Chicago &c. Ry. Co. v. United States, 196 Fed. Rep. 882, approved in
Southern Ry. Co. v. Crockett, 725.

United States v. National Surety Co., 92 Fed. Rep. 549, approved in
Equitable Surety Co. v. McMillan, 448.

CASES DISTINGUISHED.

Atlantic Coast Line v. Riverside Mills, 219 U. S. 186, distinguished in
Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Harris, 412.

Harley v. United States, 198 U. S. 229, distinguished in United States v.
Buffalo Pitts Co., 228.

Hooe v. United States, 218 U. S. 322, distinguished in United States v.
Buffalo Pitts Co., 228.

United States v. McMullen, 222 U. S. 460, distinguished in United
States v. Axman, 36.

United States v. O'Brien, 220 U. S. 321, distinguished in Stone & Gravel
Co. v. United States, 370.

CASES FOLLOWED.

Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, 226 U. S. 491, followed in Seaboard

Air Line Ry, v. J. M. Pace Mule Co., 751.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Robinson, 233 U. S. 173, followed in
Pacific Express Co. v. Rudman, 752.

Atlantic Coast Line v. Mazursky, 216 U. S. 122, followed in Missouri,
K. & T. Ry. v. Harris, 412.

Atlantic Transport Co. v. Imbrovek, 234 U. S. 54, followed in Atlantic
Transport Co. v. Szczesek, 63.

Ballinger v. Frost, 216 U. S. 240, followed in Lane v. Watts, 525.
Bernheimer v. Converse, 206 U. S. 516, followed in Selig v. Hamilton,

652.

Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. S. 333, followed in Jones v. Jones, 615.
Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co., 228 U. S. 137, followed in Gallagher v.
Florida East Coast Ry. Co., 753.

Calnan Co. v. Doherty, 224 U. S. 145, followed in Synnott v. Tombstone
Cons. Mines Co., 749.

Chapman v. Bowen, 207 U. S. 89, followed in Synnott v. Tombstone Cons.

Mines Co., 749.

Chase v. United States, 155 U. S. 489, followed in United States v.

Buffalo Pitts Co., 228.

Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222, followed in Cincinnati
Northern Ry. Co. v. Dillon, 753.

Chicago &c. R. Co. v. Miller, 226 U. S. 513, followed in Seaboard Air

Line Ry. v. J. M. Pace Mule Co., 751.

Coder v. Arts, 213 U. S. 223, followed in Synnott v. Tombstone Cons.
Mines Co., 749.

Collins v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 634, followed in Malone v. Kentucky,
639.

Conboy v. First National Bank, 203 U. S. 141, followed in Synnott v.
Tombstone Cons. Mines Co., 749.

Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, followed

in Prenica v. Bulger, 750; Lewiston v. Chamberlain, 751.
Converse v. Hamilton, 224 U. S. 243, followed in Selig v. Hamilton, 652.
De Bary & Co. v. Louisiana, 227 U. S. 108, followed in Prenica v. Bul-
ger, 750.

Ex parte Harding, 219 U. S. 363, followed in Ex parte Roe, 70.

Fore River Shipbuilding Co. v. Hagg, 219 U. S. 175, followed in Gal-
lagher v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co., 753.

Gibson v. Stevens, 8 How. 384, followed in Dale v. Pattison, 399.
Gloucester Ferry Co. v. Pennsylvania, 114 U. S. 196, followed in Sault
Ste Marie v. International Transit Co., 333.

Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. Lindsay, 233 U. S. 42, followed in Cincinnati
Northern Ry. Co. v. Dillon, 753.

Grenada Lumber Co. v. Mississippi, 217 U. S. 433, followed in Eastern
States Lumber Asso. v. United States, 600.

Hazeltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130, followed in Northern Trust Co.
v. Illinois, 748.

Houston & Texas Cent. R. R. Co. v. Mayes, 201 U. S. 321, followed in
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Beatty, 753.

In re Chetwood, 165 U. S. 443, followed in Meeker v. Lehigh Valley R. R.
Co., 749.

In re Wood and Henderson, 210 U. S. 246, followed in Lazarus v. Pren-
tice, 263.

International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 216, followed in
Same v. Same, 589; Collins v. Kentucky, 634.

International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 579, followed in
Same v. Same, 589.

Intermountain Rate Cases, 234 U. S. 476, followed in United States v.
Union Pacific R. R. Co., 495.

Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245, followed in Craig v. Jarrett, 752.

Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589, followed in Lewiston v.
Chamberlain, 751.

Kansas Southern Ry. v. Carl, 227 U. S. 637, followed in Pacific Express

Co. v. Rudman, 752.

Kauffman v. Waters, 138 U. S. 285, followed in Missouri, K. & T. Ry.
Co. v. Goodrich, 754.

Los Angeles Switching Case, 234 U. S. 294, followed in Interstate Com.
Comm. v. Southern Pacific Co., 315.

Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Kentucky, 183 U. S. 503, followed in
Intermountain Rate Cases, 476.

Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, followed
in Northern Trust Co. v. Illinois, 748.

McClellan v. Garland, 217 U. S. 268, followed in Meeker v. Lehigh
Valley R. R. Co., 749.

McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, followed in Lewiston v. Chamber-
lain, 751.

Miedreich v. Lauenstein, 232 U. S. 236, followed in Louisville & Nash-
ville R. R. Co. v. Higdon, 592.

Missouri & K. Interurban Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S. 185, followed in
Northern Trust Co. v. Illinois, 748.

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Cade, 233 U. S. 642, followed in Missouri,
K. & T. Ry. v. Harris, 412.

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Goodrich, 229 U. S. 607, followed in Same
v. Same, 754.

Missouri &c. R. Co. v. Harriman Bros., 227 U. S. 657, followed in Sea-
board Air Line Ry. Co. v. J. M. Pace Mule Co., 751.

Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Kirchoff, 169 U. S. 103, followed in Louisville &
Nashville R. R. Co. v. Higdon, 592.

National Bank v. Insurance Co., 100 U. S. 43, followed in Lazarus v.
Prentice, 263.

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Head, 234 U. S. 149, followed in Same v.
Same, 166.

Noble v. Union River Logging Co., 147 U. S. 165, followed in Lane v.
Watts, 525.

North Carolina R. R. v. Zachary, 232 U. S. 248, followed in Carlson v.
Curtiss, 103.

Patterson v. Colorado, 205 U. S. 454, followed in Clinchfield Coal Cor-
poration v. Maness, 748.

Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714, followed in Grannis v. Ordean,
385.

Pons v. Yazoo & M. V. R. R. Co., 232 U. S. 720, followed in Northern

Trust Co. v. Illinois, 748.

Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, followed in Clinchfield Coal Corpora-
tion v. Maness, 748.

Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Friday, 232 U. S. 694, followed in Schmidt v. Bank

of Commerce, 64.

Southern Pacific Co. v. Schuyler, 227 U. S. 601, followed in Carlson v.
Curtiss, 103.

Southern Ry. Co. v. Bennett, 233 U. S. 80, followed in Cincinnati North-
ern Ry. Co. v. Dillon, 753.

Southern Ry. Co. v. Carson, 194 U. S. 136, followed in Cincinnati North-
ern Ry. Co. v. Dillon, 753.

Southern Ry. Co. v. Gadd, 233 U. S. 572, followed in Cincinnati Northern
Ry. Co. v. Dillon, 753.

Southern Ry. Co. v. Reid, 222 U. S. 424, followed in Missouri, K. & T.
Ry. v. Harris, 412.

Stoneroad v. Stoneroad, 158 U. S. 240, followed in Lane v. Watts, 525.
Sun Printing Asso. v. Moore, 183 U. S. 642, followed in United States v.

United Engineering Co., 236.

Taney v. Penn Bank, 232 U. S. 174, followed in Dale v. Pattison, 399.
Tap Line Cases, 234 U. S. 1, followed in United States v. Butler County
R. R. Co., 29.

Tefft, Weller & Co. v. Munsuri, 222 U. S. 114, followed in Synnott v.
Tombstone Cons. Mines Co., 749.

Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Louisiana Railroad Commission, 232 U. S.
338, followed in Gilson v. United States, 380.

The Blackheath, 195 U. S. 361, followed in Atlantic Transport Co. v.
Imbrovek, 52.

Trono v. United States, 199 U. S. 521, followed in Ocampo v. United
States, 91.

United States v. Beatty, 232 U. S. 463, followed in Meeker v. Lehigh Val-
ley R. R. Co., 749.

United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co., 213 U. S. 366, followed in Tap
Line Cases, 1.

United States v. Lynah, 188 U. S. 445, followed in United States v. Buf-
falo Pitts Co., 228.

Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, followed in Lewiston v.
Chamberlain, 751.

Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, followed in Meeker v. Lehigh Valley
R. R. Co., 749.

Yazoo & M. V. Ry. Co. v. Greenwood Grocery Co., 227 U. S. 1, followed
in Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Beatty, 753.

York v. Texas, 137 U. S. 15, followed in Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v.
Goodrich, 754.

Zeller v. New Jersey, 231 U. S. 737, followed in Egan v. New Jersey, 751.

CERTIORARI.

See APPEAL AND ERROR, 2.

CHATTEL MORTGAGES.
See PLEDGE, 1.

CHIPPEWA INDIANS.

See INDIANS, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11.

CLAIMS AGAINST UNITED STATES.

1. Tucker Act; conclusiveness of findings of fact; questions open in this
court.

In cases brought under the Tucker Act and coming to this court from
a District or Circuit Court the findings of fact of the trial court are
conclusive, and the question here, unless the record would warrant
the conclusion that the ultimate facts are not supported by any
evidence whatever, is whether the conclusions of law are warranted
by the facts found. (Chase v. United States, 155 U. S. 489.)
United States v. Buffalo Pitts Co., 228.

2. Tucker Act; jurisdiction under; implied contract on part of Government.
Where property is left with the officer of the Government who has
charge of the work by the owner relying upon the fact that his title
is not disputed and upon representations made to him that pay-
ment would be recommended for such use, and Congress has given
authority to appropriate property necessary for the particular
work and to pay therefor, there is an implied contract on the part
of the Government to pay for the property and jurisdiction exists
under the Tucker Act. United States v. Lynah, 188 U. S. 445, fol-
lowed, and Harley v. United States, 198 U. S. 229, distinguished.
Ib.

CLAPP AMENDMENT.

See INDIANS, 4.

CLASSIFICATION.

See CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 25, 26, 27, 30-34;

GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS, 2;

INDIANS, 5.

CLOUD ON TITLE.

See ACTIONS, 1;

JURISDICTION, C 1, 2, 3;

LOCAL LAW (Miss.).

COAL LANDS.

See PUBLIC Lands, 1.