C. H. LOMAX, M.A., OF THE INNER TEMPLE, BARRISTER-AT-LAW.
of the cases reported during May, June, and July, 1895.
Where a case has already been given in the Digest for a preceding quarter, the additional report is given after the name of the case, with a reference to the volume of the Digest in which it first appeared, the thick number being the number of the volume.
Aitken v. McMeckan, 125, i. Alexandre v. Brassard, 99, iv. Alliott v. Smith, 114, vi.
Allport v. Securities Co., 106, v. Anderson v. A. (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 749; 64 L.J. Q.B. 457; 72 L.T. 313), 20, 71, vi.
Andrews v. Nott-Bower, 108, iv. Atlantic and North-Western Rail- way Co. v. Wood (L.R. [1895] A.C. 257), 20, 67, iv. Attenborough v. Henschel (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 833), 20, 70, vii. A.-G. v. Jacobs Smith (64 L.J. Q.B. 270), 20, 54, i.
v. Lloyd (64 L.J. Q.B. 365), 20, 86, vi.
v. North Metropolitan Tram- ways Co., 114, v.
BAKER V. STONE, 124, iv.
Bank of S. Australia, re, 102, iv. Bankruptcy Notice, re, 97, i. Barnett v. Hickmott ((L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 690; 64 L.J. Q.B. 407), 20, 86, ii.
Barry, &c., Local Board v. Parry, 110, vi.
Bartlett v. Ford's Hotel Co., 96, iii. Bates v. Plumstead Overseers, 112, iii. Baynes v. Lloyd, 108, i.
Baxter v. France (64 L.J. Q.B. 335), 20, 83, ix.
Baxter v. France (64 L.J. Q.B. 337), 20, 83, x.
Beauclerk v. B., 106, iv. Beaver v. Master in Equity (L.R. [1895] A.C. 251), 20, 86, vii. Bird v. St. Mary Abbott's Vestry, 110, i.
Bishop v. Smyrna Railway Co., 102, v.
Black v. Dawson, 116, i. v. Williams, 119, i. Blue Bell, the, 118, iii. Board of Trade, e. p.; re Hedley, 98, ii.
v. Provident Clerks Guarantee Association, 98, iv. Bolton v. Curre, 121, vi. Bona, the (64 L.J. P. 62), 20, 89, iii. Bonhote v. Henderson, 118, ii. Booth v. Arnold (64 L.J. Q.B. 443; 72 L.T. 310), 20, 90, vi. Botten v. City and Suburban Build- ing Society, 99, i.
Bower v. Goodman, 124, vi. v. Hett, 96, vi.
Bowling & Welby, re, 101, v. Brocklesby v. Temperance, Building Society, 116, ii. Brophy v. A.-G. for Manitoba (L.R. [1895] A.C. 202), 20, 67, v. Brothwood v. Keeling, 95, i.
Brown, Janson & Co. v. Hutchinson, 113, ii., iii.
Bryant, e. p.; re B. (64 L.J. Q.B. 417), 20, 66, ii.
Burdekin, re, 119, v. Burlington, the, 118, vi.
Bury v. Thompson (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 696; 64 L.J. Q.B. 257), 20, 76, i.
CALHAM V. SMITH (64 L.J. Ch. 325), 20, 93, vi.
Canterbury (Mayor of) v. Wyburn (64 L.J. P.C. 36; 43 W.R. 430), 20, 67, iii.
Cartwright v. Regan, 98, vii. Casgrain v. Atlantic and North- Western Railway, 99, iii. Chartered Bank of India, &c. v. Macfadyen (64 L.J. Q.B. 367; 72 L.T. 428), 20, 64, iii.
Chichester v. Quatrefages, 124, vii. Chilton v. Progress Printing, &c., Co., 103, iii.
Chipperfield v. Carter, 120, iii. Clacton Local Board v. Young (64
L.J. M.C. 124), 20, 77, v. Clayton v. Barclay, 123, iii. Combridge v. Harrison, 104, v. Cook's Mortgage, re, 122, v. Cooke, goods of (43 W.R. 428), 20, 64, i.
Cooper v. Stephens (64 L.J. Ch. 403;
72 L.T. 390; 43 W.R. 444) 20, 70, v. County Estates Co. V. Graves (64 L.J. P.C. 44) 20, 68, ii. Cunnack v. Edwards (64 L.J. Ch. 344; 72 L.T. 386), 20, 73, ii.
DEARBERG V. LATCHFORD, 104, ii. Deeley's Patent, re, 113, iv. Densham's Trade Mark, re, 121, iii. Derby, Mayor of, v. Grudgings (72 L.T. 594), 20, 13, iii. Dickson v. Law, 115, vii.
Dodds v. South Shields Assessment Committee, 113, v.
Dolcini v. D., 98, vi.
Downes v. Johnson, 105, ii. Dyer v. Munday, 111, vi.
Fairtlough v. Whitmore, 105, iv. Farmer v. Waterloo and City Rail- way Company (64 L.J. Ch. 338), 20, 85, v.
Flood v. Jackson, 111, vii. Forget v. Ostigny, 105, iii. Formby and Holmes, re (64 L.J. Q.B. 391), 20, 43, v.
Foster v. L.C. & D.R. (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 711), 20, 52. iv.
v. Mayor of Sheffield, 96, ii.
Fox v. Martin, 100, i. Freme v. Hall, 123, ii. Freme's Contract, re, 124, v.
GENERAL ASSURANCE Co. v. WORSLEY (72 L.T. 358), 20, 76, iii. Gerard (Lord) & L. & N.W.R., re (64 L.J. Q.B. 260), 20, 85, iii. Gibson, e. p.; re Low (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 734; 64 L.J. Q.B. 362; 72 L.T. 450), 20, 65, iii. Gill v. Edouin, 112, vi. Gipsy Queen, the (L.R. [1895] P. 176 ; 72 L.T. 454), 20, 90, iii. Gloucester Bank v. Rudry Merthyr Colliery Co., 112, iv.
Gosling v. Newton, 123, iv.
Grant v. Thompson (43 W.R. 446), 20, 78, vi.
G.N.R. v. Palmer (L.R. [1895] 1 Q B. 862; 64 L.J. Q.B. 306), 20, 85, i.
Grehan, re, 110, vii. Griffiths v. Morris (L.R. [1895] 1Q.B.
866; 64 L.J. Q.B. 386), 20, 75, v. Groom v. Cheesewright, 119, vi. Gwilliam v. Twist, 111, V. Gwynne v. Drewitt (43 W.R. 551), 20, 25, vii.
HADLEY V. BEEDOM (72 L.T. 493), 20, 66, iv.
Halestrap v. Gregory (64 L.J. Q.B.
415; 43 W.R. 507), 20, 80, v. Hamelin v. Bannerman (L.R. [1895] A.C. 237), 20, 87, iii.
Hanfstaengl v. American Tobacco Co. (64 L.J. Q.B. 277), 20, 70, iii. Hasluck, e. p.; re North, 96, v. Henderson v. Williams (64 L.J. Q.B. 308), 20, 72, iii. Hestia, the, 119, ii.
Hill v. Hair, 110, v. Hodgkinson v. H., 122, ii.
Holywell Assessment Committee v. Halkyn Drainage Co. (L.R. [1895] A.C. 117; 64 L.J. M.C. 113), 20, 82, iii.
Katy, the (64 L.J. P. 49), 20, 55, v. Kelly v. Metropolitan Railway Co., 114, iv.
Kent County Council v. Humphrey, 123, v.
and Sandgate Local Board, re, 109, iv. Knight v. K. (43 W.R. 472), 20, 67, ii. Knox's Trusts, re (64 L.J. Ch. 402;
72 L.T. 416; 43 W.R. 442), 20, 84, ii.
Kops v. Reg. (64 L.J. P.C. 34), 20, 9, i.
LAMBTON V. KERR, 117, v.
Lavy v. London County Council, 112, i.
Le Bas v. Grant, 115, ii. Lewis, e. p.; re Bassett, 115, vi. Logan, e. p.; re Smith, 98, v. London and General Bank, re, 102, iii. Metallurgical Co., re, 102, i. Lord of the Isles, the (64 L.J. P. 15), 20, 23, iv.
Lumley v. Ravenscroft, 120, i.
MCANDREW V. NORRIS, 103, i. McDermott, e. p.; re Boyd (72 L.T. 348; 64 L.J. Q.B. 439), 20, 65, ii. M'Hay v. Universal Stock Ex- change, 114, iii.
Manchester (Mayor of) v. McAdam, 117, iv.
Marwick v. Lord Thurlow, 101, ii. Meredyth v. M. (64 L.J. P. 64.), 20, 74, vi.
Mersey Ry. Co., re, 117, i. Metcalfe v. Cox, 118, i. Midgley v. Crowther, 120, v. M.R. v. Gribble, 117, ii.
v. Silvester (64 L.J. Ch. 390; 43 W.R. 443), 20, 84, v.
Mills, e. p.; re Walker, 97, iii. Morgan v. Jackson, 105, i.
Morley v. Rennoldson (72 L.T. 308), 20, 93, iii.
124, iii. Morocco Bound" Syndicate v. Harris (64 L.J. Ch. 400; 72 L.T. 415), 20, 70, i.
Mortgage Insurance Co. v. Pound,
Mowbray v. Merryweather, 104, i.
NAPPER V. FANSHAWE, 105, v. Nautik, the (64 L.J. P. 61), 20, 90, i. Nevill v. Fine Art Publishing Co., 108, iii.
New Oriental Bank, re; e. p. Hong Kong Land Co., 102, ii. Newman & Co., re, 100, v. Newton v. Debenture-Holders of Anglo Australian Land
(L.R. [1895] A.C. 244; 64 L.J.P.C. 57; 72 L.T. 305), 20, 68, iii. Nicholson v. Harper, 117, vii. Norris v. Birch (72 L.T. 491), 20, 80, ii.
v. Craig, 108, ii. North Western Bank v. Poynter (64 L.J. P.C. 27), 20, 87, vi. North Metropolitan Tramway Co. v. L.C.C., 121, v.
OFFICIAL RECEIVER, e. p.; re FOSTER, 97, ii.
e. p.; re Thurlow (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 724), 20, 64, v. e. p.; re Wells, 97, vii. Omnium Investment Co., re, 101, iv. Onslow v. M.S. & L.R. (64 L.J. Ch. 355), 20, 85, ii.
O'Neil v. Armstrong, 119, iv. O'Sullivan v. Thomas (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 698; 64 L.J. Q.B. 398), 20, 73, iii.
PARKINSON V. WAINWRIGHT, 100, ii. Payne v. Wilson (64 L.J. Q.B. 328), 20, 87, iv.
Phythian v. Baxendale (L.R. [1895]
1 Q.B. 768; 64 L.J. M.C. 174; 72 L.T. 465), 20, 74, i.
Pilbrow v. Shoreditch Vestry (64 L.J. M.C. 130), 20, 80, i. Plumstead Burial Ground, re, 104, iii. Potter v. Peters, 120, ii. Pyle v. P., 103, ii.
RABBETH V. DONALDSON (64 L.J. Ch. 465), 20, 71, i.
Reddaway v. Banham (64 L.J. Q.B. 321), 20, 91, iii.
Redgrave v. Lloyds, 111, i.
Reg. v. Baker, 103, vi.
v. Barnstaple Commissioners, 121, i.
v. Durham Justices, 107, v. v. Field, 95, ii.
v. Fulwood Local Board, 109, v. v. Huggins (64 L.J. M.C. 149), 20, 75, iv.
v. London Justices, 108, v.
v. Marylebone Vestry (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 771), 20, 71, vii. v. Mead, 110, iii.
v. Mills, 110, ii.
v. Munslow, 103, v.
v. Samuel, 120, vi.
v. Slade, 107, iii.
v. Titterton, 95, iii.
V. Tomlinson (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 706; 43 W.R. 544), 20, 71, iii.
v. West Riding County Council, 109, iii.
v. West Riding Justices, 107, iv. Robb v. Green, 111, iv.
Roberts v. Plant (64 L.J. Q.B. 347), 20, 84, iii.
Robins v. Gray, 107, i. Robson v. Smith, 100, iii.
Roddick v. Indemnity Mutual Marine Insurance Co, 118, viii. Royle v. Harris (L.R. [1895] P. 163; 72 L.T. 474), 20, 94, iii.
ST. GEORGE'S LOCAL BOARD V. BALLARD (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 702; 72 L.T. 345), 20, 77, iv.
St. John Pendlebury (Vicar of) v. Parishioners, 104, iv.
St. Thomas Floating Dock Co., re (L.R. [1895] 1 Ch. 691; 64 L.J. Ch. 361), 20, 68, iv.
San Paulo Railway Co. v. Carter (64 L.J. Q.B. 379), 20, 86, v. Satanita, the, 118, v.
Saunders, e. p.; re S., 97, v. Sawyer v. Goddard (64 L.J. Ch. 341), 20, 91, iv.
Sculcoates Union v. Hull Docks Co. (L.R. [1895] A.C. 136), 20, 48, vii.
Seaton v. Deerhurst, 98, iii.
Self v. Hove Commissioners (L.R. [1895] 1 Q.B. 685), 20, 78, ii. Semet and Solway, re (64 L.J. P.C. 41), 20, 48, v.
Shackell v. Chorlton (64 L.J. Ch. 353), 20, 69, iii.
Shenton v. Smith (L.R. [1895] A.C. 229), 20, 71. v.
Sherras v. De Rutzen, 108, vi. Shoreditch Vestry v. L.C.C., 114, i. Singleton v. Ellison (64 L.J. M.C. 123; 43 W.R. 426), 20, 71, ii. Smith v. Molson's Bank, 96, iv. v. Wallace (43 W.R. 539), 20, 91, vi.
Solicitor, a, re, 119, vii.
Stafford v. Dyer, 119, iii.
Stevens v. Green, 122, iii.
Steward v. England, 109, ii.
Stockton Football Club v. Gaston
(72 L.T. 490), 20, 82, iv.
Strachan, re (64 L.J. Ch. 321), 20, 78, v.
Strapp v. Bull, 101, iii.
Strathgarry, the (L.R. [1895] P. 264; 64 L.J. P. 59), 20, 90, iv. Studham v. Stanbridge, 103, iv.
TARN V. EMMERSON (L.R. [1895]1 Ch. 652; 64 L.J. Ch. 468; 72 L.T. 406), 20, 63, ii.
Taunton v. Sheriff of Warwickshire, 100, iv.
Taylor v. Gates, 115, i.
Theatrical Trust, re, 101, vi. Timmis v. Albiston, 117, iii. Townsend's Contract, re (L.R. [1895]
1 Ch. 716; 64 L.J. Ch. 334; 72 L.T. 321), 20, 92, i.
Wharton v. Masterman, 124, i. White v. Mellin (L.R. [1895] A.C. 154 ; 72 L.T. 334), 20, 76, vi. Wilkins, e. p., 103, vii.
Williams v. W. (64 L.J. Ch. 349; 72 L.T. 324), 20, 92, vi. Wilmer v. McNamara, 101, i. Winestead, the (L.R. [1895] P. 170; 64 L.J. P. 51), 20, 88, v. Wirral Highway Board v. Newell (L.R. [1895] I Q.B. 827; 72 L.T. 535; 64 L.J. M.Č. 181), 20, 73, vi. Wolverhampton (Mayor) v. Salop County Council, 105, vi.
Woodroffe v. Moody (43 W.R. 462), 20, 31, ii.
Wylie v. Moffat, 111, iii.
YEADON WATERWORKS Co. v. BINNS, re, 102, vi.
Yorkshire Life Assurance Co. v. Gilbert, 115, iii.
Young v. Holloway (64 L.J. P. 55; 43 W.R. 429), 20, 94, iv.
ZELMA GOLD MINING Co. v. HOSKINS (64 L.J. P.C. 45), 20, 67, vi.
« 이전계속 » |