페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

1770.

“ Speaking of Arthur Murphy, whom he very much loved, 'I don't know Arat. 61. (said he,) that Arthur can be classed with the very first dramatick writers;

yet at present I doubt much whether we have any thing superior to Arthur.'

Speaking of the national debt, he said, it was an idle dream to suppose that the country could sink under it. Let the publick creditors be ever lo clamorous, the interest of millions must ever prevail over that of thousands.

“ Of Dr. Kennicott's Collations, he observed, that though the text should not be much mended thereby, yet it was no small advantage to know, that we had as good a text as the most consummate industry and diligence could procure.

“ Johnson observed, that so many objections might be made to every thing, that nothing could overcome them but the necessity of doing something. No inan would be of any profession, as simply opposed to not being of it: but every one must do something.

“ He remarked, that a London parish was a very comfortless thing, for the clergyman seldom knew the face of one out of ten of his parishioners.

« Of the late Mr. Mallet he spoke with no great respect : faid, he was ready for any dirty job : that he had wrote against Byng at the instigation of the ministry, and was equally ready to write for him, provided he found his account in it.

“ A gentleman who had been very unhappy in marriage, married immediately after his wife died : Johnson said, it was the triumph of hope over experience.

“ He observed, that a man of sense and education should meet a suitable companion in a wife. It was a miserable thing when the conversation could only be such as, whether the mutton should be boiled or roasted, and probably a dispute about that.

“ He did not approve of late marriages, observing, that more was lost in point of time, than compensated for by any possible advantages. Even ill assorted marriages were preferable to cheerless celibacy.

« Of old Sheridan he remarked, that he neither wanted parts or literature, but that his vanity and Quixotism obscured his merits.

“ He said, foppery was never cured; it was the bad stamina of the mind, which, like those of the body, were never rectified : once a coxcomb, and always a coxcomb.

“ Being told that Gilbert Cowper called him the. Caliban of literature; "Well, (faid he,) I must dub him the Punchinello.'

Speaking

1770.

Speaking of the old Earl of Corke and Orrery, he said, that man spent his life in catching at an object, [literary eminence,] which he had not power Ærat. 61. to grasp.' “ He often used to quote, with great pathos, those fine lines of Virgil :

Optima quæque dies miseris mortalibus ævi
Prima fugit ; fubeunt morbi, tristisque senečtus,

Et labor, et dure rapit inclementia inortis.'
“ To find a substitution for violated morality, he said, was the leading
feature in all perversions of religion.”

1771.

In 1771 he published another political pamphlet, entitled “ Thoughts on the late Transactions respecting Falkland's INands,” in which, upon materials furnished to him by ministry, and upon general topicks expanded in his richest style, he successfully endeavoured to persuade the nation that it was wife and laudable to suffer the question of right to remain undecided, rather than involve our country in another war, It has been suggested by some, with what truth I shall not take upon me to decide, that he rated the consequence of those islands to Great-Britain too low. But however this may be, every humane mind must surely applaud the earnestness with which he averted the calamity of war; a calamity so dreadful, that it is astonishing how civilised, nay, Christian nations, can deliberately continue to renew it. His description of its miseries in this pamphlet, is one of the finest pieces of eloquence in the English language. Upon this occasion, too, we find Johnson lashing the party in opposition with unbounded severity, and making the fullest use of what he ever reckoned a most effectual argumentative instrument, contempt. His character of their very able mysterious champion, Junius, is executed with all the force of his genius, and finished with the highest care. He seems to have exulted in sallying forth to single combat against the boasted and formidable hero, who bade defiance to“ principalities and powers, and the rulers of this world.”

This pamphlet, it is observable, was softened in one particular, after the first edition; for the conclusion of Mr. George Grenville's character stood thus: “Let him not, however, be depreciated in his grave. He had powers not universally possessed: could he have enforced payment of the Manilla ransom, he could have counted it.Which, instead of retaining its Ny sharp point, was reduced to a mere flat unmeaning expression, or, if I may use the word,-triisi : “He had powers not universally possessed: and if he sometimes erred, he was likewise sometimes right.”

Mr.

Y y

1771.

Mr. Strahan, the printer, who had been long in intimacy with Johnson, in the course of his literary labours, who was at once his friendly agent in receiving his pension for him, and his banker in supplying him with money, when he wanted it; who was himself now a Member of Parliament, and who loved much to be employed in political negociation; thought he should do eminent service, both to government and Johnson, if he could be the means of his getting a seat in the House of Commons. With this view, he wrote a · letter to one of the Secretaries of the Treasury, of which he gave me a copy in his own hand-writing, which is as follows:

« SIR,

“ YOU will easily recollect, when I had the honour of waiting upon you some time ago, I took the liberty to observe to you, that Dr. Johnson would make an excellent figure in the House of Commons, and heartily wished he had a seat there. My reasons are briefly these:

“ I know his perfect good affection to his Majesty, and his government, which I am certain he wishes to support by every means in his power.

“ He possesses a great share of manly, nervous, and ready eloquence; is quick in discerning the strength and weakness of an argument; can express himself with clearnefs and precision, and fears the face of no man alive.

“ His known character, as a man of extraordinary sense and unimpeached virtue, would secure him the attention of the House, and could not fail to give him a proper weight there.

“ He is capable of the greatest application, and can undergo any degree of labour, where he sees it necessary, and where his heart and affections are strongly engaged. His Majesty's ministers might therefore securely depend on his doing, upon every proper occasion, the utmost that could be expected from him. They would find him ready to vindicate such measures as tended to promote the stability of government, and resolute and steady in carrying them into execution. Nor is any thing to be apprehended from the supposed impetuosity of his temper. To the friends of the King you will find him a lamb, to his enemies a lion.

“ For these reasons, I humbly apprehend that he would be a very able and useful member. And I will venture to say, the employment would not be disagreeable to him; and knowing, as I do, his strong affection to the King, his ability to serve him in that capacity, and the extreme ardour with which I am convinced he would engage in that service, I must repeat, that I wish most heartily to see him in the House. 4

5. If

1771.

“ If you think this worthy of attention, you will be pleased to take a convenient opportunity of mentioning it to Lord North. If his Lordship should happily approve of it, I shall have the satisfaction of having been, in some degree, the humble instrument of doing my country, in my opinion, a very essential service. I know your good-nature, and your zeal for the publick welfare, will plead my excuse for giving you this trouble. . I am, with the greatest respect, Sir,

« Your most obedient and humble servant, o New-ftreet, March 30, 1771.

WILLIAM STRAHAN."

[ocr errors]

This recommendation we know was not effectual; but how, or for what reason, can only be conjectured. It is not to be believed that Mr. Strahan would have applied, unless Johnson had approved of it. I never heard him mention the subject; but at a later period of his life, when Sir Joshua Reynolds told him that Mr. Edmund Burke had said, that if he had come early into parliament, he certainly would have been the greatest speaker that ever was there, Johnson exclaimed, “I should like to try my hand now."

It has been much agitated among his friends and others, whether he would have been a powerful speaker in Parliament, had he been brought in when advanced in life. I am inclined to think, that his extensive knowledge, his quickness and force of mind, his vivacity and richness of expression, his wit and humour, and above all his poignancy of sarcasm, would have had great effect in a popular assembly; and that the magnitude of his figure, and striking peculiarity of his manner, would have aided the effect. But I remember it was observed by Mr. Flood, that Johnson having been long used to sententious brevity and the Short flights of conversation, might have failed in that continued and expanded kind of argument, which is requisite in stating complicated matters in publick speaking; and as a proof of this he mentioned the supposed speeches in Parliament written by him for the magazine, none of which, in his opinion, were at all like real debates. The opinion of one who is himself so eminent an orator, must be allowed to have great weight. It was confirmed by Sir William Scott, who mentioned, that Johnson had told him, that he had several times tried to speak in the Society of Arts and Sciences, but “ had found he could not get on.” From Mr. William Gerard Hamilton I have heard, that Johnson, when observing to him that it was prudent for a man who had not been accustomed to speak in publick to begin his speech in as simple a manner as possible, acknowledged that he rose in that Yy 2

society

1771.

society to deliver a speech which he had prepared; “but (said he,) all Ætat. z. my Aowers of oratory forsook me.” I however cannot help wishing, that

he had “tried his hand” in parliament; and I wonder that ministry did not make the experiment.

I at length renewed a correspondence which had been too long discontinued :

To Dr. JOHNSON. " MY DEAR SIR,

Edinburgh, April 18, 1771. « I CAN now fully understand those intervals of silence in your correspondence with me, which have often given me anxiety and uneasiness; for although I am conscious that my veneration and love for Mr. Johnson have never in the least abated, yet I have deferred for almost a year and a half to write to him.”

In the subsequent part of this letter, I gave him an account of my comfortable life as a married man, and a lawyer in practice at the Scotch bar; invited him to Scotland, and promised to attend him to the Highlands, and Hebrides,

TO JAMES Boswell, Esq. « DEAR SIR,

“ If you are now able to comprehend that I might neglect to write without diminution of affection, you have taught me, likewise, how that neglect may be uneasily felt without resentment. I wished for your letter a long time, and when it came, it amply recompensed the delay. I never was so much pleased as now with your account of yourself; and sincerely hope, that between publick business, improving studies, and domestick pleasures, neither melancholy nor caprice will find any place for entrance. Whatever philofophy may determine of material nature, it is certainly true of intellectual nature, that it abhors a vacuum : our minds cannot be empty; and evil will break in upon them, if they are not pre-occupied by good. My dear Sir, mind your studies, mind your business, make your lady happy, and be a good Chriftian. After this,

tristitiam et metus " Trades protervis in mare Creticum

< Portare ventis.'

« 이전계속 »