페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

Quarterly Digest.

BY

C. H. LOMAX, M.A., OF THE INNER TEMPLE, BARRISTER-AT-LAW.

INDEX

of the cases reported during May, June, and July, 1895.

Where a case has already been given in the Digest for a preceding
quarter, the additional report is given after the name of the case,
with a reference to the volume of the Digest in which it first
appeared, the thick number being the number of the volume.

[blocks in formation]

117, viii.

Aitken v. McMeckan, 125, i.
Alexandre v. Brassard, 99, iv.
Alliott v. Smith, 114, vi.

Allport v. Securities Co., 106, v.
Anderson v. A. (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B.
749; 64 L.J. Q.B. 457; 72 L.T. 313),
20, 71, vi.

Andrews v. Nott-Bower, 108, iv.
Atlantic and North-Western Rail-
way Co. v. Wood (L.R. [1895] A.C.
257), 20, 67, iv.
Attenborough v. Henschel (L.R.
[1895] 1 Q.B. 833), 20, 70, vii.
A.-G. v. Jacobs Smith (64 L.J. Q.B.
270), 20, 54, i.

v. Lloyd (64 L.J. Q.B. 365),
20, 86, vi.

v. North Metropolitan Tram-
ways Co., 114, v.

BAKER V. STONE, 124, iv.

Bank of S. Australia, re, 102, iv.
Bankruptcy Notice, re, 97, i.
Barnett v. Hickmott ((L.R. [1895]
1 Q.B. 690; 64 L.J. Q.B. 407), 20,
86, ii.

Barry, &c., Local Board v. Parry,
110, vi.

Bartlett v. Ford's Hotel Co., 96, iii.
Bates v. Plumstead Overseers, 112, iii.
Baynes v. Lloyd, 108, i.

Baxter v. France (64 L.J. Q.B. 335),
20, 83, ix.

Baxter v. France (64 L.J. Q.B. 337),
20, 83, x.

Beauclerk v. B., 106, iv.
Beaver v. Master in Equity (L.R.
[1895] A.C. 251), 20, 86, vii.
Bird v. St. Mary Abbott's Vestry,
110, i.

Bishop v. Smyrna Railway Co.,
102, v.

Black v. Dawson, 116, i.
v. Williams, 119, i.
Blue Bell, the, 118, iii.
Board of Trade, e. p.; re Hedley,
98, ii.

v. Provident Clerks
Guarantee Association, 98, iv.
Bolton v. Curre, 121, vi.
Bona, the (64 L.J. P. 62), 20, 89, iii.
Bonhote v. Henderson, 118, ii.
Booth v. Arnold (64 L.J. Q.B. 443;
72 L.T. 310), 20, 90, vi.
Botten v. City and Suburban Build-
ing Society, 99, i.

Bower v. Goodman, 124, vi.
v. Hett, 96, vi.

&c.,

Bowling & Welby, re, 101, v.
Brocklesby v. Temperance,
Building Society, 116, ii.
Brophy v. A.-G. for Manitoba (L.R.
[1895] A.C. 202), 20, 67, v.
Brothwood v. Keeling, 95, i.

Brown, Janson & Co. v. Hutchinson,
113, ii., iii.

Bryant, e. p.; re B. (64 L.J. Q.B.
417), 20, 66, ii.

Burdekin, re, 119, v.
Burlington, the, 118, vi.

Bury v. Thompson (L.R. [1895] 1
Q.B. 696; 64 L.J. Q.B. 257), 20,
76, i.

CALHAM V. SMITH (64 L.J. Ch. 325),
20, 93, vi.

Canterbury (Mayor of) v. Wyburn
(64 L.J. P.C. 36; 43 W.R. 430),
20, 67, iii.

Cartwright v. Regan, 98, vii.
Casgrain v. Atlantic and North-
Western Railway, 99, iii.
Chartered Bank of India, &c. v.
Macfadyen (64 L.J. Q.B. 367; 72
L.T. 428), 20, 64, iii.

Chichester v. Quatrefages, 124, vii.
Chilton v. Progress Printing, &c.,
Co., 103, iii.

Chipperfield v. Carter, 120, iii.
Clacton Local Board v. Young (64

L.J. M.C. 124), 20, 77, v.
Clayton v. Barclay, 123, iii.
Combridge v. Harrison, 104, v.
Cook's Mortgage, re, 122, v.
Cooke, goods of (43 W.R. 428), 20,
64, i.

Cooper v. Stephens (64 L.J. Ch. 403;

72 L.T. 390; 43 W.R. 444) 20,
70, v.
County Estates Co. V. Graves
(64 L.J. P.C. 44) 20, 68, ii.
Cunnack v. Edwards (64 L.J. Ch.
344; 72 L.T. 386), 20, 73, ii.

DEARBERG V. LATCHFORD, 104, ii.
Deeley's Patent, re, 113, iv.
Densham's Trade Mark, re, 121, iii.
Derby, Mayor of, v. Grudgings
(72 L.T. 594), 20, 13, iii.
Dickson v. Law, 115, vii.

Dodds v. South Shields Assessment
Committee, 113, v.

Dolcini v. D., 98, vi.

Downes v. Johnson, 105, ii.
Dyer v. Munday, 111, vi.

[blocks in formation]

Fairtlough v. Whitmore, 105, iv.
Farmer v. Waterloo and City Rail-
way Company (64 L.J. Ch. 338),
20, 85, v.

Flood v. Jackson, 111, vii.
Forget v. Ostigny, 105, iii.
Formby and Holmes, re (64 L.J.
Q.B. 391), 20, 43, v.

Foster v. L.C. & D.R. (L.R. [1895]
1 Q.B. 711), 20, 52. iv.

v. Mayor of Sheffield, 96, ii.

Fox v. Martin, 100, i.
Freme v. Hall, 123, ii.
Freme's Contract, re, 124, v.

GENERAL ASSURANCE Co. v. WORSLEY
(72 L.T. 358), 20, 76, iii.
Gerard (Lord) & L. & N.W.R., re
(64 L.J. Q.B. 260), 20, 85, iii.
Gibson, e. p.; re Low (L.R. [1895]
1 Q.B. 734; 64 L.J. Q.B. 362;
72 L.T. 450), 20, 65, iii.
Gill v. Edouin, 112, vi.
Gipsy Queen, the (L.R. [1895] P. 176 ;
72 L.T. 454), 20, 90, iii.
Gloucester Bank v. Rudry Merthyr
Colliery Co., 112, iv.

Gosling v. Newton, 123, iv.

Grant v. Thompson (43 W.R. 446),
20, 78, vi.

G.N.R. v. Palmer (L.R. [1895]
1 Q B. 862; 64 L.J. Q.B. 306),
20, 85, i.

Grehan, re, 110, vii.
Griffiths v. Morris (L.R. [1895] 1Q.B.

866; 64 L.J. Q.B. 386), 20, 75, v.
Groom v. Cheesewright, 119, vi.
Gwilliam v. Twist, 111, V.
Gwynne v. Drewitt (43 W.R. 551),
20, 25, vii.

HADLEY V. BEEDOM (72 L.T. 493), 20,
66, iv.

Halestrap v. Gregory (64 L.J. Q.B.

415; 43 W.R. 507), 20, 80, v.
Hamelin v. Bannerman (L.R. [1895]
A.C. 237), 20, 87, iii.

Hanfstaengl v. American Tobacco
Co. (64 L.J. Q.B. 277), 20, 70, iii.
Hasluck, e. p.; re North, 96, v.
Henderson v. Williams (64 L.J.
Q.B. 308), 20, 72, iii.
Hestia, the, 119, ii.

Hill v. Hair, 110, v.
Hodgkinson v. H., 122, ii.

Holywell Assessment Committee v.
Halkyn Drainage Co. (L.R. [1895]
A.C. 117; 64 L.J. M.C. 113), 20,
82, iii.

[blocks in formation]

Katy, the (64 L.J. P. 49), 20, 55, v.
Kelly v. Metropolitan Railway Co.,
114, iv.

Kent County Council v. Humphrey,
123, v.

and Sandgate Local Board, re,
109, iv.
Knight v. K. (43 W.R. 472), 20, 67, ii.
Knox's Trusts, re (64 L.J. Ch. 402;

72 L.T. 416; 43 W.R. 442), 20,
84, ii.

Kops v. Reg. (64 L.J. P.C. 34), 20, 9, i.

LAMBTON V. KERR, 117, v.

Lavy v. London County Council,
112, i.

Le Bas v. Grant, 115, ii.
Lewis, e. p.; re Bassett, 115, vi.
Logan, e. p.; re Smith, 98, v.
London and General Bank, re, 102, iii.
Metallurgical Co., re, 102, i.
Lord of the Isles, the (64 L.J. P. 15),
20, 23, iv.

Lumley v. Ravenscroft, 120, i.

MCANDREW V. NORRIS, 103, i.
McDermott, e. p.; re Boyd (72 L.T.
348; 64 L.J. Q.B. 439), 20, 65, ii.
M'Hay v. Universal Stock Ex-
change, 114, iii.

Manchester (Mayor of) v. McAdam,
117, iv.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Marwick v. Lord Thurlow, 101, ii.
Meredyth v. M. (64 L.J. P. 64.), 20,
74, vi.

Mersey Ry. Co., re, 117, i.
Metcalfe v. Cox, 118, i.
Midgley v. Crowther, 120, v.
M.R. v. Gribble, 117, ii.

v. Silvester (64 L.J. Ch. 390;
43 W.R. 443), 20, 84, v.

Mills, e. p.; re Walker, 97, iii.
Morgan v. Jackson, 105, i.

Morley v. Rennoldson (72 L.T. 308),
20, 93, iii.

[ocr errors][merged small]

124, iii.
Morocco Bound" Syndicate v.
Harris (64 L.J. Ch. 400; 72 L.T.
415), 20, 70, i.

Mortgage Insurance Co. v. Pound,

116, iii.

Mowbray v. Merryweather, 104, i.

NAPPER V. FANSHAWE, 105, v.
Nautik, the (64 L.J. P. 61), 20, 90, i.
Nevill v. Fine Art Publishing Co.,
108, iii.

New Oriental Bank, re; e. p. Hong
Kong Land Co., 102, ii.
Newman & Co., re, 100, v.
Newton v. Debenture-Holders of
Anglo Australian Land

[ocr errors]

Co.

(L.R. [1895] A.C. 244; 64 L.J.P.C.
57; 72 L.T. 305), 20, 68, iii.
Nicholson v. Harper, 117, vii.
Norris v. Birch (72 L.T. 491), 20,
80, ii.

v. Craig, 108, ii.
North Western Bank v. Poynter
(64 L.J. P.C. 27), 20, 87, vi.
North Metropolitan Tramway Co. v.
L.C.C., 121, v.

OFFICIAL RECEIVER, e. p.; re FOSTER,
97, ii.

e. p.; re Thurlow
(L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 724), 20, 64, v.
e. p.; re Wells, 97,
vii.
Omnium Investment Co., re, 101, iv.
Onslow v. M.S. & L.R. (64 L.J. Ch.
355), 20, 85, ii.

O'Neil v. Armstrong, 119, iv.
O'Sullivan v. Thomas (L.R. [1895]
1 Q.B. 698; 64 L.J. Q.B. 398), 20,
73, iii.

[blocks in formation]

PARKINSON V. WAINWRIGHT, 100, ii.
Payne v. Wilson (64 L.J. Q.B. 328),
20, 87, iv.

Phythian v. Baxendale (L.R. [1895]

1 Q.B. 768; 64 L.J. M.C. 174; 72
L.T. 465), 20, 74, i.

Pilbrow v. Shoreditch Vestry (64
L.J. M.C. 130), 20, 80, i.
Plumstead Burial Ground, re, 104, iii.
Potter v. Peters, 120, ii.
Pyle v. P., 103, ii.

RABBETH V. DONALDSON (64 L.J. Ch.
465), 20, 71, i.

Reddaway v. Banham (64 L.J. Q.B.
321), 20, 91, iii.

Redgrave v. Lloyds, 111, i.

Reg. v. Baker, 103, vi.

v. Barnstaple Commissioners,
121, i.

v. Durham Justices, 107, v.
v. Field, 95, ii.

v. Fulwood Local Board, 109, v.
v. Huggins (64 L.J. M.C. 149),
20, 75, iv.

v. London Justices, 108, v.

[blocks in formation]

v. Marylebone Vestry (L.R.
[1895] 1 Q.B. 771), 20, 71, vii.
v. Mead, 110, iii.

v. Mills, 110, ii.

v. Munslow, 103, v.

v. Samuel, 120, vi.

v. Slade, 107, iii.

v. Titterton, 95, iii.

V. Tomlinson (L.R. [1895]
1 Q.B. 706; 43 W.R. 544), 20,
71, iii.

v. West Riding County Council,
109, iii.

v. West Riding Justices, 107, iv.
Robb v. Green, 111, iv.

Roberts v. Plant (64 L.J. Q.B. 347),
20, 84, iii.

Robins v. Gray, 107, i.
Robson v. Smith, 100, iii.

Roddick v. Indemnity Mutual Marine
Insurance Co, 118, viii.
Royle v. Harris (L.R. [1895] P. 163;
72 L.T. 474), 20, 94, iii.

ST. GEORGE'S LOCAL BOARD V. BALLARD
(L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 702; 72 L.T.
345), 20, 77, iv.

St. John Pendlebury (Vicar of) v.
Parishioners, 104, iv.

St. Thomas Floating Dock Co., re
(L.R. [1895] 1 Ch. 691; 64 L.J.
Ch. 361), 20, 68, iv.

San Paulo Railway Co. v. Carter
(64 L.J. Q.B. 379), 20, 86, v.
Satanita, the, 118, v.

Saunders, e. p.; re S., 97, v.
Sawyer v. Goddard (64 L.J. Ch. 341),
20, 91, iv.

[blocks in formation]

v. Baring, 107, vi.

Sculcoates Union v. Hull Docks
Co. (L.R. [1895] A.C. 136), 20,
48, vii.

Seaton v. Deerhurst, 98, iii.

Self v. Hove Commissioners (L.R.
[1895] 1 Q.B. 685), 20, 78, ii.
Semet and Solway, re (64 L.J. P.C.
41), 20, 48, v.

Shackell v. Chorlton (64 L.J. Ch. 353),
20, 69, iii.

Shenton v. Smith (L.R. [1895] A.C.
229), 20, 71. v.

Sherras v. De Rutzen, 108, vi.
Shoreditch Vestry v. L.C.C., 114, i.
Singleton v. Ellison (64 L.J. M.C.
123; 43 W.R. 426), 20, 71, ii.
Smith v. Molson's Bank, 96, iv.
v. Wallace (43 W.R. 539), 20,
91, vi.

Solicitor, a, re, 119, vii.

Stafford v. Dyer, 119, iii.

Stevens v. Green, 122, iii.

Steward v. England, 109, ii.

Stockton Football Club v. Gaston

(72 L.T. 490), 20, 82, iv.

Strachan, re (64 L.J. Ch. 321), 20,
78, v.

Strapp v. Bull, 101, iii.

Strathgarry, the (L.R. [1895] P. 264;
64 L.J. P. 59), 20, 90, iv.
Studham v. Stanbridge, 103, iv.

TARN V. EMMERSON (L.R. [1895]1 Ch.
652; 64 L.J. Ch. 468; 72 L.T. 406),
20, 63, ii.

Taunton v. Sheriff of Warwickshire,
100, iv.

Taylor v. Gates, 115, i.

Theatrical Trust, re, 101, vi.
Timmis v. Albiston, 117, iii.
Townsend's Contract, re (L.R. [1895]

1 Ch. 716; 64 L.J. Ch. 334; 72
L.T. 321), 20, 92, i.

[blocks in formation]

Wharton v. Masterman, 124, i.
White v. Mellin (L.R. [1895] A.C.
154 ; 72 L.T. 334), 20, 76, vi.
Wilkins, e. p., 103, vii.

Williams v. W. (64 L.J. Ch. 349;
72 L.T. 324), 20, 92, vi.
Wilmer v. McNamara, 101, i.
Winestead, the (L.R. [1895] P. 170;
64 L.J. P. 51), 20, 88, v.
Wirral Highway Board v. Newell
(L.R. [1895] I Q.B. 827; 72 L.T.
535; 64 L.J. M.Č. 181), 20, 73, vi.
Wolverhampton (Mayor) v. Salop
County Council, 105, vi.

Woodroffe v. Moody (43 W.R. 462),
20, 31, ii.

Wylie v. Moffat, 111, iii.

YEADON WATERWORKS Co. v. BINNS, re,
102, vi.

Yorkshire Life Assurance Co. v.
Gilbert, 115, iii.

Young v. Holloway (64 L.J. P. 55;
43 W.R. 429), 20, 94, iv.

ZELMA GOLD MINING Co. v. HOSKINS
(64 L.J. P.C. 45), 20, 67, vi.

« 이전계속 »