...US-A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Fund, 467 US 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778 (1984), held that a reviewing court must first determine "whether Congress has directly...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress." 467 US at 842-43, 104 S.Ct. at 2781. The Supreme Court went on to find that "[i]f, however, the court...

...Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 US 837 (1984). The standard of review includes determining first whether "Congress has directly spoken to the precise...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress." Chevron, 467 at 842—43. If the congressional intent, as expressed in the statute, is ambiguous or...

...Natural Resources Defense Council. 467 US 837 (1984). The standard of review includes determining first whether "Congress has directly spoken to the precise...court, as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambigContinued In the instant case, appellant requested in 1978 a lump-sum payment. He was advised,...

...the statute which it administers, it is confronted with two questions. First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. If, however, the court determines Congress has not directly addressed the precise question at issue,...

...interpretation analysis in situations such as this. That decision states: [fjirst, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. ... if the statute is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue, the question for the...

...principle of statutory construction that when congressional intent, as reflected in the statutory language, is clear "that is the end of the matter; for the court,...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress." Chevron USA v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 467 US 837, 842-43 (1985). Here, the plain language of Section...

...challenges to an agency's interpretation of its governing statute is well established: We first ask "whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress." Chevron USA Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 US 837, 842-843, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 2781,...

...the statute which it administers, it is confronted with two questions. First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. If, however, the court determines Congress has not directly addressed the precise question at issue,...

...the statute which it administers, it is confronted with two questions. First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. If, however, the court determines Congress has not directly addressed the precise question at issue,...

...description of REEP in the notice appears mainly at 51 Fed. Reg. 34428, 34431-35 (September 26, 1986). - 13 to the precise question at issue. If the intent of...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. If, however, the court determines Congress has not directly addressed the precise question at issue,...