 | United States. Supreme Court - 1912 - 840 페이지
...Harlan, speaking for this court in Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 168 US 1,48: "That a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue and directly...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies." Sound reason, as we think, constrains us to deny to a certificate of naturalization, procured ex parte... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1939 - 836 페이지
...this Court (at pp. 48-49) said: The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue and directly...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and even if the second suit is for a different cause of action, the right, question, or fact once so... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1964 - 972 페이지
...United States, 168 US 1, as follows: The general principle announced in numerous cases Is that a right, question or fact distinctly put In issue and directly...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and even if the second suit is for a different cause of action, the right, question or fact once so... | |
 | 1920 - 496 페이지
...Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dlst. v. Superior Court of Tulare County, Cal., 187 Pac. 1056. 54. Res Judicata. — A fact distinctly put In issue and directly determined...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties, even if the second suit is for a different cause of action. — Lyons v. Empire Fuel Co., MSCCA, 262... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1912 - 666 페이지
...on Engineering and Architectural Jurisprudence, p. 281 ; Brown v. Foster, 113 Mass. 136.) A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue and directly...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies ; and even if the second suit is for a different cause of action, the right, question, or fact, once... | |
 | 1900 - 2044 페이지
...18 Snp. Ct. 27, it is said that: "The general principle announced In numerous eases Is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue, and directly...ground of recovery, cannot be disputed In a subsequent salt between the same parties or their privies: and, even if the second suit le for a different cause... | |
 | 1917 - 2042 페이지
...the adjudications in both extend, rrom this has arisen the rule of the Supreme Court that: "A right, question or fact, distinctly put In issue and directly...competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot tie disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies ; and even if the second... | |
 | 1901 - 958 페이지
...Sup. Ct. Hep. 18, 27, we said, after an extended examination of the adjudged cases, that "a right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue and directly...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and even if the second suit is for a different cause of action, the right, question, or fact once so... | |
 | 1899 - 986 페이지
...which this salutary rule rests. The general principle announced In numerous cases Is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put In Issue, and directly...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and, even If the second suit Is for a different § cause of action, the right, question, or fact'once... | |
 | 1902 - 988 페이지
...ed. p. 376, Sup. Ct. Rep. p. 27: "The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, preem@ and even if the second suit is for a different cause of action, the right, question, or fact once so... | |
| |
... right, question or fact once so determined must, as between the same parties or their privies, be taken as conclusively established, so long as the judgment in the first suit remains unmodified. 
