« 이전계속 »
common prejudice should not be found in one whose trade it is to rectify errour.”
A gentleman having come in who was to go as a Mate in the ship along with Mr. Banks and Dr. Solander, Dr. Johnson asked what were the names of the ships destined for the expedition. The gentleman answered, they were once to be called the Drake and the Raleigh, but now they were to be called the Refolution and the Adventure. Johnson. “ Much better; for had the Raleigh returned without going round the world, it would have been ridiculous. To give them the names of the Drake and the Raleigh was laying a trap for satire.” Boswell. “ Had not you fome desire to go upon this expedition, Sir?” Johnson.“ Why yes; but I foon laid it aside. Sir, there is very little of intellectual in the course. Besides, I see but at a small distance. So it was not worth my while to go to see birds fly, which I should not have seen fly; and fishes swim, which I should not have seen swim.”
The gentleman being gone, and Dr. Johnson having left the room for some time, a debate arose between the Reverend Mr. Stockdale and Mrs. Desmoulins, whether Mr. Banks and Dr. Solander were entitled to any share of glory from their expedition. When Dr. Johnson returned to us, I told him the subject of their dispute. Johnson. Why, Sir, it was properly for botany that they went out: I believe they thought only of culling of simples.”
I thanked him for shewing civilities to Beattie. “ Sir, (said he,) I should thank you. We all love Beattie. Mrs. Thrale says, if ever she has another husband, she'll have Beattie. He funk upon us that he was married ; else we should have shewn his lady more civilities. She is a very fine woman. But how can you shew civilities to a non-entity? I did not think he had been married. Nay, I did not think about it one way or other; but he did not tell us of his lady till late.”
He then spoke of St. Kilda, the most remote of the Hebrides. I told him, I thought of buying it. Johnson. “ Pray do, Sir. We shall go and pafs a winter amid the blasts there. We shall have fine fish, and we shall take some dried tongues with us, and some books. We shall have a strong built vesel, and some Orkney men to navigate her. We must build a tolerable house: but we may carry with us a wooden house ready made, and requiring nothing but to be put up. Consider, Sir, by buying St. Kilda, you may keep the people from falling into worse hands. We must give them a clergyman, and he shall be one of Beattie's choosing. He shall be educated at Marischal College. I'll be your Lord Chancellor, or what you please.” Boswell. " Are you serious, Sir, in advising me to buy St. Kilda ? for if you should
advise me to go to Japan, I believe I should do it.” Johnson. “Why yes, Sir, I am serious." Boswell. “ Why then I'll see what can be done."
Altat. 63. I
gave him an account of the two parties in the church of Scotland, those for supporting the rights of patrons, independent of the people, and those against it. Johnson. “ It should be settled one way or other. I cannot wish well to a popular election of the clergy, when I consider that it occasions such animosities, such unworthy courting of the people, such Nanders between the contending parties, and other disadvantages. It is enough to allow the people to remonstrate against the nomination of a minister for folid reasons ;” (I suppose he meant heresy or immorality.) He was engaged to dine abroad, and asked me to return to him in the evening at nine, which I accordingly did.
We drank tea with Mrs. Williams, who told us a story of fecond sight, which happened in Wales where she was born.-He listened to it very attentively, and said he should be glad to have some instances of that faculty well authenticated. His elevated wish for more and more evidence for spirit, in opposition to the groveling belief of materialism, led him to a love of such mysterious disquisitions. He again justly observed, that we could have no certainty of the truth of supernatural appearances, unless something was told us which we could not know by ordinary means, or something done which could not be done but by supernatural power ; that Pharaoh in reason and justice required such evidence from Moses; nay, that our Saviour said, “If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin.” He had said in the morning, that “Macaulay's History of St. Kilda,” was very well written, except some foppery about liberty and Navery. I mentioned to him that Macaulay told me, he was advised to leave out of his book the wonderful story that upon the approach of a stranger all the inhabitants catch cold; but that it had been so well authenticated, he determined to retain it. Johnson. “Sir, to leave things out of a book, merely because people tell you they will not be believed, is meanness. Macaulay acted with more magnanimity.”
We talked of the Roman Catholick religion, and how little difference there was in essential matters between ours and it. Johnson. " True, Sir: all denominations of Christians have really little difference in point of doctrine, though they may differ widely in external forms. There is a prodigious difference between the external form of one of your Presbyterian churches in Scotland, and a church in Ital; ; yet the doctrine taught is essentially the fame."
I mentioned the petition to Parliament for removing the subscription to the Thirty-nine Articles. Johnson. “ It was soon thrown out. Şir, they talk
of not making boys at the University subscribe to what they do not understand; but they ought to consider, that our Universities were founded to bring up members for the Church of England, and we must not supply our enemies with arms from our arsenal. No, Sir, the meaning of subscribing is, not that they fully understand all the articles, but that they will adhere to the Church of England. Now take it in this way, and suppose that they should only subscribe their adherence to the Church of England, there would be still the same difficulty; for still the young men would be subscribing to what they do not understand. For if you should ask them, what do you mean by the Church of England? Do you know in what it differs from the Presbyterian Church? from the Romish Church ? from the Greek Church ? from the Coptick Church? they could not tell you. So, Sir, it comes to the same thing.” Boswell. " But, Sir, would it not be sufficient to subscribe the Bible ?" Johnson. “ Why no, Sir ; for all sects will subscribe the Bible; nay, the Mahometans will subscribe the Bible, for the Mahometans acknowledge Jesus CHRIST, as well as Moses, but maintain that God sent Mahomet as a still greater prophet than either.”
I mentioned the motion to abolish the fast of the 30th of January. Johnson. “Why, Sir, I could have wished that it had been a temporary act, perhaps, to have expired with the century. I am against abolishing it; because that would be declaring it was wrong to establish it; but I should have no objection to make an act, continuing it for another century, and then letting it expire.”
He disapproved of the Royal Marriage Bill; “ Because (said he,). I would not have the people think that the validity of marriage depends on the will of man, or that the right of a King depends on the will of man. I should not have been against making the marriage of any of the royal family, without the approbation of King and Parliament, highly criminal.”
In the morning we had talked of old families, and the respect due to them. Johnson. “Sir, you have a right to that kind of respect, and are arguing for yourself
. I am for supporting the principle, and am disinterested in doing it, as I have no such right.” Boswell. “ Why, Sir, it is one more incitement to a man to do well.” Johnson. “ Yes, Sir, and it is a matter of opinion, very necessary to keep society together. What is it but opinion, by which we have a respect for authority, that prevents us, who are the rabble, from-rising up and pulling down you who are gentlemen from your places, and saying, • We will be gentlemen in our turn?' Now, Sir, that respect for authority is much more easily granted to a man whose father has had it, than to an upstart, and fo Society is more easily supported.” Boswell.." Perhaps, Sir, it might be
done by the respect belonging to office, as among the Romans, where the dress,
man of family will be preferred. People will prefer a man for whose father
I gave him an account of the excellent mimickry of a friend of mine in
who was a wonderful mimiek, and used to make me laugh immoderately. I have heard the is now gone mad.” Boswell. “It is amazing how a mimick can not only give you the gestures and voice of a person whom he represents ; but even what a person would say on any particular subject.” Johnson. “Why, Sir, you are to consider that the manner and some particular phrases of a person do much to impress you with an idea of him, and you are not sure that he would say what the mimick says in his character.” Boswell. “I don't think Foote a good mimick, Sir." Johnson. “ No, Sir; his imitations are not like. He gives you something different from himself, but not the character which he means to affume. He goes out of himself without going into other people. He cannot take off any person unless he is very strongly marked, such as George Faulkner. He is like a painter, who can draw the portrait of a man who has a wen upon his . face, and who, therefore, is easily known. If a man hops upon one leg; Foote can hop upon one leg. But he has not that nice discrimination which .
friend seems to poffefs. Foote is, however, very entertaining, with a kind of conversation between wit and buffoonery."
On Monday, March 23, I found him busy, preparing a fourth edition of his folio Dictionary. Mr. Peyton, one of his original amanuenses, was writing for him. I put him in mind of a meaning of the word, fide, which he had omitted, viz. relationship; as, father's side, mother's side. He inserted it. I asked him if humiliating was a good word. He said, he had seen it frequently used, but he did not know it to be legitimate English. He would not admit civilization, but only civility. With great deference to him, I thought civilization, from to civilize, better in the sense opposed to barbarity, than civility, as it is better to have a distinct word for each sense, than one word with two senses, which civility is, in his way of using it.
He seemed busy about some sort of chymical operation. I was entertained by observing how he contrived to send Mr. Peyton on an errand, without seeming to degrade him. “Mr. Peyton,-Mr. Peyton,-will you be so good as to take a walk to Temple-bar? You will there see a chymist's shop; at which you will be pleased to buy for me an ounce of oil of vitriol; not spirit of vitriol, but oil of vitriol. It will cost three half-pence.” Peyton immediately went, and returned with it, and told him it cost but a penny.
I then reminded him of the schoolmaster's cause, and proposed to read to him the printed papers concerning it. “No, Sir, (said he,) I can read quicker than I can hear.” So he read them to himself.
After he had read for some time, we were interrupted by the entrance of Mr. Kristrom, a Swede, who was tutor to some young gentlemen in the city. He told me, that there was a very good History of Sweden, by Daline. Having at that time an intention of writing the history of that country, I asked Dr. Johnson whether one might write a history of Sweden without going thither. “Yes, Sir, (said he,) one for common use.”
We talked of languages. Johnson observed, that Leibnitz had made some progress in a work, tracing all languages up to the Hebrew. “ Why, Sir, (said he,) you would not imagine that the French jour, day, is derived from the Latin dies, and yet nothing is more certain ; and the intermediate steps are very clear. From dies, comes diurnus. Diu is, by inaccurate ears or inaccurate pronunciation, easily confounded with giu ; then the Italians form a substantive of the ablative of an adjective, and thence giurno, or, as they make it, giorno ; which is readily contracted into giour, or jour.” He observed, that the Bohemian language was true Sclavonick. The Swede said, it had some