| Great Britain. Court of Chancery, John Herman Merivale - 1819 - 766 페이지
...where a bequest was in part only for a charitable purpose, as in the Attorney-General v. Doyley (b), but holds generally, that no charitable purpose was...is too indefinite for the Court to execute. I see DO substantial difference between this case and the former, and therefore consider the point as already... | |
| Roper Stote Donnison Roper - 1829 - 630 페이지
...however benevolent, unless they also came within the technical denomination of charitable purposes 1 If it might, consistently with the will, be applied...I should not entertain any doubt on the question." Again, in the more recent case of Ommanney v. Bvtcher,(h) Buckeridge Ball Jlckworth, after giving various... | |
| Leonard Shelford - 1836 - 1090 페이지
...benevolent, unless they also came within the technical denomination of charitable purposes. And as it might consistently with the will be applied to other than strictly charitable purposes, the trust was too indefinite for the court to execute. (u) 10 Ves. 543. See9Ves. 399; ante, p. 85. See Vezey... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1844 - 726 페이지
...integrity and discretion should agree on, and Sir William Grant held it void, saying, " If the property might, consistently with the will, be applied to other...trust is too indefinite for the Court to execute." Again, in Ommanney v. Butcher (c), Sir Thomas Plumer held that a bequest for private charity was void... | |
| James Hill - 1845 - 704 페이지
...he is bound so to apply it" (<>). And in another case the same learned judge says, " If the property might consistently with the will be applied to other,...trust is too indefinite for the court to execute" ( p). Thus in Coxe \. Sattet (9), where a testator " authorized and empowered" his trustees, to continue... | |
| Roper Stote Donnison Roper, Henry Hopley White - 1847 - 1000 페이지
...to say, that the property must not be applied to purposes, however benevolent, unless they also came within the technical denomination of charitable purposes...I should not entertain any doubt on the question." Again, in the more recent case of Ommanney v. Butcher (k), Buekeridge Ball Ackworth, after giving various... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1874 - 664 페이지
...whether he is bound so to apply it." And in James v. Allen, 3 Mer., 17, he says further: "If the property might, consistently with the will, be applied to other...trust is too indefinite for the court to execute."— See also Ellis v. Selby, 1 Myl. & C., ATIOKKRY GlUBBAL t> . 8 OVLB . If the ambiguity involves the... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1852 - 718 페이지
...Morice (a) \ Moore.s PCC p. 293. 1851. M»riec v. The Bishop of Durkam (a); and if the property iright, consistently with the will, be applied to other than strictly charitable purposes, the trust i;< too indefinite for the Court to execute ; James v. Allen (A). The cases of gifts to a country,... | |
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1870 - 628 페이지
...benevolence is also an object of his charity." The ground of the decision was, that as the bequest could, consistently with the will, be applied to other than strictly charitable purposes, the court could not execute the trust. In Williams v. Kerskaw, 5 Clark $ Fin. Ill, note, the devise was... | |
| 1916 - 1326 페이지
..." ; and another observation of the same learned Judge in James v. Atten(5) : " If it [the property] might consistently with the " will be applied to other...trust is too indefinite for the Court to execute." I have referred to EUis v. Selby(2) because it seems to me to answer the suggestion that upon the principle... | |
| |