페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

"(3) the Commission is unable to enter into a contract with any person on terms satisfactory to it to furnish from a privately owned plant or facility the product or services to be provided by the new project."

Approved July 22, 1963.

INDEX TO LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF PUBLIC LAW 88-72 (S. 1745)

(Page references are to the daily editions of the Congressional Record, 88th Cong., 1st sess.)

S. 1159 introduced March 21, 1963, by Senator Pastore (by request), 4389.

[ocr errors]

Hearings: Subcommittee on Legislation, April 9, 10 and May 2, 1963. Published under title "AEC Authorizing Legislation Fiscal Year 1964."

S. 1745 introduced June 19 by Senator Pastore as a "clean bill," superseding S. 1159, 10460.

H.R. 7139 (companion bill) reported in House June 21, 1963 (H. Rept. 446), 10809.

S. 1745 reported in Senate June 21, 1963 (S. Rept. 303), 10673.

S. 1745 considered and passed in Senate by voice vote, 10929-10932.
S. 1745 considered and passed in House by voice vote, 11500-11511.
Examined and signed by President pro tempore of Senate July 11,
11739.

Examined and signed by Speaker of House July 11, 11811.

Presented to the President July 11, 11741.

S. 1745 approved by the President July 22 as Public Law 88-72.

COMPANION BILL-H.R. 7139

H.R. 5036 introduced March 21, 1963, by Mr. Holifield (by request),

4384.

Hearings: As listed above.

H.R. 7139 introduced June 19 as "clean bill" by Mr. Holifield, 10604.

PUBLIC LAW 88-189 (AEC FISCAL YEAR 1964 SUPPLE-
MENTAL AUTHORIZATION ACT)

[88TH CONGRESS, S. 2267]

[NOVEMBER 29, 1963]

AN ACT

To amend Public Law 88-72 to increase the authorization for appropriations to the Atomic Energy Commission in accordance with section 261 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 101 of Public Law 88-72 is hereby amended by striking the figure "172,562,000" and inserting in lieu thereof the figure "$190,507,000".

SEC. 2. Section 101 (d) of Public Law 88–72 is amended by adding at the end thereof:

"Project 64-d-10, occupational health laboratory, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, New Mexico, $1,650,000.

"Project 64-d-11, high temperature chemistry facility, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, New Mexico, $1,435,000.

"Project 64-d-12, plutonium research support building, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, New Mexico, $655,000.

"Project 64-d-13, radiochemistry building, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, California, $5,900,000.

"Project 64-d-14, hazards control addition, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, California, $1,000,000.

"Project 64-d-15, plant engineering and services building, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, California, $1,400,000.

"Project 64-d-16, west cafeteria addition, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, California, $255,000.

"Project 64-d-17, craft shop addition, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, California, $200,000.

"Project 64-d-18, development laboratory, Sandia Base, New Mexico, $3,780,000.

"Project 64-d-19, explosive facilities, Sandia Base, New Mexico, $540,000.

"Project 64-d-20, classified technical reports building addition, Sandia Base, New Mexico, $500,000.

"Project 64-d-21, control point additions, Nevada Test Site, $630,000."

[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]

Approved November 29, 1963.

INDEX TO LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF PUBLIC LAW 88-189 (S. 2267)

(Page references are to the daily editions of the Congressional Record, 88th Cong., 1st sess.)

S. 2267 introduced by Senator Pastore (by request) October 29, 1963, 19413.

H.R. 8971 (companion bill)_reported out November 20 by Mr. Holifield (H. Rept. 911), 21457.

S. 2267 reported in Senate November 20, 1963, by Senator Pastore (S. Rept. 647), 21383.

S. 2267 considered and passed in Senate November 21, 21464–65.
S. 2267 considered and passed in House November 26, 21707.
Examined and signed by Speaker of House November 29, 21856.
Examined and signed by Acting President pro tempore November 29,

[graphic]

21973.

Presented to the President November 29, 21979.

S. 2267 approved by the President November 29 as Public Law 88-189.

COMPANION BILL-H.R. 8971

H.R. 8971 introduced by Mr. Holifield (by request) October 30, 19638. Hearings: As listed above.

PUBLIC LAW 88-332 (AEC AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR

FISCAL YEAR 1965)

[88TH CONGRESS, H.R. 10945]

[JUNE 30, 1964]

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations to the Atomic Energy Commission in accordance with section 261 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SEC. 101. There is hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Atomic Energy Commission in accordance with the provisions of section 261 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the sum of $2,636,577,000 as follows:

(a) For "Operating expenses," $2,298,467,000: Provided, That in the total amount authorized by this subsection there is included the amount of $1,000,000, which is in addition to the amount of $5,000,000 previously authorized in section 110 of Public Law 86-457 for use in a cooperative program of research and development with the Government of Canada: Provided further, That in the total amount authorized by this subsection there is included the amount of $3,000,000 which is in addition to the sum of $22,500,000 previously authorized for carrying out the purposes of section 3 of Public Law 85-846, providing for cooperation with the European Atomic Energy Community.

(b) For "Plant and capital equipment," including construction, acquisition, or modification of facilities, including land acquisition; construction planning and design; and acquisition and fabrication of capital equipment not related to construction, $338,110,000 as follows: (1) SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS.—

Project 65-1-a, radio-surgery facility, Richland, Washington, $250,000.

Project 65-1-b, isotopes production plant, Richland, Washington, $9,000,000.

[graphic]

(2) ATOMIC WEAPONS.

[graphic]

Project 65-2-a, materials processing facilities, Mound Laboratory, Miamisburg, Ohio, $565,000.

Project 65-2-b, analytical laboratory expansion, Rocky Flats, Colorado, $3,000,000.

Project 65-2-c, weapons production, development and test installations, $10,000,000.

Project 65-2-d, process facility addition, Savannah River, South Carolina, $3,700,000.

Project 65-2-e, high velocity test facility, Sandia Base, New Mexico, $1,350,000.

(3) ATOMIC WEAPONS.

Project 65-3-a, environmental control facilities, Kansas City, Missouri, $1,000,000.

Project 65-3-b, utility and supporting services additions, Rocky Flats, Colorado, $2,245,000.

Project 65-3-c, supplemental water supply, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, New Mexico, $1,550,000.

Project 65-3-d, experimental physics facilities additions, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, California, $4,090,000.

Project 65-3-e, chemistry development facilities, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, California, $2,000,000.

Project 65-3-f, base support facilities, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, $620,000.

[graphic]

(4) REACTOR DEVELOPMENT.

Project 65-4-a, zero power plutonium reactor, National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho, $3,000,000.

Project 65-4-b, power burst facility, National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho, $8,100,000.

Project 65-4-c, research and development test plants, Project Rover, Los Alamos, Scientific Laboratory, New Mexico and Nevada Test Site, Nevada, $3,000,000.

Project 65-4-d, modifications to reactors, $3,000,000.

(5) PHYSICAL RESEARCH.—

[graphic]
[graphic]

[Project 65-5-a, Argonne advanced research reactor, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, $25,000,000.]66

Project 65-5-b, accelerator improvements, zero gradient synchrotron, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, $1,650,000. Project 65-5-c, electron linear accelerator, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, $875,000.

Project 65-5-d, accelerator and reactor additions and modifications, Brookhaven National Laboratory, New York, $1,700,000. Project 65-5-e, accelerator improvements, Cambridge and Princeton accelerators, $1,350,000.

Project 65-5-f, accelerator improvements, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley, California, $850,000.

Project 65-5-g, transuranium research laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, $1,850,000.

[graphic]

(6) PHYSICAL RESEARCH.

Project 65-6-a, lecture hall and cafeteria, Brookhaven National Laboratory, New York, $2,300,000.

Project 65-6-b, site utilities, Brookhaven National Laboratory, New York, $675,000.

Project 65-6-c, computer data processing building, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley, California, $2,400,000.

Project 65-6-d, heavy ion linear accelerator additions, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley, California, $525,000. Project 65-6-e, high energy physics laboratory, California Institute of Technology, California, $2,000,000.

[graphic]
[graphic]

(7) BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE.

[graphic]

Project 65-7-a, co-carcinogenesis research laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, $2,070,000.

Project 65-7-b, atmospheric physics building, Richland, Washington, $373,000.

Project 65-7-c, biomedical and animal laboratory, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, California, $3,500,000. (8) COMMUNITY.——

Project 65-8-a, classroom addition, Cumbres Junior High School, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $340,000.

Boa Public Law 90-289 (82 Stat. 96) (1968), sec. 107, rescinded authorization for this project, except for funds theretofore obligated and such additional funds as necessary to close out the project.

[graphic]
[merged small][ocr errors]

Project 65-8b, classroom addition, White Rock Elementary School, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $260,000.

Project 65-8-c, water distribution system additions, phase III, White Rock, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $290,000.

Project 65-8-d, sewage disposal plant, White Rock, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $610,000.

(9) GENERAL PLANT PROJECTS.-$43,250,000.

(10) CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND DESIGN.-$3,000,000.

(11) CAPITAL EQUIPMENT.--Acquisition and fabrication of capital equipment not related to construction, $186,772,000.

SEC. 102. PROJECT RESCISSIONS.-(a) Public Law 85-590, as amended, is further amended by rescinding therefrom authorization for projects, except for funds heretofore obligated, as follows:

Project 59-e-3, two accelerators, beam analyzing system and magnet, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, $950,000. Project 59-e-12, research and engineering reactor, Argonne National Laboratory, design and engineering, $1,000,000. (b) Public Law 86-50, as amended, is further amended by rescinding therefrom authorization for a project, except for funds heretofore obligated, as follows:

Project 60-e-7, nuclear test plant, Army Reactor Experimental Area (AREA), National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho, $5,000.000.

(c) Public Law 86-457, as amended, is further amended by rescinding therefrom authorization for a project, except for funds heretofore obligated, as follows:

Project 61-f-8, materials research laboratory, University of Illinois, $5,600,000.

(d) Public Law 87-315, as amended, is further amended by rescinding therefrom the authorization for a project, except for funds heretofore obligated, as follows:

Project 62-a-4, solvent purification installation, Savannah River, South Carolina, $500,000.

(e) Public Law 87-701, as amended, is further amended by rescinding therefrom authorization for projects, except for funds heretofore obligated, as follows:

Project 63-e-3, organic reactor project, $20,000,000.
Project 63-j-3, two mobile irradiators, $700,000.

(f) Public Law 88-72, as amended, is further amended by rescinding therefrom authorization for a project, except for funds heretofore obligated, as follows:

Project 64 e-6, support facilities for advanced space power systems, National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho, $1,800,000. SEC. 103. LIMITATIONS.-(a) The Commission is authorized to start any project set forth in subsections 101 (b) (1), (2), (4), and (5), only if the currently estimated cost of that project does not exceed by more than 25 per centum the estimated cost set forth for that project.

(b) The Commission is authorized to start any project set forth in subsections 101(b) (3), (6), (7), and (8), only if the currently estimated cost of that project does not exceed by more than 10 per centum the estimated cost set forth for that project.

(c) The Commission is authorized to start a project under subsection 101(b)(9) only if it is in accordance with the following:

[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
« 이전계속 »