries, 500 teachers, and 6000 pupils; at the mechanics' schools, 2000 teachers, and 40,000 scholars; at 36 theological seminaries, 70 deaf and dumb asylums, 21 blind asylums, several academies of the fine arts, military academies, orphan houses, etc., 5000 teachers, and 461,000 pupils; making in all 75,400 teachers, and 6,600,000 scholars. Calinich estimates the whole cost at 22,900,000 rix dollars, or 15,500,000 for the common schools; 2,500,000 for the high-schools; 1,500,000 for the universities; 400,000 for the teachers' seminaries; and the remainder for the other institutions. According to this computation, one sixth of the population of Germany are connected with the schools, at a cost of about half a rix dollar annually to each inhabitant.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Commentary upon Seneca De Clementia,

Calvin's flight from Paris-Residence in Angouleme and in

348

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

VII. REMARKS ON THE AUTHENTICITY AND GENUINENESS OF
THE PENTATEUCH, .

By B. B. Edwards, Professor at Andover.

356

§ 1. The Importance of Caution in an Inquiry of this Nature,
2. Historical Skepticism less prevalent now than formerly,
3. Credibility of the Jewish Historians,

361 363

371

4. Early Origin of Alphabetic Writing,

374

5. Language and Style of the Pentateuch does not prove its

[blocks in formation]

IX. SELECT LITERARY INTELLIGENCE,

Classical and General Literature,

Works on Hebrew Grammar, Biblical Interpretation, etc.

398

400

400

401

BIBLIOTHECA SACRA

AND

THEOLOGICAL REVIEW.

NO. VI.

MAY, 1845.

ARTICLE I.

REFORMERS BEFORE THE REFORMATION.

BRETHREN OF THE LIFE IN COMMON; AN ACCOUNT OF THE ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF THE INSTITUTION, AND ITS INFLUENCE UPON LITERATURE AND RELIGION.1

Barnas,

By B. Sears, D. D. President of Newton Theological Institution.

LIKE all institutions of a solid character and of a permanent influence upon society, that of the Brethren of the Life in Common, was called into being by the wants of the age and of the country in which it originated. So helpless was the condition of multitudes of individuals in the middle ages, and so destitute of life the scholastic theology, the religion, or rather the superstitions of the church, that associations for mutual relief, and for spiritual edification among the people were certainly altogether natural, if not absolutely necessary. The communities of the Beguins, Beghards and Lollards, which were the first essays to satisfy those necessities, had originally so many defects, and had, moreover, so far degenerated in their character since their establishment, that they either went to decay of themselves, or were suppressed by authority. And yet both the physical and the moral causes which, in that age of political disorder and of ecclesiastical corruption, had awakened a desire for such fraternities, continued in their unabated strength. Nowhere did the civil disorders, and, at

1 The substance of this Article is taken from the work of Ullmann entitled Reformatoren vor der Reformation, Vol. II. pp. 62–201. The work itself has. been reviewed in a former number.

[blocks in formation]

"

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »