페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

Page

Page Stuckman v. Roose, 147 Ind. 402, 46 N. E. Thompson v. Maxwell, 168 U. S. 451, 18 824 Sup. Ct. 121, 42 L. Ed. 539..

100 Sturgis v. Boyer, 24 How. 110–121, 16 L. Tiernan v. Thurman, 14 B. Mon. 277. 543 Ed. 591

.558, 559 Tiffany v. Boatman's Inst., 18 Wall. 375, Stuyvesant v. Davis, 9 Paige, 427. 804 21 L. Ed. 868.

477 Sulz v. Ass'n, 145 V. Y. 503-565, 10 N. E. Tiffany v. Institution, 18 Wall. 376, 21 L. 212, 28 L. R, A. 379.. 291 Ed. 868

41 Sumner v. Hamlet, 12 Pick, 76.

932 Tiffany v. U. S., 50 C. C. A. 419, 112 Fed. Supreme Commandery v. Ainsworth, 71

672

87 Ala. 436, 413, 46 Am. Rep. 332.

291 | Tilghman v. Proctor, 102 U. S. 707, 26 L. Supreme Lodge v. Knight, 117 Ind. 489, 20 Ed. 279; 125 U. S. 136, 8 Sup. Ct. 894, E. 479, 3 L. R. A. 409. 291 31 L, Ed. 664

..357, 872 Sutton v. Tiller, 98 Am. Dec. 471. 449 Toby v. Allen, 3 Kan. 399.

256 Suvdam v. Broadpax, 14 Pet. 67, 10 L. Ed. Tod v. Union L. Co. (C. C.) 57 Fed. 52. 438 337

254 Toledo Brewing & Malting Co. v. Bosch, 41 Swarts v. Bank, 54 C. C. A. 387, 393, 117 C. C. A. 482, 101 Fed. 530.

566 Fed. 1

165 Tontine Surety Co., In re (D. C.) 116 Fed. Swarts v. Siegel, 54 C. C. A. 399, 117 Fed.

401

467 13

5 Tootle v. Coleman, 46 C. C. A. 132, 107 Sweeney r. Coffin, 1 Dill. 73, Fed. Cas. No. Fed. 44, 57 L. R. A. 120.

466 13.686

249 Topliff v. Topliff, 145 U. S. 156, 12 Sup. Sweeny v. Hanley, 61 C. C. A. 153, 126 Ct. 825, 36 L. Ed. 658...

204, 862 Fed. 102

100 | Torrence v. Shedd, 144 U. S. 527, 12 Sup. Swift, In re, 50 C. C. A. 264, 112 Fed. 315 Ct. 726, 36 L. Ed. 528...

.442, 444 360, 364 Town of Eldora v. Burlingame, 62 Iowa, Swiftsure, The, 29 Fed. 462. 686 32, 17 N. W. 148..

570 S. W. V'a. Imp. Co. v. Frari, 7 C. C. A. Treadway v. Wilder, 12 Nev. 108.

126 149, 58 Fed. 172

590 Treat v. Ins. Co., 203 Pa. 21, 52 Atl. 60.. 712

Treat Mfg. Co. v. Iron_Co., 157 U. S. 674, Tacoma Ry. & Power Co. v. Hayes, 49 15 Sup. Ct. 718, 39 L. Ed. 853..

158 C. C. A. 115, 110 Fed. 496..

108 Trenton Terra Cotta Co. v. Shingle Co. (C. Tallman v. Railroad Co. (C. C.) 45 Fed. 156 465 C.) 80 Fed. 46..

670 Tancarville, The, 45 Fed. 903. 686, 687 Trimble v. Woodhead, 102 U. S. 647, 26 L. Tayloe v. Sandiford, 7 Wheat. 13, 5 L. Ed. Ed. 290

921 381 547 Troop, The (D. C.) 118 Fed. 769.

110 Taylor v. Ass'n, 68 Ala, 229.

543 Turley v. Railroad Co. (N. H.) 47 Atl. 261 313 Tavlor , Insurance Co., 13 Gray Mass.) Turner v. State, 78 Ga. 177..

905 34, 438

290 Tyler Min, Co. v. Mining Co., 32 C. C. A. Taylor v. Porter, 4 Hill, 140, 40 Am. Dec.

498, 90 Fed. 21..

104 27+

913 Tynan v. Walker, 35 Cal. 634, 95 Am. Dec. Teese r. Phelps, 1 McAll. 17, Fed. Cas. No.

152

256 13,818

695 Territory v. Barth (Ariz.) 15 Pac. 673. 904 Udell v. Peak (Tex. Sup.) 7 S. W. 786. 126 Texas Pac. R. Co. v. Cox, 145 U. S. 593, Uhlman v. Insurance Co., 109 N. Y. 433, 12 Sup. Ct. 905, 36 L. Ed. 829.

158 17 N. E. 363, 4 Am. St. Rep. 482... 303 Texas & Pac, R. Co. v. Hayden (Tex. Civ. Umbria, The, 166 U. S. 417, 17 Sup. Ct. App.) 26 S. W. 331.. 312 615, 41 L. Ed. 1033.

831 Thackrah v. Haas, 119 U. S. 499, 7 Sup. Unger v. Leiter, 32 Ohio St. 210.

823 Ct. 311. 30 L. Ed. 486.

805 Union Bank v. Vaiden, 18 How. 503, 15 L. Thames Steamboat Co. v. Railroad Co., 63

Ed. 472

254 Am. Dec. 154

132 Union Pac. R. Co. v. Harris, 12 C. C. A. Tha yer v. Ass'n, 112 U. S. 717, 5 Sup. Ct.

598, 63 Fed. 803,

785 Ct. 355, 28 L. Ed. 861..

455 Union Paper Bag Co. v. Murphy, 97 U. S. Thayer v. Hart (C. C.) 20 Fed. 693. 862 121, 24 L. Ed. 935.

893 Third Nat. Bank v. Gordon (C. C.) 53 Fed. Union Steam Pump Co. v. Pump Co., 43 C. +71 103 C. A. 560, 104 Fed. 342.

894 Thomas v. Board, 195 U. S. 207, 25 Sup. Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Railroad Co. Ct. 21, 49 L. Ed. 495 (C. C.) 69 Fed. 833.

479 Thomas v. Brockenbrough, 10 Wheat. 146, U. S. v. Alexander, 148 U. S. 186, 13 Sup. 6 L. Ed. 287.. 381 Ct. 529, 37 L. Ed. 415..

285 Tiomas v. Mfg. Co. (C. C.) 111 Fed. 923.. 212 U. S. v. Arredondo, 6 Pet. 743, 8 L. Ed. Thomas v. Scutt, 127 N. Y. 133, 27 N. E.

547

128 994 U. S. v. Arwo, 19 Wall. 486, 22 L. Ed. 67 64 Thomas v. Wannamaker, 63 C. C. A. 594, U. S. v. Baker, 5 Blatchf. 6, Fed. Cas. No. 1:29 Fed. 92. 775 14.501

64 Toomas Fielden, The, 32 Law Journal, 61, U. S. v. Bank, 104 U. S. 728, 734, 26 L. 962 Ed. 908

.329, 330 Thompson v. Fairbanks, 196 U. S. 516, 23 U. S. v. Beebe, 180 U. S. 313, 354, 21 Sup. Sep. Ct. 306, 49 L. Éd.

941 Ct. 371, 371, 43 L. Ed. 503. ..381, 787 Thompson v. Insurance Co., 136 U. S. 293, L'. S. r. Felvin (C. C.) 46 Fed. 383. 901

10 Sup. Ct. 1019, 34 L. Ed. 408. 670 | U. S. Beruard (C. C.) 81 Fed. 634...

[ocr errors]

Page

Page U. S. v. Benson (C. C.) 31 Fed. 896...

U. S. v. Noelke (C. C.) 1 Fed. 426.. 612

902, 903, 910 U. S. v. Xorthway, 120 U. S. 327, 332, 334, U. S. v. Binney, 27 C. C. A. 347, 82 Fed. 7 Sup. Ct. 580, 30 L, Ed. 661...

613 992

766 V. S. v. 129 Packages, Fed. Cas. No. 15,911 H9 U. S. v. Bird, 1 Spr. 299, Fed. Cas. No. 14,- U. S. v. Oteri, 14 C. Ć. A. 314, 67 Fed. 146 547 597

63 | U. S. v. Ottman, 1 Hughes, 313, Fed. Cas. U. S. v. Boom Co., 176 U. S. 211, 20 Sup. No. 15,977

466 Ct. 334, 44 L. Ed. 437..

.15, 48 U. S. v. Phillips (D. C.) 46 Fed. 466.. 811 U. S. Brazeau (C. C.) 78 Fed. 461. 611 U. S. v. Pingree, 1 Spr. 339, Fed. Cas. No. U. S. v. Britton, 107 U. S. 655, 661, 669, 2

16,050

547 Sup. Ct. 512, 27 L. Ed. 520; 108 U. S. U. S. v. Railroad Co., 160 U. S. 668, 675, 199, 2 Sup. Ct. 531, 27 L. Ed. 698.

679, 680, 685, 16 Sup. Ct. 427, 131, 40 L. 581, 643, 656 Ed. 576...

.276, 279, 281, 281 U. S. v. Brown, 1 Sawy. 533, Fed. Cas. No. U. S. v. Ranche Co. (C. C.) 26 Fed. 218... 161 14.671

907 | U. $. v. Ranlett, 172 U. S. 133, 10 Sup. Ct. U. S. v. Budd, 144 U. S. 154, 12 Sup. Ct.

114, 43 L. Ed. 393..

.971, 972 575, 36 L. Ed. 384.

97 | U. S. v. Reed, 2 Blatchf. 435, Fed. Cas. U. S. v. Burr, 159 U. S. 78, 15 Sup. Ct. No. 16,134

908 1002, 40 L. Ed. 82.

509 U. S. v. Reeves, Fed. Cas. No. 16,139, 3 U. S. v. Carll, 105 U. S. 611, 612, 26 L. Ed. Woods, 199

.901, 902 1135 .581, 643, 651 U. S. v. Reiss, 136 Fed. 741

745 U. S. v. Clune (D. C.) 62 Fed. 798.

909 U. S. v. Royall, 3 Cranch, C. C. 618, Fed. U. S. v. Cobban (C. C.) 127 Fed. 713.. 907 Cas. No. 16,201..

647 U.S. y. Cook, 17 Wall. 168, 174, 21 L. Ed. U. S. v. Simmons, 96 U. S. 360, 24 L. Ed.

.641, 643
819

.381, 582, 614 U. S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542, 557, 558, U. S. v. Smith (D. C.) 45 Fed. 561..

55 559, 23 L. Ed. 588.

U. S. v. Stoddard, S9 Fed. 699; 34 C. C. 641, 643, 652, 656, 638, 659 A, 175, 91 Fed. 1005.

970 U. S. v. Cutajar, 14 C. C. A. 515, 67 Fed. U. S. v. Strauss (C. C.) 128 Fed. 473. 267 530

548 U. S. v. Strauss Bros. & Co., 136 Fed. 185 267 U. S. v. Danbridge, 12 Wheat. 64, 6 L. Ed. U. S. v. Tallman, 10 Blatchf. 21, Fed. Cas. 552 906 No. 16,429

908 U. S. v. Doherty (D. C.) 27 Fed. 730. 812 U. S. v. Terry (D. C.) 39 Fed. 33S. 905 U. S. v. Driggs (C. C.) 125 Fed. 520.. 645, 651 U. S. v. Thompson, 1 Sumn. 168, Fed. Cas. U. S. v. Eagan (C. C.) 30 Fed. 612....901, 909 No. 16,492

63 U. S. v. Eaton, 144 U. S. 677, 12 Sup. Ct. U. S. v. Throckmorton, 98 U. S. 61-66, 25 764, 36 L. Ed. 591. 652 L. Ed. 93

384 U. S. v. Fero (D. C.) 18 Fed. 901.

041 U. S. v. Truesdell, 148 U. S. 196, 13 Sup. U. S. v. Green, Fed. Cas. No. 15,256. 946 Ct. 532, 37 L. Ed. 419

285 U. S. v. Halberstadt, Fed. Cas. No. 15,276 132 U. S. v. Tuska, 14 Blatchf. 5, Fed. Cas. U. S. v. Harris (D, C.) 68 Fed. 317... 55 No. 16,550

908 U. S. v. Hatch, 1 Paine, 336, Fed. Cas. U. S. v. Van Schaick (C. C.) 134 Fed. 592 939 No. 15,325

547 | U. S. v. Vowell, 5 Cranch, 368, 3 L. Ed. U. S. v. Hess, 124 U. S. 483, 486, 8 Sup.

128

972 Ct. 571, 31 L. Ed. 516..56, 581, 641, 650, 658 U. S. v. Watson (D. C.) 17 Fed. 115. 642 U. S. v. Iselin, 87 Fed. 194; 36 C. C. A. U. S. v. Willey, 11 Walí. 508, 20 L, Ed. 211 235 681, 95 Fed. 1007.

970 | United States Graphite Co. v. Graphite Co. U. S. v. Jenkins, 26 Fed. Cas. 603. 519 (C. C.) 68 Fed. 412..

508 U. S. v. Kaufman, 96 U. S. 567, 24 L. Ed. United States Shipbuilding Co. v. Conklin, 792

..329, 330 60 C. C. A. 680, 126 Fed. 132.. .1009 U. S. v. Lee, 106 U. S. 196, 1 Sup. Ct. 210, Universal Winding Co. v. Linen Co., 82 27 L. Ed. 171

1003 Fed. 228; 92 Fed. 391, 34 C. C. A. 415.. 880 U. S. v. Legg, 45 C. C. A. 131, 105 Fed. 930

970 | Van Buren v. Digges, 52 U. S. 461, 476, 13 U. S. v. Leonard, 47 C. C. A. 181, 108 Fed.

L. Ed. 771

549 42

766 Vastbinder, Matter of (D. C.) 126 Fed. 418 109 U. S. v. Loeb (C. C.) 99 Fed. 723, 46 C. C. Veendam, The, 46 Fed. 489.

687 A. 562, 107 Fed. 692.

809 | Venner v. F. L. & T. Co., 33 C. C. A. 95, U. S. v. Long (D. C.) 68 Fed. 318.

90 Fed. 319

823 U. S. v. Lynah, 188 U, S. 44, 23 Sup. Ct. Verrier v. Guillan, 97 Pa. 63.

798 349, 47 L. Ed. 539..

329 Vicksburg & M. R. v. O'Brien, 119 U. S. U. S. v. Manufacturing Co., 112 U. S. 645, 93, 7 Sup. Ct. 118, 30 L. Ed. 299., 343

5 Sup. Ct. 306, 28 L. Ed. 816.. .283, 329 | Village of Kent v. Dana, 40 C. C. A. 281, U. S. v. Mills, 7 Pet. 138, 142, 8 L. Ed.

100 Fed. 56

571 036

.641, 643 | Virginia Ehrman, The, 97 U. S. 313, 24 L. U. S. v. Montell, Taney, 47, Fed. Cas. No.

Ed. 890

539 15,798

548 Volkman v. Railroad Co. (Dak.) 37 N. W. U. S. v. Morrison, 179 U. S. 456, 461, 21

731

108 Sup. Ct. 195, 45' L. Ed. 275

747 | Vosburgh v. Diefendorf, 119 N. Y, 357, 23 U. S. v. Murphy, 136 Fed. 811. 809 N. E. 801, 16 Am. St. Rep. 836..

430

55

Page

Page Wabash R, Co. v. Trust Co. (C. C.) 23 Fed. Western Union Tel. Co. v. McKibben, 114 738 504 Ind. 511, 14 N. E. 891..

501 Wabash Western Railroad v. Brow, 164 U. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Poe (C. C.) 64 S. 271, 17 Sup. Ct. 126, 41 L. Ed. 431. 131 Fed. 9

731 Wade v. Lumber Co., 20 C. C. A. 515, 74 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Schriver, 64 C. Fed. 517, 33 L. R. A. 253.

163
C. A. 96, 129 Fed. 314..

500 Wade v. Railroad Co., 149 U. S. 327, 13 Westhoff v. Oluf, 3 Woods, 667, Fed. Cas. Sup. Ct. 892, 37 L. Ed. 755.. 526 No, 17,449

559 Wade v. Travis, 26 C. C. A. 589, 81 Fed. Westinghouse Mfg. Ço. v. Electric Co., 38 712 730 C. C. A. 65, 97 Fed. 99..

215 Wadsworth v. Telegraph Co., 86 Tenn. 695, West River Bridge Co. v. Dix, 6 How. 507, SS. W. 574, 6 Am. St. Rep. 864.. 501 12 L. Ed. 535

280 Wailes v. Cooper, 24 Miss. 208.

543 West St. Louis Bank v. Bank, 95 U. S. Walden v. Skinner, 101 U. S. 577, 25 L. 557, 24 L. Ed: 490

427 Ed. 963 670 Wetmore, The Chas., 51 Fed. 449.

688 Waldron, In re, 13 Johns. 419.

947 Wheeler v. Nesbitt, 24 How. 511, 16 L. Walker v. Kee, 14 S. C. 142. 431 Ed. 765

628 Walker v. Moser, 54 C. C. A. 262, 117 Fed. Wheelock v. Kost, 77 Ill. 296.

979 230 173 Whelan v. McCreary, 64 Ala. 319.

543 Walker v. Sauvinet, 92 U. S. 90, 23 L. Ed. White v. Griffing, 44 Conn. 437, 446, 447.. 363 678 913 White Lee (C. C.) 3 Fed. 222

607 Walker v. Walker, 9 Wall. 745, 19 L. Ed. White v. Timber Co. (D. C.) 116 Fed. 768 814 254

80, 81 Wall, Ex parte, 107 U. S. 265, 2 Sup. Ct. Whitehead v. Patterson, 88 Ga. 748, 16 S. 569, 27 L, Ed, 552.. 913 E. 66

.387, 388 Walla Walla City v. Water Co., 172 U. S. Whitely v. Fadner (C. C.) 73 Fed. 486.... 207

1, 19 Sup. Ct. 77, 43 L. Ed. 341.. 729 | Whiting v. Bank, 13 Pet. 6, 10 L. Ed. 33.. 381 Waller v. Jones, 107 Ala. 331, 18 South. Whitmore v. Supreme Lodge, 100 Mo. 36– 277 541 47, 13 S. W. 495.

295 Wallis v. State, 54 Ark. 611, 16 S. W. 821 904 Whitney v. Olsen, 47 C. C. A. 331, 108 Wanser y. Wyckoff, 9 Hun, 178. 628 Fed. 292

110 Ward v. Cochran, 150 U. S. 597, 14 Sup. Whitson v. Phonograph Co., 18 App. D. C. Ct. 230, 37 L. Ed. 1195.. 128 565

602, 606 Warren v. Burt, 7 C. C. A. 105, 58 Fed. Wickelman v. A. B. Dick Co., 31 C. C. 101-106

357
A. 530, 88 Fed. 264.

862 Washington, etc., Packet Co. v. Sickles, 24 Wiggins v. Burkham, 10 Wall. 129, 19 L. How, 333, 16 L. Ed. 650.. .555, 556 Ed, 884

798 Washington Gas Light Co. v. Lapsder, 172 Wight, In re, 134 U. S. 136, 10 Sup. Ct.

C. S. 534, 19 Sup. Ct. 296, 43 L. Ed. 513 132 487, 33 L. Ed. 865.
Watkins, Ex parte, 3 Pet. 193, 7 L. Ed. 650 447 Wilkinson v. Dobbie, 12 Blatchf. 298, Fed.
Watt v. Wright. 66 Cal. 206, 5 Pac. 91.. 73 Cas. No. 17,670

696 Waverly, The, 78 Fed. 191.

687 | Williams v. Bank, 29 C. C. A. 203, 85 Fed. Weibold v. Davis, 7 Mont. 107, 14 Pac. 865 128 376

980 Weir v. Gas Co. (C. C.) 91 Fed. 910...306, 712 Williams v. Insurance Co. (C. C.) 24 Fed. Weisgerber v. Clowney (C. C.) 131 Fed. 477 215 625, 626; 97 Mo. App. 419, 71 S. W. 377 Welling, In re, 7 Am. Bankr. Rep. 340, 51

98, 293 C. C. A. 151, 113 Fed. 189.

..820 Williams v. Lumber Co. (C. C.) 113 Fed. Wellington, The, 52 Fed. 605. 686 382

103 Wells v. Sioux Falls (S. D.) 94 N. W. 425 Williams v. State, 69 Ga. 12.

901 730, 732, 733 Williamson v. Brown, Smith (N. Y.) 354.. 513 Wells County v. McHenry, 7 N. D. 246, 74 Williamson v. Jones, 43 W. Va. 562, 27 S. N. W. 241

531 E. 411, 38 L. R. A. 694, 64 Am. St. Rep. Wentworth v. French, 176 Mass. 442, 57

891

5 N. E. 789

979 Wilson v. Haley Co., 153 U. S. 39, 43, 14 West v. McConnell, 25 Am. Dec. 195, note 696 Sup. Ct. 768, 38 L. Ed. 627.

84 West v. Telegraph Co., 39 Kan. 93, 17 Pac. Wilson v. McCullough, 23 Pa. 440, 62 Am. 807, 7 Am. St. Rep. 530.. 501 Dec. 347

543 Western Telephone Co. v. Telephone Co. Wilson v. Milliken (Ky.) 44 S. W. 660, 42 1C. C. A.) 131 Fed. 78..

854

L. R. A. 419, 82 Am. St. Rep. 578.. 696 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Adams, 75 Tex. Wilson v. Oswego Tp., 151 U. S. 56, 62,

531, 12 S. W. 857, 6 L. R. A. 814, 16 Am. 14 Sup. Ct. 239, 38 L. Ed. 70..405, 442, 443 St. Rep. 920.

501 | Wilson v. Railroad Co., 120 N. Y. 145, 150, Western Union Tel. Co. v. Coffin, 88 Tex. 24 N. E. 35+, 17 Am. St. Rep. 625.. 91. 30 S. W. 896..

501

426, 431, 432 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Culberson, 79 Wilson v. Ranch Co., 20 C. C. A. 241, 73 Tex, 65, 15 S. W. 219.. 501 Fed. 994

26 Western Union Tel. Co. V. Fenton,

Wilson v. Rousseau, 45 Ū. S. 616, 11 L. Ind. 1 501 Ed. 1141

613 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Hall, 124 U. S. Wilson v. Trust Co., 52 C. C. A. 374, 114 414456, 8 Sup. Ct. 577, 31 L. Ed. 479.. 502 Fed. 712

361

30

52

Page

Page Wilson v. Wall, 34 Ala. 288-305.. 543 Woodfin v. Insurance Co., 51 N. C. 558.... 291 Wilson v. Winchester (C. C.) 30 Fed. 204.. 511 Worcester Co., In re, 4 Am. Bankr. Rep. Winifred, The, 102 Fed. 988..

688 501, 42 C. C. A. 637, 102 Fed. 808.. 36 Wisconsin, 30 Fed. 879.

688 Wormley v. Wormley, 8 Wheat. 421, 451, Wise v. Withers, 3 Cranch, 331, 2 L. Ed. 5 L. Ed. 651

442 457

447 Worthington v. Boston (C. C.) 41 Fed. 23 791 Wiswall v. Campbell, 93 U. S. 318, 23 L. Wright v. Oakley, 5 Metc. (Mass.) 400, 406 143 Ed. 923

913 Wright v. U. S. Mortgage Co., 42 S. W. Witherell v. Wiberg, 4 Sawy. 232, Fed.

789

24 Cas. No. 17,917..

77 W. & A. Rd. Co. v. Robertson, 9 C. C. A. Witthaus v. Zimmerman, 11 Am. Bankr. 646, 61 Fed. 592

574 Rep. 314, 316, 86 N. Y. Supp. 315. 363 Wolf v. Railroad Co., 195 Pa. 91, 45 Atl. Yeatman v. Savings Inst., 95 U. S. 764, 936 712 22 L. Ed. 589

923 Wolf v. Stix, 99 U. S. 8, 25 L. Ed. 309.. 389 Yell v. Snow, 24 Ark. 554

500 Wood y. Davis, 18 How. 467, 475, 15 L. Young v. Black, 7 Cranch, 565, 3 L. Ed. Ed. 460 442 440

555 Wood v. Goodridge, 52 Am. Dec. 771. 132 Young v. Wolfe (C. C.) 120 Fed. 956, 958 Wood v. Trust Co., 128 U. S. 416, 9 Sup.

860, 861 Ct. 131, 32 L Ed. 472.

823 Youtsey v. Hoffman (C. C.) 108 Fed. 693, 698

445

[ocr errors]

CASES

ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS AND THE

CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT COURTS.

GERMAN SAVINGS & LOAN SOC. v. TULL et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 6, 1905.)

No. 1,096.
1. FEDERAL COURTS-JURISDICTION-SUIT FOR PARTITION.

A suit for partition is a local action within the provisions of Act March 3, 1875, c. 137, & 8, 18 Stat. 472 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 513), and one in which any question between any of the parties, plaintiffs or defendants, affecting their rights or interests in the land may be put in issue and determined ; and a federal court is not without jurisdiction because questions may arise between plaintiffs who are citizens of the same state, nor will it make a realignment of parties to defeat its jurisdiction because such questions may arise, where the bill, although properly setting out the interest of each party in the premises, does not dis

close any controversy which renders it necessary. 2. ABATEMENT-ANOTHER ACTION PENDING-FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS.

The pendency of a suit in a state court cannot be pleaded in bar of a suit between the same parties on the same cause of action in a federal court.

(Ed. Note.-For cases in point, see vol. 1, Cent. Dig. Abatement and Revival, 88 87-92.

Pendency of action in state or federal court as ground for abatement of action in the other, see note to Bunker Hill & Sullivan M. & C. Co. v.

Shoshone M. Co., 47 C. C. A. 205.) 3. Res JUDICATA-VALIDITY OF JUDGMENT-AFFIRMANCE IN DIRECT PROCEED

INGS.

Where a question as to the validity of a judgment of the Supreme Court of a state was raised in such court by a petition for rehearing, and decided adversely to the petitioner, who thereupon removed the case to the Supreme Court of the United States by writ of error, where the same question was raised, and the judgment of the state court was affirmed, such question is res judicata, and cannot be again raised collater

ally between the parties. 4. SAME-MATTERS CONCLUDED BY JUDGMENT.

The heirs of a deceased wife brought suit in a state court to recover a half interest in certain real estate as community property in which their mother's interest descended to them. At the time of her death plaintiffs were minors, and their interests in the property were thereafter sold and conveyed by their guardian to their father under an order

136 F.-1

« 이전계속 »