Readings in ArgumentationWalter de Gruyter, 1992 - 813페이지 In this volume, emphasis is placed on contributions to the study of argumentation by scholars from communication, speech communication, rhetoric, and discourse analysis. So far, their work has been insufficiently represented in anthologies, overviews and readers. William Benoit, Dale Hample, and Pamela Benoit have made efforts to correct the imbalance by filling in the gap. In our opinion, they have succeeded in compounding an excellent selection of classical highlights from modern literature in the field. For scholars, the books provides a rich source of information and references. -- Pref. (p. [xi]-xii). |
목차
The Contemporary Renaissance | 33 |
Traditional Conceptions of Argument | 49 |
Introduction | 69 |
A Third Perspective on Argument | 91 |
Introduction | 117 |
Introduction | 161 |
Generic Characteristics | 185 |
Everyday Argumentation from | 205 |
Persistent Questions in the Theory | 417 |
A Cartesian Meditation | 437 |
Argument Fields | 469 |
Individual and Social Viewpoints on Argument | 507 |
A Quest for Distinctions | 523 |
The Role of Argumentation in Source Credibility | 537 |
Pragmatics of Argument | 565 |
Response of Frans H van Eemeren | 571 |
Form in Argument | 221 |
On the Utility of Descriptive Diagrams | 239 |
Dramatism and Argument | 279 |
Evaluating Arguments | 293 |
What is a Good Argument? | 313 |
In Defense of the Fallacy | 337 |
Everyday Argumentation | 357 |
Argument and Values | 379 |
Toward a Rationale for a ValueCentered Argument | 399 |
Response of Rob Grootendorst | 579 |
Argumentation Studies Five Estates | 615 |
Everyday Argumentation from | 655 |
Argument in Everyday Contexts | 707 |
Argument in Satisfied and Dissatisfied | 737 |
A Critical Summary of Research on the Role | 765 |
Conclusion | 785 |
List of Contributors and Sources | 793 |
기타 출판본 - 모두 보기
자주 나오는 단어 및 구문
acceptance American Forensic Association analysis arguers arguing argument fields argument forms argumentation theory Aristotle audience behavior believe Benoit Brockriede Chaim Perelman characteristics of argument Charles Arthur Willard claim cognitive concept of argument Conference on Argumentation context conversational Criticism of Arguments Dale Hample defined diagram dialectical disagreement discourse discussion dispute dissatisfied couples Eemeren and Grootendorst Ehninger enthymeme essay Estate ethics evaluation everyday argumentation example fallacies formal function gument Hample illocutionary act complex illocutionary force individual informal logic interaction interpersonal interpretive Jackson Jacobs Journal of Speech language means normative O'Keefe particular Perelman perlocution perlocutionary act person persuasive philosophical premises problem produce propositions purpose question rational reason relevant rhetorical rules scholars sense situation social actors speaker specific Speech Act Perspective Speech Communication standards statements Stephen Toulmin study of argumentation syllogism theoretical theorists Toulmin Toulmin model type theory utterance validity warrant Willard