Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1912 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U.S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
2 ÆäÀÌÁö
... interference as originally declared also involved the party Hermsdorf ; but the Primary Examiner dissolved the interference as far as Hermsdorf was concerned as to count 2 , on the ground that he was not entitled to make a claim ...
... interference as originally declared also involved the party Hermsdorf ; but the Primary Examiner dissolved the interference as far as Hermsdorf was concerned as to count 2 , on the ground that he was not entitled to make a claim ...
11 ÆäÀÌÁö
... INTERFERENCE- " ARKOMA " - " ARMONA . " 39 99 Held that an interference in fact exists between the words " Arkoma and " Armona used as trade - marks for goods of the same descriptive properties . 2. SAME - SAME - MOTION TO DISSOLVE ...
... INTERFERENCE- " ARKOMA " - " ARMONA . " 39 99 Held that an interference in fact exists between the words " Arkoma and " Armona used as trade - marks for goods of the same descriptive properties . 2. SAME - SAME - MOTION TO DISSOLVE ...
24 ÆäÀÌÁö
... interference on the ground that the issue was not patentable in view of the prior art . This motion was denied by the Primary Examiner on November 17 , 1910 . On November 22 , 1910 , the Examiner of Interferences , in view of the ...
... interference on the ground that the issue was not patentable in view of the prior art . This motion was denied by the Primary Examiner on November 17 , 1910 . On November 22 , 1910 , the Examiner of Interferences , in view of the ...
27 ÆäÀÌÁö
... interference was transmitted to the Examiner for the purpose of adding new parties and that this notice was promulgated subse- quent to the promulgation of a notice for the hearing on a motion for dissolution . Under these circumstances ...
... interference was transmitted to the Examiner for the purpose of adding new parties and that this notice was promulgated subse- quent to the promulgation of a notice for the hearing on a motion for dissolution . Under these circumstances ...
28 ÆäÀÌÁö
... interference and that all the questions which might be raised in this interference may be decided in the opposition . It is therefore contended that the interference proceed- ing should be suspended pending the determination of the ...
... interference and that all the questions which might be raised in this interference may be decided in the opposition . It is therefore contended that the interference proceed- ing should be suspended pending the determination of the ...
±âŸ ÃâÆǺ» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
abandoned acetanilid action affirmed alleged amendment appellant's appellee applicant's application for patent assignment attorney awarding priority cation circuit court cited claims combination Commissioner of Patents Company connection construction contained contention Court of Appeals Decided decision described descriptive properties device disclosed disclosure District of Columbia divisional application drawings Electric entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiner of Trade-Marks Examiners-in-Chief fact field-magnet filed final rejection follows fraud Grande Chartreuse granted ground Heany Heany's infringement interference proceeding invention in issue inventor involved jurisdiction labels Letters Patent liqueur machine manufacture mark material means Messrs motion to dissolve motor operation opinion original party Patent Office petition present Primary Examiner prior art priority of invention proceeding prosecution question reason record reduction to practice references refused registration reissue res adjudicata Revised Statutes Rule shown specification statement sufficient testimony therein thereof tion Trade-Mark Act tribunals word
Àαâ Àο뱸
495 ÆäÀÌÁö - Whenever any patent is inoperative or invalid, by reason of a defective or insufficient specification, or by reason of the patentee claiming as his own invention or discovery more than he had a right to claim as new...
520 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same ; and in...
269 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... which so nearly resemble a registered or known trade-mark owned and in use by another, and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties, as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers...
569 ÆäÀÌÁö - If the contents of the package as originally put up shall have been removed, in whole or in part, and other contents shall have been placed in such package...
261 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... any part thereof, as the facts in the case may appear. And such adjudication, if it be in favor of the right of the applicant, shall authorize the commissioner to issue such patent on the applicant filing in the Patent Office a copy of the adjudication and otherwise complying with the requirements of law.
574 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... one dollar for every sheet of the same found in his possession, either printing, printed, copied, published, imported, or exposed for sale...
568 ÆäÀÌÁö - misbranded,' as used herein, shall apply to all drugs, or articles of food, or articles which enter into the composition of food, the package or label of which shall bear any statement, design, or device regarding such article or the ingredients or substances contained therein which shall be false or misleading in any particular...
537 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... the judgments or decrees of the circuit courts of appeals shall be final in all cases in which the jurisdiction is dependent entirely upon the opposite parties to the suit or controversy, being aliens and citizens of the United States or citizens of different States...
203 ÆäÀÌÁö - Any person who believes he would be damaged by the registration of a mark may oppose the same by filing notice of opposition...
261 ÆäÀÌÁö - And such adjudication, if it be in favor of the right of the applicant, shall authorize the commissioner to issue such patent on the applicant filing in the Patent Office a copy of the adjudication and otherwise complying with the requirements of "law. In all cases where there is no opposing party a copy of the bill shall be served on the commissioner; and all the expenses of the proceedings shall be paid by the applicant, whether the final decision is in his favor or not.