fair charge for such services, and which additional amount the customers of the respondent, and eventually the public, must pay. CONCLUSION. The practices of the said respondent, under the conditions and circumstances described in the foregoing findings, are unfair methods of competition in interstate and foreign commerce and constitute a violation of the act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes.' ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST. This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Commission upon the complaint of the Commission, the answer of the respondent, and an agreed statement of facts, and the Commission having made its findings as to the facts with its conclusion that the respondent has violated the provisions of the act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes,' It is ordered, That the respondent, the Orleans Iron Works (Inc.), and its officers, directors, agents, servants, and employees cease and desist from directly or indirectly giving to captains and other officers and employees of vessels, valuable gifts, cash commissions, and gratuities as an inducement to have the ships operated by them for the owners thereof repaired and repair parts for same furnished by the respondent. It is further ordered, That the respondent, within 60 days after the date of service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with the order to cease and desist herein before set forth. 74636-22- -28 Coal; capitalstock. 21 567 22 338 123 Acme Coal Mining Misbranding. Stimulation of competitor's trade name. Answer and trial. Answer and Answer and Bogus independents; enticing competitors' em- Dismissed and discontinued "for the reason Practice charged not a practice of respondent in branch house. Charge not sustained. No reasons assigned. Dismissed without prejudice; no reasons as- Answer and No reasons assigned. 1 Except where otherwise stated, the matter charged is charged as a violation of sec. 5 of the Federal Trade Commission act. The language of the complaint reads in part: "A system of giving cumulative rebates in the sale of its products whereby purchasers of its products obtain at the end of each calendar year, or at the end of a definite period, certain rebates or discounts based and estimated upon the aggregate of the separate purchases made by such dealers during the calendar year or such fixed period." |