| Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Sir Edward Hyde East - 1806 - 376 페이지
...wmld deteimineon the 1 j'th ol February, the 5A of April, and the 12th of May, in the year 1798; and the defendant was in possession of the premises at the time of bringing the ejectment. Tht questions for the opinion of the Court were, 1st, Whether the Irase of... | |
| sir William Blackstone - 1825 - 568 페이지
...is altered by inserting the name of George (3) The defendant is now also obliged to confess his own possession of the premises at the time of the service of the declaration. Unless he was at that time the tenant in possession, the action was brought against the wrong person,... | |
| 1871 - 982 페이지
...plaintiff thereupon became entitled to dower in or out of the premises so purchased by the defendant. The defendant was in possession of the premises at the time of Anderson's death, and the plaintiff alleged that she had requested him to assign or secure to her dower... | |
| Joseph Rockwell Swan - 1837 - 614 페이지
...his improvements .upon being turned out; he could not. The plaintiff, in order to recover, must show, that the defendant was in possession of the premises, at the time the judgment was rendered(n). (C) Of the proceedings on the trial when the defendant is a settler,... | |
| Richard Holmes Coote - 1840 - 838 페이지
...shall specify in the consent rule for what premises he intends to defend, and shall confess that he was in possession of the premises at the time of the service of the declaration, RG 1 Geo. IV. KB 4 B. 4 A. 196. RG 1 & 2 Geo. IV. CP 2 B. & B. 470. R. G : Geo. IV. Excheq. 9 Price.... | |
| Vermont. Supreme Court - 1846 - 798 페이지
...conveyed the same to the plaintiff, by deed dated May 18, 1841 ; and it appeared that the defendants were in possession of the premises at the time of the service of this writ. The trial commenced on Monday, the 29th day of May, 1843, and when the evidence on the part... | |
| Thomas Chitty - 1847 - 1070 페이지
...(b). If the defendant do not appear, and confess lease, entry, and ouster, and that he or his tenant was in possession of the premises at the time of the service of the declaration, the defendant (and his attorney, if he he within the rule) must be called to confess the same. The... | |
| Charles Broadbelt Claydon - 1847 - 524 페이지
...agrees to plead the general issue, and at the trial to confess lease, entry and ouster, and that he was in possession of the premises at the time of the service of the declaration in ejectment ; and for the purpose of preventing tenants from allowing recoveries to be obtained fraudulently... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1920 - 808 페이지
...landlord, and was permitted to assert but failed to show a paramount title, the court said : "It appears that the defendant was in possession of the premises at the time when the verbal lease was 205— Mich.— 5. made, and he relies upon the rule in Tewksbury v. Magraff,... | |
| Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1858 - 710 페이지
...sheriff's sale, on the 9th of May, 1854. It was proved on the trial, on the part of the plaintiff, that the defendant was in possession of the premises at the time the transcript of the judgment was filed and docketed, and that he continued in possession from that... | |
| |