Argument of Mr. Evarts, One of the Counsel of the United States, Addressed to the Tribunal of Arbitration at Geneva on the 5th and 6th August, 1872, in Reply to the Special Argument of the Counsel of Her Britannic Majesty: Stenographic ReportChiswick Press, 1872 - 108페이지 |
도서 본문에서
12개의 결과 중 1 - 5개
4 페이지
... supposed , and have so in our Argument insisted , that all that long debate was concluded by what had been settled by definitive convention between the two nations as the law of this Tribunal 4 ARGUMENT OF MR . EVARTS .
... supposed , and have so in our Argument insisted , that all that long debate was concluded by what had been settled by definitive convention between the two nations as the law of this Tribunal 4 ARGUMENT OF MR . EVARTS .
18 페이지
... Supposing that the escape of the " Florida " from Liverpool , in the first instance , was not under circumstances which made it an injurious violation of neutrality for which Great Britain was responsible to the United States , that is ...
... Supposing that the escape of the " Florida " from Liverpool , in the first instance , was not under circumstances which made it an injurious violation of neutrality for which Great Britain was responsible to the United States , that is ...
21 페이지
... Suppose a ves- sel had escaped from Great Britain with or without due diligence being observed - take the case of the ' Florida ' or the ' Shenandoah ' - take either case . She puts into a port belonging to the British Crown . You ...
... Suppose a ves- sel had escaped from Great Britain with or without due diligence being observed - take the case of the ' Florida ' or the ' Shenandoah ' - take either case . She puts into a port belonging to the British Crown . You ...
22 페이지
... suppose the authorities at the port into which she puts are not aware of the circumstances under which the vessel originally left the shores of Great Britain . Is there an obligation to seize that vessel ? " - Mr. Evarts . That , like ...
... suppose the authorities at the port into which she puts are not aware of the circumstances under which the vessel originally left the shores of Great Britain . Is there an obligation to seize that vessel ? " - Mr. Evarts . That , like ...
27 페이지
... supposed obligation of courtesy or comity towards the offending belligerent . This courtesy , this comity , it is conceded , can be terminated at any time at the will of the neutral sovereign . But this comity or this courtesy has not ...
... supposed obligation of courtesy or comity towards the offending belligerent . This courtesy , this comity , it is conceded , can be terminated at any time at the will of the neutral sovereign . But this comity or this courtesy has not ...
자주 나오는 단어 및 구문
action applied argu armament and munitions armed authority base of naval Britain British Government British ports circumstances claims coaling conduct contraband of war course courts Crown dealing in contraband debate diligence to prevent discussion doctrine doctrine of comity due diligence eminent Counsel Evarts evasion Executive Executive Government exercise facts fault Foreign Enlistment Act furnish ground to believe hospitality hostile act hostile expedition illegal insisted interception international law judicial law of nations learned Counsel Majesty's Government matter means ment municipal law naval operations neutral nation neutral ports neutral territory neutre obligation offended neutral offending cruisers outfit parties port of Liverpool ports and waters prerogative principles proofs proposition proscribed reasonable ground regard resort responsibility right of asylum second clause second Rule Shenandoah ship Sir Alexander Cockburn Sir Roundell sovereign sovereignty special argument territoire Three Rules tion trality Treaty Treaty of Washington Tribunal unarmed United violation of neutrality want of due
인기 인용구
17 페이지 - First, to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a power with which it is at peace ; and also to use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war as above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use.
8 페이지 - In deciding the matters submitted to the Arbitrators they shall be governed by the following three rules, which are agreed upon by the High Contracting Parties as rules to be taken as applicable to the case...
9 페이지 - Government cannot assent to the foregoing rules as a statement of principles of international law which were in force at the time when the claims mentioned in Article I arose, but that her Majesty's Government, in order to evince its desire of strengthening the friendly relations between the two countries, and of making satisfactory provision for the future, agrees that in deciding the questions between the two countries arising out of those claims the arbitrators should assume that her Majesty's...
65 페이지 - Secondly, not to permit or suffer either belligerent to make use of its ports or waters as the. base of naval operations against the other, or for the purpose of the renewal or augmentation of military supplies or arms, or the recruitment of men. Thirdly, to exercise due diligence in its own ports and waters, and, as to all persons within its jurisdiction, to prevent any violation of the foregoing obligations and duties.
78 페이지 - We may have our own opinions about slavery; we may be for or against the South; but there is no doubt that Jefferson Davis and other leaders of the South have made an army; they are making, it appears, a navy; and they have made what is more than either, they have made a nation.4.
63 페이지 - It seems clear, on the principle enunciated in these authorities, that, except on the ground of any proved violation of the Foreign Enlistment Act, Her Majesty's Government cannot interfere with commercial dealings between British subjects and the so- sty led Confederate States, whether the subject of those dealings be money or contraband goods, or even ships adapted for warlike purposes.
13 페이지 - the first general maxim of interpretation is, that it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation.
89 페이지 - Why then, take no note of him, but let him go ; and presently call the rest of the watch together, and thank God you are rid of a knave.
95 페이지 - ... to prevent" the occurrence of any of the infractions of the law of nations proscribed by the rules. There are two propositions in these rules. Certain things are assigned as violations of the law of nations, and as involving a duty on the part of a neutral Government to prevent them; and besides in and towards preventing them it is its duty to use due diligence.
11 페이지 - ... optional character, while, in the future, the rules were to be authoritative, binding rules of the law of nations? When the United States had given an assent, by convention, to the law that was to govern this Tribunal, was it intended that that law should be construed, as to the past, differently from what it was to be construed in reference to the future? I apprehend that this learned Tribunal will at once dismiss this consideration, with all its important influence upon the whole subsequent...