« 이전계속 »
BY WILLIAM CRANCHI,
TICS IGNORATIO JURIS LITIGIOSA EST, QUAM SCIENTIA.
('C DE LEGIBITS DIAL. I.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, TO WIT:
BE IT REVIEMBERED, That on the 10th day of February, in the forty-first year of the Independence of the United States of America, Wile . liam Cranch, of the said district, hath deposited in this office, the title of a book, che right whereof be claims as author, in the words following, to wit:
| Reports of Cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States “in February term, 1815. Vol. IX. "By° WILLIAM CRANCH, Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of the district of Columbia. Potius ignoratio juris litigiosa est, quan scientia
“Cic. de legibus, dial. i.”
In conformity to the act of the Congress of the United States, intituled “ An aot for the encouragement o learning, by securing the copies of maps, charts and books; to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned.”
REPRINTED IN TAIWAN
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.
Honorable.John MARSHALL, Chief Justice.
Honorable BUSHROD WASHINGTON,
SAssociate Justices. THOMAS TODD,
GABRIEL DUVALL, and
RICHARD Rusy, Esquire, Attorney General.
Page 35 last line, for 'in,' road on.
. 37, for offence,' read office
179, after the 'vord needle,' in the las. line, erase the period, insert a comua, and add the following words, viz:-making allowance for variation according to practical observation. Page 205 line 6, for • Circuit,' read District.
263 16, erase' when.'
17 of marginal pote, for recording,' read record.
476 10, for • Morris, Nicholson & Greenleaf,' read Morris & Nicholson. Page 480 line 24, for • That,' read The.
484 5, for interest,' read interests.
The following errata, in the opinion of CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL, in the case of the Venus, in volume 8, escaped notice until it was too late te correct them in the table of errata of that volume, viz :Page 298 line 37, for • facts,' read parts
311 20, for 'permanent, read prominent.
Adeline, sch, and cargo, 244 Fanny's cargo, U. S. v..
181 Arnold v. U, S. 104 Finley v Williams et al
164 Frances, The
G. Barber, U. S. v
243 Blas Moran, brig Alerta v. 359 Gettings v. Burck's administratrix, Brip Alerta v. Blas Moran, 359
372 Brig Ann, 289 Giles et al. U. S. v.
212 Brig Concord
387 Grotjus, The
180 Hazard's cargo v. Campbell 205
Law & Campbell, Pratt v. 456
Lewis's lessee v. M'Fariand 151 Donaldson, Randolpli v.
76 Drummond's Adininistrators v. Ma
M. gruder's trustees,
122 Dunham and Randolph's claim, 183 Magruder's trustees, Drummond's
Mandeville v: Union Bank, 9
126 Frans r. Jordan et al.
199 M.Csung's lessee, Meigs er nl. v. 11