VOLUME 2. 39097 REPORTS AND DECISIONS OF THE 1.8. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION OF THE UNITED STATES. April 5th, 1888 to March 25th, 1889. REPORTED BY THE COMMISSION. NEW YORK: 1889. TABLE OF CASES. . Page. Brady, John W. S., et al, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, et al 131 Burlington & Missouri River Railroad Company, in Nebraska, C. H. Griffee v. 301 Burlington & Missouri River Railroad Company, in Nebraska, et al, Lincoln Board of Trade v. 147 Business Men's Association of the State of Minnesota v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company 73 Business Men's Association of the State of Minnesota v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Rail- 52 Central Railroad of New Jersey, et al, New Jersey Fruit Exchange v. 142 Chamber of Commerce of the City of Milwaukee v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad Company, et al. 553 Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Company, et al. v. Michigan Congress Water Company 594 Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company, Business Men's Association of the State of Minnesota v. 73 Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company, of Logan, T. M. C., et al. 604 Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company, William P. Rend v. 540 Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, et al., Euclid Martin, et al., v. 25 Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Company In re 231 . РАС Company Lippman, L. & Co v. Illinois Central Railroad Company Lign, T. M. C. , et al., v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company Lymisville & Nashville Railroad Company Kentucky and Indiana Bridge Company t.. Murtiu, Euclid, et al. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, et al. Martin , John H., et al. v. Southern Pacific Company et al. Michigan Congress Water Co., of Chicago, and Grand Trunk Railway Company et al. Lissouri Pacific Railway Company, Lincoln Board Trade, o.. Xpers , Milton L., Survivor, etc., v. Pennsylvania Con pany, et al . New Jersey Fruit Exchange v. Central Railroad of N Jersey et al. leans & Texas Pacific Railway Company et al. & al., James C. Savery & Company, v. et al., Howell, Nathaniel W. et al v. d., Delaware State Grange of the Patro , John Henry, v. Pennsylvania Railroad vivor, etc., 0. PAGE. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company, William C. Scofield, et al., v. 90 Lincoln Board of Trade v. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad Company, in Nebraska, et al. 147 Lincoln Board of Trade v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company 15.5 Lippman, L. & Co v. Illinois Central Railroad Company 584 Logan, T. M. C., et al., v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company 604 Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company Kentucky and Indiana Bridge Company v.. 162 Martin, Euclid, et al. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, et al. 25 594 155 Myers, Milton L., Survivor, etc., v. Pennsylvania Com 573 pany, et al. 142 375 338 New Jersey Fruit Exchange v. Central Railroad of New Jersey et al. leans & Texas Pacific Railway Company et al. et al., James C. Savery & Company, v. et al., Howell, Nathaniel W. et al v. et al., Delaware State Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry, v. 272 309 pany et al. 131 359 Northern Pacific Railroad Company, James F. Slater, v. vivor, etc., v. 513 573 |