ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub

THE

Central Law Journal

ALEXANDER H. ROBBINS, Editor

VOLUME 90
JANUARY-JUNE, 1920

CENTRAL LAW JOURNAL COMPANY,

ST. LOUIS, MO.

1920.

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1920, by CENTRAL LAW JOURNAL COMPANY,

In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.

PRINTED BY CENTRAL LAW JOURNAL COMPANY.

This list includes only those cases commented upon editorially or in our Notes of Important
Decisions, or in full annotated. The abbreviation Ed., indicates editorially-R. D., cases com-

mented upon in our Notes of Important Decisions, and ann. case, annotated case.

[blocks in formation]

Columbus Ry., P. & L. Co. v. City of Columbus

(U. S. S. C.), Right of Public Service Com-

pany to be Released from Service Con-

tracts, Notwithstanding Specific Grant by

Legislature to Make Them and Lack of Mu-
tuality, Ed. 149.

Conaway v. Pepper (Del.), The Recovery of the
Value of Stolen Property by Action of As-
sumpsit, R. D. 208.

Congregational Sunday School & Publishing

Society v. Board of Review (Ill.), Exemp-
tion from Taxation of Charities Engaged in
Selling Merchandise for Profit, R. D. 74.

Dakota National Bank v. Brodie (N. D.), Gar-

nishment Agent of Debtor, ann. case, 358.

Dougherty v. Salt (N. Y.), Gift-Promissory

Note of Testator, ann. case, 86.

Estate of P. D. Beckwith v. Commissioner of
Patents (U. S. S. C.), Trade-Marks Con-
sisting in Part Descriptive Words May
be Registered When Accompanied by Dis-

claimer, R. D. 441.

Foulke v. New York Consolidated Railway Co.
(N. Y.), Is a Street Car Passenger Guilty
of Larceny for Refusing to Give Up to the
Railroad Company a Package Found on the
Car, R. D. 332.

Granger v. Luther (S. D.), Constitutionality of
Moratorium Laws, R. D. 405.

Griffin v. Hustis (Mass.), Negligence-Imput-
ability, ann. case, 160.

Hammerschlag Mfg. Co. v. Importers and Trad-
ers National Bank (U. S. C. C. A.), Liabil-
ity of Bank for Failing to Detect Forgeries
When Depositor Does Not Verify Bank
Statement, Ed. 313.

Hancock v. Davis, et al. (N. C.), Husband and
Wife Adverse Possession, ann. case, 342.

Henderson et al. v. Fielder (Ky.), Statute of

Limitations-Disability of Infancy, ann.

Hoefeld v. Ozello (Ill.), Is a Lease to Saloon
Keeper Void Which Provides for Termina-
tion if Sunday Laws are Enforced, R. D.
96.

Holland v. Tjosevig (Wash.), Bills and Notes
-Statute of Limitations, ann. case, 215.

Howell v. Howell et al. (Tenn.), Fraudulent

Conveyances-Bulk Sales Act, ann. case, 27.

Ingersoll & Bro. v. Hahne & Co. (N. J.), Pro-

tecting Trade Name and Good Will in Pre-

vention of Price Cutting in Resales, R. D.

151.

Ingersoll & Bro. v. Hahne & Co. (N. J.), Re-

strictions Upon Resale of an Article to

Prevent Price Cutting, R. D. 282.

In re Dressler Producing Corporation (U. S. C.
C. A.), Is an Order of a Court of Bank-
ruptcy, Denying a Motion to Dismiss a Pe-
tition Reviewable by an Appeal or a Peti-
tion to Revise, R. D. 296.

In re Grilli (N. Y.), Are Women by Reason of

Being Voters Entitled to Sit on the Jury,

Ed. 205.

[blocks in formation]

King v. City of Owensboro (Ky.), Criminal

Law-Coercion of Husband, ann. case, 287.

Kornegay v. Price (N. C.), Right of Husband
to Acquire Property by Adverse Possession
as Against His Wife, R. D. 57.
Kuhn v. Ohio Loan & Trust Co. (Ohio), Mort-
gages-Future Advances, ann. case, 411.

Leland v. Order of United Commercial Travelers

(Mass.), Accident Accelerating Death Not

Sole Proximate Cause Thereof, R. D. 133.

Lemmon v. McElroy (S. C.), Does the Term
"Family" in a Will Include a Wife, R. D.
207.

Los Angeles Inv. Co. v. Gary et ux. (Cal.), Deeds
-Condition Subsequent, ann. case, 232.

Louisville & Nashville Ry. Co. v. Tally (Ala.),

Is the Judgment of a Federal Court a Do-

mestic Judgment, R. D. 152.

Maguire v. Trefry (U. S. S. C.), Constitutionality
of Tax on Incomes from Securities Held in
Trust Outside the State, Ed. 439.

Mauney v. Millar (Ark.), Libel and Slander-
Privilege, ann. case, 447.

Maxwell v. Springfield Fire Ins. Co. (Ind.), Mak-

ing a Contract for Insurance Companies in

the Interest of the Insured, R. D. 225.

McAleenan v. Massachusetts Bonding Company

(N. Y.), Insurance-Failure to Take Appeal,

ann. case, 306.

McCarton V. Belfast Harbour Commissioners

(English), The Use of Precedent and the

Need for Codification, Ed. 386.

Mogle v. A. W. Scott et al. (Minn.), Master and
Servant-Limiting Agency, ann. case, 103.
Mueller v. Klingman (Ind.), Assault and In-
jury Inflicted by Fellow Workman in a
Quarrel Within Workmen's Compensation
Act, R. D. 151.

Muller v. Weiss (N. J.), Specific Performance
Where There Has Been Material Misrepre-
sentation, R. D. 352.

National Surety Co. v. City of Atlanta (Ga.),
Contracts-Mutuality, ann. case, 323.

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »