Chapter sible minis houses. Such being the direct and formal communications between XVIII. the Crown and Parliament, it may be added that the presence ters in of ministers, in both houses, maintains the closest relations both of the Crown with the legislature. The representation of every department of the state by members of Parliament, and the principles of ministerial responsibility, long since established in our constitution, bring the executive government and the legislature into uninterrupted intercourse and combined action. Where no formal communication between the Crown and Parliament is technically required, the introduction of a measure by his Majesty's ministers, attests the royal approval; and when amendments are made, by either house, which ministers accept instead of abandoning the measure, or resigning office, they are under an obligation to advise the King to signify his royal assent to the bill, when it has been agreed to by both houses. Again, when the measures or policy of ministers are condemned by Parliament, a change of administration restores agreement between the executive and the legislature. Ministers are responsible alike to the Crown and to Parliament, and so long as they are able to retain the confidence of both, the harmonious action of the several estates of the realm is secured.1 1 For further illustrations of the constitutional relations of ministers with Parliament, see 4 Macaulay, Hist. 430, et seq.; May, Const. Hist. chap. 7; 2 Todd, Parl. Government, (new edition, 1892) 25, et seq.; Bage hot on the English Constitution; General nature of a bill. Ancient mode of enacting laws. CHAPTER XIX. PROCEEDINGS OF PARLIAMENT IN PASSING PUBLIC BILLS. Chapter XIX. Table of Contents, see Intro Ir bills were not a more convenient form of legislation, duction. 1 Rot Parl. passim. 23 ib. 256 (13th Richard II.); ib. 368 (21st Richard II.); stat. 21st Richard II. c. 16. 3 Rot. Parl. 102 (5th Richard II. No. 23); 3 ib. 141 (6th Richard II. No. 30); 3 ib. 418 (1st Henry IV.); XIX. 1 Chapter should be bound without their assent; saving always to our liege lord his real prerogative to grant and deny what him lust, of their petitions and askings aforesaid." 1 No distinct consequences appear to have immediately followed this remarkable petition; and, so long as laws were enacted in the form of petitions, to any portion of which the king might give or withhold his assent, and attach conditions or qualifications of his own, the assent of the entire Parliament was rather constructive than literal; and the Statute Rolls, however impartially drawn up, were imperfect records of the legislative determinations of Parliament. For the modern system. But petitions from the Commons, which were originally Origin of the foundation of all laws, were ultimately superseded; and in the reign of Henry VI. bills began to be introduced, in either house, in the form of complete statutes, which were passed in a manner approaching that of modern times, and received the distinct assent of the king, in the form in which they had been agreed to by both houses of Parliament. It is true that Henry VI. and Edward IV. occasionally added new provisions to statutes, without consulting Parliament; 2 but the constitutional form of legislating by bill and statute, agreed to in Parliament, undoubtedly had its origin and its sanction in the reign of Henry VI. Before the present method of passing bills in Parliament Similarity of practices is entered upon, it may be premised that the practice of in both the Lords and Commons is so similar in regard to the several houses. stages of bills, and the proceedings connected with them, that, except where variations are distinctly pointed out, a statement of the proceedings of one house is equally descriptive of the proceedings of the other. As a general rule, bills may originate in either house: Where practice re- but the exclusive right of the House of Commons to grant originate. garding and charges upon the the Lords, supplies, and to impose and appropriate all charges upon the people, renders it necessary to introduce by far the greater proportion of bills into that house. people, see p. 574. 14 Rot. Parl. 22, No. 10. * Ruffhead's Statutes, Preface; Cotton's Abridgment, Preface. bills Restitution bills. ΧΙΧ. A bill which concerns the privileges or proceedings of Chapter either house, should, in courtesy, commence in that house to which it relates. But bills affecting privileges of the other house have, nevertheless, been admitted without objection. Amendments, however, concerning the privileges and jurisdiction of the Lords, have given rise to discussions in both houses.3 The Lords claim that bills for the restitution of honours and in blood should commence with them; and such bills are presented to that house by his Majesty's command.* The customary practice adopted by the House of Commons in dealing with a restitution bill, is, on the receipt of the bill from the Lords, to read the bill a first and second time, and to commit the bill to a select committee, nominated forthwith, without previous notice of the names of the committee, the King's consent having been signified before the first reading. On the report of the bill from the select committee, the bill is appointed for third reading upon a Attainder future day. Bills of attainder, and of pains and penalties, generally originate in the House of Lords, being of a judicial character. bills. 5 13 Hatsell, 69; 2 Stephen's Blackstone, 372. 2 Votes by Proxy Abolition Bill, 1832; 11 H. D. 3 s. 1156; Election of Scotch Representative Peers Bill, 1869, 194 ib. 988; Members' Seats Vacating Bill (Lords), 8th June, 1832, 64 L. J. 286. Lord Radnor thought the other house "might take a technical objection to the measure, on the ground that it was one which ought not to have arisen in the House of Lords." Lord Northampton did not think "the subject was one with which their lordships had a right to interfere," 13 H. D. 3 s. 611. 1086. Bishops in Parliament Bills, 1834, 1836, and 1837. The Irish bishops were excluded from their seats in the House of Lords, in 1869, by a bill brought from the Commons. Lords' Spiritual Bill, 1870, 125 C. J. 269. See debate in the Lords on the • Maxwell's Restitution Bill, 1848; 3 Drummond's Restitution Bill. Earl of Mar's Restitution Bill, 1885, 140 ib. 374. 381. Chapter Bills passed with expedition, see p. 516. grace or A bill for a general pardon, or act of grace, as it is com- Act of monly termed, originates with the Crown, and is read once general only in each house, all the members being uncovered, after pardon. which it receives the royal assent in the ordinary form. Such a bill cannot be amended by either house of Parliament, but must be accepted in the form in which it is received from the Crown, or rejected.1 An act of indemnity, protecting persons against the consequences of any breach of the law, is proceeded with as an ordinary bill, though, being usually an urgent matter, the bill is passed through all its stages at one sitting.2 Bills are divided into the two classes, of public and private Public and private bills. The former, relating to matters of public policy, are bills. introduced directly by members of the house, while the latter are founded upon the petitions of parties interested. Procedure The greater part of these proceedings apply equally to both on private classes of bills: but the progress of private bills is governed by so many peculiar regulations and standing orders, in both houses, that an entire separation of the two classes can alone make the progress of either intelligible. bills, see p. 672. presented in the 4 Lords. In the House of Lords, any peer is at liberty to present Public bills a bill, and to have it laid upon the table, without notice." In the Commons, a member may either present a bill or Presented move for leave to bring in a bill, but in either case due or ordered notice must have been given. In making a motion for Commons. for leave leave to bring in a bill, he may explain the object of the Motions made at commence- bill, and give reasons for its introduction; but unless the 1 14 L. J. 502. 503 (1690); 25 C. J. 406 (1747); 4 Burnet's Own Time, 121; 3 Macaulay's Hist. 575. 2 Earl of Winchilsea's Indemnity Bill, 5th June, 1820, 75 C. J. 275. 276; Lord Harborough's Indemnity Bill, 21st Aug. 1820, 75 ib. 478; Earl of Scarborough's Indemnity Bill, 6th Sept. 1841; Forsyth's Indemnity Bill, 1866; Lord Byron's Indemnity Bill, 1880, 135 ib. 306; 254 H. D. 3 s. 646; 96 C. J. 542; 121 ib. 239; 135 ib. 371 (Lord Plunket), 1880; 254 H. D. 3 s. 646. 3 3 H. D. 24; 13 H. D. 3 s. 1188. By standing order, the name of the lord presenting a bill is printed in the minutes. Notices of the presentation of bills without an order of the house for their introduction are set down on the notice paper at the commencement of public business, immediately before the notices of motions that may be taken at that time. in the |