4. Upon appeal from a judgment entered in equity, and like them most conte' upon the report of a referee, the court such averments as will, on being eithir 605 5. If the application for a removal is made on notice, those averments which are not ing; of fact as are necessary to sustain taken by the court as true, and as to those re- RENT. rent, either that the premises were anfit for occupancy or became out of repair ncement of the terri 181 breach of the landlord's covchan to re- pair. lord to repair, a parol promise to repa I, 503 repair, and therefore no rent due. 5. The old principle or rule," that the ce- crptance of rent under a lease, after reasserted, and the leading cases viewed. Ireland v. Vichols. being antagonistic to the current of an- 481 and as being in accordance with many cases cited, that hold substantially, “that rent may be paid and received under circumstances that clearly show that it was paid and received without the knowledge or supposition of either party that thereby the forfeiture was waived; or that it was paid and received ib. as a compensation for the use and profits of the land, and the intention of wair- court to which the application was made breach of a condition not to underlet the was but one underletting-held, that the act of forfeiture was single and indi- visible. The continuance of the same United States court is to set on foot the and thereby the forfeiture waived, can- ib. parties.” 8. In an action for rent due upon a written | 3. But even if such security was void, the lease executed by two of four defendants plaintiff' would not thereby acquire any ib. SPECIAL TERM. and heard only at the regular Special Term of this court, unless differently ordered by the judge holding such term. Mayor v. Apfel. order made by another, and hearing and deciding the subject-matter heard and considered by another judge, deprecated. ib. where the power is exercised should be very extreme and exceptional, and has never been tolerated in this court. ib. 929 SALE. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. 1. An instrument, although purporting to 1. In an action to compel the specific per- be an absolute sale, may be shown by formance of a written contract to trans- competent to show by parol that the contract, although purporting on its face to be a sale, was, nevertheless, intended as a mere security for the payment of a sum of money. Anthony v. Atkinson. 228 ib. 219 3. The following general rules are well the contract price nor on a ** quantum contracts for land, and actions for specific titled to receive substantially from his property for which he contracted, by the will enforce performance on his part; otherwise not. Beyer v. Marks. 715 hands of the sheriff by a person who has of a specific performance of a contract, 638 same in the decree. Compensation fol- lows as a matter of right, and must be provided for in the decree in all proper ib. ió. dence that compensation should have been cases. it. given, a failure of the court or referee 3. In a case where the liability is hy stat. ib. ordinary common-law remedies, and ex- clusive in its nature, the liability can be enforced only in the courts of the State manner provided by the act. of the common law, leaving each stol- pany in the same manner as if not incor- porated, and no particular or exclusive ib. forced in the courts of any State or ter- holder may be found. 5. So when an act of incorporation charges the stockholder with the payment of ib. 595 6. The stockholders of the “North-west- different action by being against the liable for the debts of that bank; noz ib. can a personal action be maintained in the courts of this State against either of them for any such indebtedness, 1. Upon proof that the plaintiff fraudu- lently made away with the specifications SURROGATE COURTS. in an order made by a surrogate rerok- ing letters testamentary, is not sufficient to show such jurisdiction. The People ex rel. Heyer v. Hartman. 516 467 2. Surrogate courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and jurisdiction must in all cases be shown, and cannot be intended. 1. The nature and character of the liability incurred by stockholders, in a joint- 3. If a proceeding before a surrogate is quired jurisdiction, then such jurisdic- 117 by the statute to confer jurisdiction must appear. of the act of incorporation, or may arise 4. A power to remove an executor is wholly ib. T matter of law upon this evidence, and to charge the jury in effect, that Any accept- ance or approval of the work done under the sub-contract by plaintiffs' engi- neer, no matter in what capacity or in what manner or for what purpose, re- lieved the sureties, although it did not 67 relieve the principal contractors from the entire machinery should successfully perform the stipulated service, and that this was so, if the acceptance took place pumps, and boilers provided that plain- authority derived solely from them, and missioners v. Burr. 25 by the provisions of their bond, that the contractors will perform and abide by any alterations which the parties to the contract may make therein, a direction to the jury contained in the general charge of the court, that if they come to the conclusion that material alterations have been made in the contract by the parties thereto, without the knowledge and con- sent of the sureties, or that there was any interference on the part of the plaintitt's without the consent of the sureties, to stop there and find a verdict for the de- fendants, without any qualification of the language at the time, although the court, prior to the general charge, had, on plaintiffs' motion, laid down a propo- sition containing the true rule of law- held, that the general charge, if not erroneous, was at least calculated to mis- lead the jury, and that a new trial should be granted upon that ground. ib. 202 not disturb a verdict. ib. ib. 339 sufficient, if credited, to authorize them to find a verdict for plaintiff, it is error to direct a verdict for defendant. Schanck v. Morris. 464 1 a party will not be allowed to represent is no bar to an action against one of snek 516 рап. . witness, and by pertinent questions call ench company is conclusive evidedea of ib. 5. When it is shown that a person had may at a proper time read the same in his acceptance will be presumed vency or non-user. Those are grosses for judicially declaring them disso red Dissolutions can be eliected only in toe manner prescribed by statute. sion of a corporation to make an annual ib. report, is in the nature of a peralty, and within the three years' limitation of action for penalties or forfeitures. ib. 9. And such liability attaches upon each defauit of the company, so long as the whether for the prosecution or the de- though there have been several sucressire fore suit brought, but the last was sitting ib. limitations is not a bar. exception to the refusal of the court to on each default, and if any of the de- under the general act for the incorpcrà- panies, being made liable, upon the default of the company to file an annual report, for the existing debts of the trustees of manufacturing companies for though they were contracted before he 003 415 the statute, is such debts as were due at ib. ib. given its promissory note, which, by its terms, was not due or payable untileifler the trustees of a mining company, to report--heid, not to be an existing debt ib. |