Handbook of Research in Trans-Atlantic AntitrustThe book is handsomely produced by Edward Elgar. . . The notes contain more than citations and are well worth reading. A welcome feature is that after each set of notes there is a list of the most important writings on the topic followed by a list of the |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
96 ÆäÀÌÁö
ÀÌ µµ¼¿¡ ´ëÇØ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÆäÀÌÁö Çѵµ¿¡ µµ´ÞÇϼ̽À´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ µµ¼¿¡ ´ëÇØ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÆäÀÌÁö Çѵµ¿¡ µµ´ÞÇϼ̽À´Ï´Ù.
104 ÆäÀÌÁö
ÀÌ µµ¼¿¡ ´ëÇØ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÆäÀÌÁö Çѵµ¿¡ µµ´ÞÇϼ̽À´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ µµ¼¿¡ ´ëÇØ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÆäÀÌÁö Çѵµ¿¡ µµ´ÞÇϼ̽À´Ï´Ù.
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
¸ñÂ÷
1 | |
16 | |
41 | |
Tweedledum and Tweedledee? Regime dynamics in US and EC merger control | 72 |
A transatlantic assessment of the evolving use of behavioural merger remedies | 108 |
Judicial review of mergers in Europe Tetra Laval GEHoneywell and the convergence toward US standards | 153 |
Discounts rebates and selective pricing by dominant firms a transAtlantic comparison | 195 |
A dominant firms duty to deal EC and US antitrust law compared | 236 |
Issues relating to the enforcement and application of criminal laws in respect of competition | 466 |
The brave new world of extradition a North Atlantic treaty alliance against cartels? | 493 |
Lessons learned from the US experience in private enforcement of competition laws | 515 |
The role of nonlitigation strategies advocacy reports and studies as instruments of competition policy | 541 |
Information please opening antitrust to the public why more European Union Court and Commission documents and hearings should no longer be se... | 552 |
The goals of antitrust thoughts on consumer welfare in the US | 566 |
Competition enforcement and consumers | 594 |
The distributional consequences of antitrust | 605 |
Tying a transatlantic perspective | 287 |
Abuse of dominance enforcement under Latin American competition laws | 319 |
Substantial convergence the US influence on the development of the regulatory framework for IP licensing in the EC | 335 |
The right balance of competition policy and intellectual property law a Federal Trade Commission perspective | 356 |
Compulsory access as an antitrust remedy when why and how is it applied in EU and US law? | 398 |
Regulation in Brazil retrospect and prospects | 414 |
Regulatory and competition issues in the transatlantic air transport sector towards a transatlantic open aviation area | 444 |
Merger control and crossborder transactions a pragmatic view on cooperation convergence and what is in between | 622 |
Bilateral enforcement cooperation agreements | 641 |
An antitrust analysis of the World Trade Organizations decision in the USMexico arbitration on telecommunications services | 679 |
Mexicos competition law North American origins European practice | 718 |
Competition policies in Latin America postWashington Consensus | 732 |
Index | 759 |
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
abuse affect agreements analysis anticompetitive effects Antitrust Law apply approach Article 82 assessment behavioural remedies benefits Canada cartel CMLR Commission¡¯s companies competition authorities Competition Bureau competition law competition policy competitors conduct conflict consumers cooperation costs criminal customers decision defined definition different difficult discounts divestiture dominant firm EC merger economic effects efficiency efforts enforcement European Commission European Union exclusionary exclusive extradition Federal Trade Commission final finding firm first Guidelines Ibid influence infringement issues jurisdiction Justice licensing litigation market power market share ment merger control Merger Regulation merging Mexico Microsoft monopoly monopsony negotiations notification offence offered officials parties patent PeopleSoft plaintiff potential practice profits reflect refusal regime regulatory relevant restrictions rules sector Sherman Act significant specific standard sufficient suppliers telecommunications Telmex Tetra Laval tion transaction Treaty tying unilateral effects United Washington Consensus
Àαâ Àο뱸
302 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... making the conclusion of. contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.
454 ÆäÀÌÁö - Member States shall take all appropriate measures, whether general or particular, to ensure fulfilment of the obligations arising out of this Treaty or resulting from action taken by the institutions of the Community. They shall facilitate the achievement of the Community's tasks. They shall abstain from any measure which could jeopardise the attainment of the objectives of this Treaty.
246 ÆäÀÌÁö - In the absence of any purpose to create or maintain a monopoly, the act does not restrict the long recognized right of trader or manufacturer engaged in an entirely private business, freely to exercise his own independent discretion as to parties with whom he will deal; and of course, he may announce in advance the circumstances under which he will refuse to sell.
73 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... where in any line of commerce or in any activity affecting commerce in any section of the country, the effect of such acquisition...
265 ÆäÀÌÁö - Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States.
190 ÆäÀÌÁö - The reviewing court shall: (1) compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed; and (2) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be — (a) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law...
267 ÆäÀÌÁö - United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 US 563, 571, 576 (1966).* Mr. Justice DOUGLAS: The offense of monopoly under ¡× 2 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) the willful acquisition or maintenance of that power as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident.
249 ÆäÀÌÁö - Articles 85 and 86, it follows that an undertaking which has a dominant position in the market in raw materials and which, with the object of reserving such raw material for manufacturing its own derivatives, refuses to supply a customer, which is itself a manufacturer of these derivatives, and therefore risks eliminating all competition on the part of this customer, is abusing its dominant position within the meaning of Article 86.
178 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... it will ordinarily be enough that the plaintiff has raised questions going to the merits so serious, substantial, difficult and doubtful, as to make them a fair ground for litigation and thus for more deliberate investigation.
254 ÆäÀÌÁö - Co. was not motivated by efficiency concerns and that it was willing to sacrifice short-run benefits and consumer goodwill in exchange for a perceived long-run impact on its smaller...