Pay to C. D., if he retires my promissory note to him for £100, dated 7th July, 1883. Pay to C. D. on delivery to me of 100 quarters of wheat ex Berlin, on or before 10th August, 1883. INDORSEMENT LIMITING OR NEGATIVING LIABILITY. Pay to C. D. or order. A. B., without recourse (or without recourse except to the extent of £10). PROTEST OF A BILL FOR NON-PAYMENT. At Glasgow, the Thirtieth day of December, (Prefix copy of the bill and indorsements.) The principal bill above copied was, At Number One hundred and Three Street, Glasgow, presented on said date, and payment thereof was demanded by me, Notary Public subscribing, to which demand J. K., a partner of, and on behalf of, the said firm, made answer (here state answer if any) (or the fact that the drawee or acceptor could not be found); and the said bill was thereupon duly protested by me, Notary Public subscribing, at the request of X. Y., holder of the said bill, for non-payment of its contents, against the said G. H. & Co. (if they have accepted), acceptors thereof, and the drawer and indorsers thereof jointly and severally for the amount of the said bill, interest and expenses (or in the case of a foreign bill, say, for the amount of the said bill, re-exchange and interest thereon), as accords, in presence of B. M. and C. N., clerks to me Notary Public, witnesses specially called to the premises. B. M., witness. C. N., witness. (Veritas) R. S., N.P. PROTEST OF A BILL FOR NON-ACCEPTANCE. At Edinburgh, the Tenth day of December, Eighteen hundred and eighty-two years. (Prefix copy of the bill and indorsements.) Street, The principal bill above copied was presented to C. D., the drawee of said bill, within his office, No. Edinburgh, by me, Notary Public subscribing, and acceptance thereof was demanded by me, and refused by the said C. D., who gave the answer (here state the answer if any), (or, who gave no answer or who could not be found, as the case may be), whereupon the said bill was duly protested by me for non-acceptance at the request of X. Y., the holder thereof, against the drawer and indorsers thereof jointly and severally for the amount of the said bill, interest and expenses (or in the case of a foreign bill, say, for the amount of the said bill, re-exchange and interest thereon), as accords, in presence of B. M. and C. N., both clerks to me, Notary Public. B. M., witness. C. N., witness. (Veritas) D. H., N.P. PROTEST OF SAME BILL FOR NON-PAYMENT. Which day the said bill was duly presented by me, Notary Public subscribing, at No. Street, Edinburgh (or other place of payment), and payment thereof was duly demanded by me and refused by the said C. D., who gave answer (here state the answer if any, or that no person was found at said place of payment), whereupon the said bill was duly protested by me for non-payment (and as in preceding form). ACT OF HONOUR. Thereafter, the same day, in presence of me, Notary Public, appeared H. F., merchant in Edinburgh, who offered to pay the contents of said bill to the said X. Y., the holder thereof, for honour and on account of J. K., indorser of the same, and having paid the same accordingly, he protested that said drawer (and acceptors, if the bill has been accepted) and indorsers prior to the said X. Y. and the said J. K. should remain liable, jointly and severally, to him in like manner as they had been to the said holder. In presence of (as in preceding form). at, has been dishonoured by non-payment (or non-accept ance), and that you are held responsible therefor. LIST OF AUTHORITIES CITED IN SIDE-NOTES TO THE BILL AS INTRODUCED INTO PARLIAMENT. Section. 3. Griffin v. Weatherby, L. R. 3, Q. B. 753. 4. 19 & 20 Vict. c. 97, § 7. 5. Houldsworth v. Hunter, 10 B. and C. 449. Miller v. Thomson, 3 M. and G. R. 576. 8. Smith v. M'Clure, 5 East. 476. 9. Sanderson v. Piper, 5 Bing., N. C. 425. 10. 34 & 35 Vict. c. 74. Aldons v. Cornwall, L. R. 3, Q. B. 573. Mutford v. Walcott, 1 Ld. Raym. 514. 11. Coleman v. Cook, Willes, 393. 13. Anderston v. Weston, 6 Bing., N. C. 301. Gatty v. Fry, 2 Ex. Div. 265. 14. Campbell v. French, 6 T. R. 200. 17. 19 & 20 Vict. c. 97, § 6. 41 & 42 Vict. c. 13, § 1. Russel v. Philips, 14 Q. B. 91. Owen v. Von Ulster, 10 C. B. 318. 18. Exp. Swan, L. J., C. P. 124. Christie v. Peart, 7 M. and W. 491. 19. 1 & 2 Geo. IV. c. 78, § 1. L. & S. W. Bank v. Wentworth, 5 Ex. Div. 96. Section. 21. Abrey v. Crux, L. R. 5, C. P. 42. 22. Bateman v. Mid-Wales Railway, L. R. 1, C. P. 499. Lebel v. Tucker, 8 B. and S. 833. Smith v. Johnston, 3 H. and N. 222. 23. Fenn v. Harrison, 3 T. R. 761. Lindus v. Bradwell, 5 C. B. 591. 24. Roberts v. Tucker, 16 Q. B. 560. 25. Attwood v. Mannings, 7 B. and C. 28. 27. Currie v. Misa, L. R. 10, Ex. 153. Attenborough v. Clarke, 27 L. J., Ex. 128. 28. Oriental Corporation v. Overend, L. R. 7, Ch. 146. Bechevaise v. Lewis, L. R. 7, C. P. 377. 29. May v. Chapman, 16 M. and W. 361. 30. Jones v. Gordon, 2 Ap. Cases, 627. 31. Whister v. Foster, 14 C. B., N. S. 258. Watkins v. Maule, 2 Jac. and W. 237. 32. Hawkins v. Cardy, 1Ld. Raym. 360. 34. Hirschfield v. Smith, L. R. 1, C. P. 340. 35. Sigurney v. Lloyd, 5 Bing. 525. 36. Callow v. Laurence, 3 M. and S. 97. 37. Norris v. Walker, 15 Q. B. 589. Section. 40. Ramchurn v. Radakissen, 9 Moore, P. C. 46. 41. Smith v. N. S. Wales Bank, 8 Moore, P. C. N. S. 461. Smith v. Bellamy, 2 Stark, 223. 42. Van Dieman's Land Bank v. Victoria Bank, L. R. 3, P. C. 542. 44. Sebag v. Abithol, 4 M. and S. 466. 48. Dunn v. A. Keefe, 5 M. and S. 282. 49. Chapman v. Keane, 3 A. and E. 193. Harrisson v. Ruscoe, 15 M. and W. 235. Maxwell v. Braim, 10 L. T., N. S. 381. Ex. p. Baker, 4 Ch. Div. 795. Smith v. Mullet, 2 Camp. 208. Hawkes v. Salter, 4 Bing. 715. Clode v. Bayley, 12 M. and W. 51. 50. Bickerdyke v. Bollman, 2 Smith, L. C. and notes. Turner v. Sanson, 2 Q. B., Div. 22. 51. 2 & 3 Will. IV. c. 98. Legge v. Thorpe, 12 East. 171. 52. Rowe v. Young, 2 Bligh., H. D. 467. Smith v. Vertue, 30 L. J., C. P. 59. Treacher v. Hinton, 4 B. and Ald. 413. Crowe v. Clay, 9 Ex. 604. 53. Goodwin v. Roberts, L. R. 10, Ex. 351. Hopkinson v. Foster, L. R. 19, Eq. 74. 18 & 19 Vict. c. 67, § 6. 54. Garland v. Jacomb, L. R. 8, Ex.216. 56. Ex. p. Yates, 2 D. C. G. and J. 191. 57. 18 & 19 Vict. c. 67, § 5. Re Gen. South American Co. 7 Ch. Keene v. Keene, 3 C. B., N. S. 144. Section. 58. Fenn v. Harrison, 3 T. R. 757. Gompertz v. Bartlett, 23 L. J., C. P. 65. 59. Jones v. Broadhurt, 9 C. B. 173. 60. 16 & 17 Vict. c. 59, § 19. Charles v. Blackwell, 2 C. P., Div. 151. 62. Harmer v. Steele, 4 Ex. 1. Foster v. Dawber, 6 Ex. 839. 63. Ingham v. Primrose, 7 C. B., N. S. 82. Warwick v. Rogers, 5 M. and Gr. 340. 64. Burchfield v. Moore, 23 L. J., Q. B. 261. Bradley v. Bardsley, 14 M. and W. Hamelin v. Bruck, 9 Q. B. 306. 151. 66. Hoare v. Cazenove, 16 East. 394. 67. 6 & 7 Will. IV. c. 58. 69. 9 & 10 Will. III. c. 17, § 3. Rhodes v. Morse, 14 Jur. 800. 70. 17 & 18 Vict. c. 125, § 88. 19 & 20 Vict. c. 102, § 90. 71. Société Générale v. Metropolitan Bank, 27 L. T, N. S. 854. Holdsworth v. Hunter, 10 B. and C. 449. 72. Byles, 12th edit. 403. Lebel v. Tucker, L. R. 3, Q. B. 77. 514. Div. Hirschfield v. Smith, L. R. 1, C. P. 353. 73. Hopkinson v. Forster, L. R. 19, Eq. 74. 74. Laws v. Rand, 27 L. J., C. P. 76. Alexander v. Burchifield, 7 M. and Gr. 1061. Heywood v. Pickering, L. R. 9, |