페이지 이미지

1773. He described the father of one of his friends thus : “ Sir, he was so exuberant Ærat. 67. a talker at publick meetings, that the gentlemen of his county were afraid of

him. No business could be done for his declamation.”

He did not give me full credit when I mentioned that I had carried on a short conversation by signs with some Esquimaux, who were then in London, particularly with one of them who was a priest. He thought I could not make them understand me. No man was more incredulous as to particular facts, which were at all extraordinary ; and therefore no man was more scrupulously inquisitive, in order to discover the truth.

I dined with him this day at the house of my friends, Messieurs Edward and Charles Dilly, booksellers in the Poultry : there were present, their elder brother Mr. Dilly of Bedfordshire, Dr. Goldsmith, Mr. Langton, Mr. Claxton, Reverend Dr. Mayo a dissenting minister, the Reverend Mr. Toplady, and my friend the Reverend Mr. Temple.

Hawkesworth's compilation of the voyages to the South Sea being mentioned ;-Johnson. “Sir, if you talk of it as a subject of commerce, it will be gainful; if as a book that is to increase human knowledge, I believe there will not be much of that. Hawkesworth can tell only what the voyagers have told him, and they have found very little, only one new animal, I think.” Boswell. " But many insects, Sir.” Johnson. “Why, Sir, as to insects, Ray reckons of British insects twenty thousand species. They might have have staid at home and discovered enough in that way.”

Talking of birds, I mentioned Mr. Daines Barrington's ingenious Efay against the received notion of their migration. Johnson. “ I think we have as good evidence for the migration of woodcocks as can be desired. We find they disappear at a certain time of the year, and appear again at a certain time of the year; and some of them, when weary in their flight, have been known to alight on the rigging of ships far out at sea.” One of the company observed, that there had been instances of some of them found in summer in Efex. Johnson. “ Sir, that strengthens our argument. Exceptio probat regulam. Some being found fhews, that, if all remained, many would be found. A few fick or lame ones may be found.” GOLDSMITH. “ There is a partial migration of the swallows; the stronger ones migrate, the others do not.”

Boswell. “ I am well assured that the people of Otaheite who have the bread-tree, the fruit of which serves them for bread, laughed heartily when they were informed of the tedious process necessary with us to have bread ;--plowing, sowing, harrowing, reaping, threshing, grinding, baking.” Johnson. “ Why, Sir, all ignorant savages will laugh when they are told of



[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

che advantages of civilized life. Were you to tell men who live without
houses, how we pile brick upon brick and rafter upon rafter, and that after a Ætat. 64.
house is raised to a certain height, a man tumbles off a scaffold and breaks
his neck, he would laugh heartily at our folly in building; but it does not
follow that men are better without houses. No, Sir, (holding up a Nice of a
good loaf,) this is better than the bread-tree.”

He repeated an argument, which is to be found in his “Rambler," against
the notion that the brute creation is endowed with the faculty of reason: “birds
build by instinct; they never improve: they build their first nest as well as
any one that they ever build.” GOLDSMITH. “ Yet we fee if you take away
a bird's nest with the eggs in it, she will make a nighter nest and lay again.”
JOHNSON. “ Sir, that is because at first she has full time, and makes her nest
deliberately. In the case you mention she is pressed to lay, and must there-
fore make her nest quickly, and consequently it will be night.” GOLDSMITH.
“ The nidification of birds is what is least known in natural history, though
one of the most curious things in it.”

I introduced the subject of toleration.. Johnson. “ Every society has a right to preserve publick peace and order, and therefore has a good right to prohibit the propagation of opinions which have a dangerous tendency. To say the magistrate has this right, is using an inadequate word : it is the fociety for which the magistrate is agent. He may be morally or theologically wrong in restraining the propagation of opinions which he thinks dangerous, but he is politically right.” Mayo. “ I am of opinion, Sir, that every man is entitled to liberty of conscience in religion; and that the magistrate cannot restrain that right.” JohnsON. '“ Sir, I agree with you. Every man has a right to -liberty of conscience, and with that the magistrate cannot interfere. People confound liberty of thinking with liberty of talking; nay, with liberty of preaching. Every man has a physical right to think as he pleases; for it cannot be discovered how he thinks. He has not a moral right; for he ought to inform himself and think justly. But, Sir, no member of a fociety has a right to teach any doctrine contrary to what that fociety holds to be true. The magistrate, I say, may be wrong in what he thinks; but, while he thinks himself right, he may, and ought to enforce what he thinks.” Mayo. “ Then, Sir, we are to remain always in errour, and truth never can prevail; and the magistrate was right in persecuting the first Christians." Johnson. “Sir, the only method by which religious truth can be established is by martyrdom. The magistrate has a right to enforce what he thinks; and he who is conscious of the truth has a right to fuffer. I am afraid there is no other way of ascertaining the




Ætat. 64.

truth, but by persecution on the one hand and enduring it on the other."
GOLDSMITH. “ But how is a man to act, Sir ? Though firmly convinced of
the truth of his doctrine, may he not think it wrong to expose himself to
persecution ? Has he a right to do so? Is it not, as it were, committing
voluntary suicide ?” Johnson. “ Sir, as to voluntary suicide, as you call it,
there are twenty thousand men in an army who will go without scruple to le
shot at, and mount a breach for five-pence a day.” GOLDSMITH. “ But have
they a moral right to do this?” JOHNSON. “Nay, Sir, if you will not take
the universal opinion of mankind, I have nothing to say. If mankind cannot
defend their own way of thinking, I cannot defend it. Sir, if a man is in
doubt whether it would be better for him to expose himself to martyrdom or
not, he should not do it. He must be convinced that he has a delegation
from heaven.” GOLDSMITH. “I would consider whether there is the greater
chance of good or evil upon the whole. If I see a man who has fallen into a
well, I would wish to help him out; but if there is a greater probability that
he shall pull me in, than that I shall pull him out, I would not attempt it. So
were I to go to Turkey, I might with to convert the Grand Signor to the
Christian faith ; but when I considered that I should probably be put to death
without effectuating my purpose in any degree, I thould keep myself quiet.”
Johnson. “Sir, you must consider that we have perfect and imperfect obli-
gations. Perfect obligations, which are generally not to do something, are

clear and positive; as, thou shalt not kill.' But charity, for instance, is
not definable by limits. It is a duty to give to the poor; but no man can
say how much another should give to the poor, or when a man has given too
little to save his soul. In the same manner, it is a duty to instruct the igno-
rant, and of consequence to convert infidels to Christianity ; but no man in
the common course of things is obliged to carry this to such a degree as to
incur the danger of martyrdom, as no man is obliged to strip himself to the
shirt in order to give charity. I have said, that a man must be persuaded
that he has a particular delegation from heaven.” GOLDSMITH. “ How is
this to be known ? Our first reformers, who were burnt for not believing
bread and wine to be Christ."- Johnson. (interrupting him,) “Sir, they
were not burnt for not believing bread and wine to be CHRIST, but for insulting
those who did believe it. And, Sir, when the first reformers began, they did
not intend to be martyred: as many of them ran away as could.” Boswell.
“ But, Sir, there was your countryman, Elwal, who you told me challenged
King George with his black-guards and his red-guards.” Johnson. “My
countryman, Elwal, Sir, should have been put in the stocks; a proper pulpit



[ocr errors]

for him, and he'd have had a numerous audience. A man who preaches in
the stocks will always have hearers enough.” Boswell. “But Elwal thought Ætat. Tas
himself in the right.” Johnson. “We are not providing for mad people ;
there are places for them in the neighbourhood,” (meaning Moorfields.)
MAYO. “But, Sir, is it not very hard that I should not be allowed to teach my
children what I really believe to be the truth ?” Johnson. “Why, Sir, you
might contrive to teach your children extrà scandalum ; but, Sir, the magistrate,
if he knows it, has a right to restrain you. Suppose you teach


children to be thieves ?” Mayo. “This is making a joke of the subject.” Johnson. “ Nay, Sir, take it thus :--that you teach them the community of goods, for which there are as many plausible arguments as for most erroneous doctrines. You teach them that all things at first were in common, and that no man had a right to any thing but as he laid his hands upon it; and that this still is, or ought to be, the rule amongst mankind. Here, Sir, you fap a great principle in fociety,—property. And don't you think the magistrate would have a right to prevent you? Or, suppose you should teach your children the notions of the Adamites, and they should run naked into the streets, would not the magistrate have a right to flog 'em into their doublets ?” Mayo. “ I think the magistrate has no right to interfere till there is some overt act.” Boswell. “So, Sir, though he sees an enemy to the state charging a blunderbuss, he is not to interfere till it is fired off.” Mayo. “ He must be sure of its direction against the state.” Johnson. “ The magistrate is to judge of that.--He has no right to restrain your thinking, because the evil centers in yourself. If a man were sitting at this table, and chopping off his fingers, the magistrate, as guardian of the community, has no authority to restrain him, however he might do it from kindness as a parent.—Though, indeed, upon more confideration, I think he may; as it is probable that he who is chopping off his own fingers, may soon proceed to chop off those of other people. If I think it right to steal Mr. Dilly's plate, I am a bad man; but he can say nothing

If I make an open declaration that I think so, he will keep me out of his house. If I put forth my hand, I shall be sent to Newgate. This is the gradation of thinking, preaching, and acting: if a man thinks erroneously, he may keep his thoughts to himself, and nobody will trouble him; if he preaches erroneous doctrine, society may expel him; if he acts in consequence of it, the law takes place, and he is hanged.” Mayo. “But, Sir, ought not Christians to have liberty of conscience ?” Johnson. “ I have already told you so, Sir. You are coming back to where you were.” Boswell. “ Dr. Mayo is always taking a return post-chaise, and going the stage over again. Hhh


to me.


Ætat. 64


He has it at half price.” Johnson. “ Dr. Mayo, like other champions for
unlimited toleration, has got a set of words'. Sir, it is no matter, politically,
whether the magistrate be right or wrong. Suppose a club were to be formed
to drink confusion to King George the Third, and a happy restoration to
Charles the Third; this would be very bad with respect to the state; but
every member of that club must either conform to its rules, or be turned out
of it. Old Baxter, I remember, maintains, that the magistrate should tolerate
all things that are tolerable.' This is no good definition of toleration upon
any principle; but it shews that he thought some things were not tolerable.”
Toplady. “ Sir, you have untwisted this difficult subject with great

During this argument, Goldsmith sat in restless agitation, from a wish to get
in, and shine. Finding himself excluded, he had taken his hat to go away,
but remained for some time with it in his hand, like a gamester, who at the
clofe of a long night, lingers for a little while, to see if he can have a favour-
able opening to finish with success. Once when he was beginning to speak, ,
he found himself overpowered by the loud voice of Johnson, who was at the
opposite end of the table, and did not perceive Goldsmith's attempt. Thus
disappointed of his wish to obtain the attention of the company, Goldsmith in a
passion threw down his hat, looking angrily at Johnson, and exclaiming in a bitter
tone, Take it.When Toplady was going to speak, Johnson uttered some
sound, which led Goldsmith to think that he was beginning again, and taking the
words from Toplady. Upon which, he seized this opportunity of venting his
own envy and spleen, under the pretext of supporting another person : “Sir,
(said he to Johnson,) the gentleman has heard you patiently for an hour;
pray allow us now to hear him.” Johnson. (sternly,) “ Sir, I was not
interrupting the gentleman. I was only giving him a signal of my attention,
Sir, you are impertinent." Goldsmith made no reply, but continued in the
company for some time.

A gentleman present ventured to ask Dr. Johnson if there was not a material difference as to toleration of opinions which lead to action, and opinions merely speculative;, for instance, would it be wrong in the magistrate to tolerate

9 Dr. Mayo's calm temper and steady perseverance, rendered him an admirable subject for the exercise of Dr. Johnson's powerful abilities. He never flinched; but, after reiterated blows, remained seemingly unmoved as at the first. The scintillations of Johnson's genius flashed every time he was ftruck, without his receiving any injury. Hence he obtained the epithet of The LITERARY ANVIL.


« 이전계속 »