 What facts does my hon. friend produce in support of his opinion? One fact only; and that a fact which has absolutely nothing to do with the question. The effect of this Reform, he tells us, would be to make the House of Commons all-powerful. It was all-powerful...  Speeches - 86 페이지저자: Thomas Babington Macaulay Baron Macaulay - 1853전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | Thomas Babington Macaulay Baron Macaulay - 1853 - 446 페이지
...institutions are uusuited to this country. Monarchy and aristocracy, valuable and useful as I think them, arc still valuable and useful as means, and not as ends....was all-powerful once before, in the beginning of 1 649. Then it cut off the head of the King, and abolished the House of Peers. Therefore, if this reform... | |
 | Thomas Babington Macaulay Baron Macaulay - 1854 - 566 페이지
...PARLIAMENTARY REFORM. 13 prerogatives and the constitutional rights of the Peers. What facts does my honorable friend produce in support of his opinion? One fact...be to make the House of Commons allpowerful. It was allpOAverful once before, in the beginning of 1649. Then it cut off the head of the King, and abolished... | |
 | Thomas Babington Macaulay Baron Macaulay - 1854 - 582 페이지
...uphold the Royal prerogatives and the constitutional rights of the Peers. AVhat facts does my honorable friend produce in support of his opinion? One fact...he tells us, would be to make the House of Commons all powerful. It was allpowerful once before, in the beginning of 1649. Then it cut off the head of... | |
 | Thomas Babington Macaulay Baron Macaulay - 1860 - 592 페이지
...uphold the Royal prerogatives and the constitutional rights of the Peers. What facts does my honorable friend produce in support of his opinion ? One fact...King, and abolished the House of Peers. Therefore, if it again has the supreme power, it will act in the same manner. Now, Sir, it was not the House of Commons... | |
 | Thomas Babington baron Macaulay - 1866 - 738 페이지
...uphold the Eoyal prerogatives and the constitutional rights of the Peers. What facts does my honorable friend produce in support of his opinion? One fact...King, and abolished the House of Peers. Therefore, if it again has the supreme power, it will act in the same manner. Now, Sir, it was not the House of Commons... | |
 | Thomas Babington Macaulay (baron [speeches]) - 1866 - 294 페이지
...uphold the Royal prerogatives and the constitutional rights of the Peers. What facts does my honorable friend produce in support of his opinion? One fact...absolutely nothing to do 'with the question. The effect of tills Reform, he tells us, would be to make the House of Commons allpowerful. It was allpowerful once... | |
 | Thomas Babington Macaulay Baron Macaulay - 1871 - 760 페이지
...uphold the Royal prerogatives and the constitutional rights of the Peers. What facts does my honorable friend produce in support, of his opinion ? One fact...King, and abolished the House of Peers. Therefore, if it again has the supreme power, it will act in the same manner. Now, Sir, it was not the House of Commons... | |
 | Thomas Babington Macaulay Baron Macaulay - 1875 - 752 페이지
...uphold the Eoyal prerogatives and the constitutional rights of the Peers. What facts does my honorable friend produce in support of his opinion ? One fact...King, and abolished the House of Peers. Therefore, if it again has the supreme power, it will act in the same manner. Now, Sir, it was not the House of Commons... | |
 | Thomas Babington Macaulay Baron Macaulay - 1880 - 498 페이지
...uphold the Royal prerogatives and the constitutional righl^ of the Peers. What facts does my honorable friend produce in support of his opinion ? One fact...King, and abolished the House of Peers. Therefore, if it again has the supreme power, it will act in the same manner. Now, Sir, it was not the House of Commons... | |
 | Thomas Babington Macaulay Baron Macaulay - 1880 - 588 페이지
...uphold the Royal prerogatives and the constitutional rights of the Peers. What facts does my honorable friend produce in support of his opinion ? One fact...King, and abolished the House of Peers. Therefore, if it again has the supreme power, it will act in the same manner. Now, sir, it was not the House of Commons... | |
| |
