Colin's Campus: Cambridge Life and the English Eclogue"Colin's Campus argues that pastoral poetry is inevitably a backwards-looking genre, preoccupied with the past. This preoccupation in the case of Spenser, as well as his pastoral followers, returned him to the Cambridge he had recently left behind, not the court to which he never really arrived." "Responding to the pastoral-court connection which has been at the center of nearly all historical considerations of pastoral for the past two decades, this study invites readers to seriously consider the reverse connection, that is, the academic ingredients in the pastoral world."--BOOK JACKET.Title Summary field provided by Blackwell North America, Inc. All Rights Reserved |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
28°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 3°³
122 ÆäÀÌÁö
Both Virgil and Spenser , Hamilton notes , were twenty - nine ( give or take two
years in Spenser ' s case ) when they completed their pastoral works . Hamilton '
s implication is that Milton , in writing ¡° Lycidas , ¡± was strictly imitating the pastoral
...
Both Virgil and Spenser , Hamilton notes , were twenty - nine ( give or take two
years in Spenser ' s case ) when they completed their pastoral works . Hamilton '
s implication is that Milton , in writing ¡° Lycidas , ¡± was strictly imitating the pastoral
...
134 ÆäÀÌÁö
Notes CHAPTER 1 . THE PASTORALIST ' S PAST 1 . Even before Paul McLane '
s 1961 study of historical allegory in Spenser ' s ¡° Shepheardes Calender " : A
Study in Elizabethan Allegory ( University of Notre Dame Press , 1961 ) ,
historical ...
Notes CHAPTER 1 . THE PASTORALIST ' S PAST 1 . Even before Paul McLane '
s 1961 study of historical allegory in Spenser ' s ¡° Shepheardes Calender " : A
Study in Elizabethan Allegory ( University of Notre Dame Press , 1961 ) ,
historical ...
143 ÆäÀÌÁö
Alpers notes that Johnson ¡° may be thought to have established the tradition that
excellent critics write weakly or perversely on this poem ¡± ( ¡° ' Lycidas ' and
Modern Criticism , " ELH 49 , no . 2 ( 1982 ) , 469 ) . 3 . As quoted by Joseph
Wittreich ...
Alpers notes that Johnson ¡° may be thought to have established the tradition that
excellent critics write weakly or perversely on this poem ¡± ( ¡° ' Lycidas ' and
Modern Criticism , " ELH 49 , no . 2 ( 1982 ) , 469 ) . 3 . As quoted by Joseph
Wittreich ...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
academic actual become Book calls Cambridge campus Chame chapter Colin Clout College comes common companion complaint concerns conventional conversation course court critics Cuddie death delights departure describes Eclogue English enjoy essentially fact familiar fashion fellowship fields fish fishers Fletcher friendship greater hand Harvey Hobbinol idyllic ingredients John joys King lament least leave less lines locus look loss lost Lycidas master meaning Milton nature nostalgic notes offers once otium paradise particular past pastoral poetry pastoral world perhaps pipe piscatory poem poet poet's poetic political present Queene reader recollection remains returned Rosalind says seen serves shade shared Shepheardes Calender shepherds shores sing song speaks Spenser stay steps student suggests swain tells Thenot things Thirsil Thomalin thou tion turned verse winter writes young youth