*PAGE Egerton v. Mathews.... 1.6 East 307.... .3 Bos. & Pull. 181. Ellis v. Marshall.. 2 Mass. 277.. Elmore v. Stone.. .1 Taunt. 458. Emmerson v. Heelis. .2 Taunt. 38.... Empson v. Bathurst. Wincb. 20, 50. Estrella, The... .4 Wheat. 298. Exchange, The... .7 Cr. 116... Eyre v. Countess of Shaftesbury..2 P. Wms. 119. ...91-2, 94 .264, 271, 295 .560, 593, 709 90 97 253 502 . 70, 395 . 4, 11, 51 F ..app. 16 6 Cr. 89..... Falkland v. Bertie... ..2 Vern. 342...... 12, 511, app. 19 Fama, The.... .5 Rob. 106 253 Farmers' and Mechanics' Bank v. Smith .3 S. & R. 63. . 136, 212 Fawell v. IIeelis. .Ambl. 724. 270, 295 Fielding v. Bond. .2 Vern. 230. Fletcher v. Peck.. ..259, 267, 590, 592, 606-8, 655, 682 Flood's Case... Hob. 136. Foltina, The... 1 Dods. 450. 253 Forth v. Stanton. 1 Saund. 211. 684 Fortuna, The.. . 1 Dods. 284 60 Fowler v. Freeman. 2 Ves. 351. Franklin v. Esgood. .2 Johns. Cas. 1.. 699 Frier v. Peacock. 1 Vern. 225, Cas. temp. Finch 245..11, 51b, app. 12 Frost v. Beekman. ...1 Johns. Ch. 288, 302.....264, 273, 485. app. 14 94 G Garcia v. Lawson. 4 Ves. jr. 433 .. ..app. 18 .1 Johns. Ch. 308. .264, 293 3 Wheat. 324.. 65 1 Wheat. 408. 84 1 Dall. 366.. 212 .2 Eq. Cas. Abr. 682. 293 3 Dall. 6, 16. 66 .3 W. C. C. 313. .129, 134, 212 5 Co. 60. 484 2 Ves. & B. 306. .264, 271, 296–7 2 Mass. 364. 605 8 Cr. 229, 245. ..222, 267 1 Ves. 462, 472...51k, 565–6, 571, 622, 675, app. 8 3 Dall. 370.. 212 .3 M. & S. 178... 89 Greenough v. Emory.. : Hamersley v. Lambert. Hamilton v. Cutts.... Hannay v. Jacobs. Harden v. Fisher. Harris v. Mandeville. Harrison v.. Harrison.. Harrison v. Sterry. Hassels , . Simpson. Hatton vi Gray Hayman v. Neal.. Heath v. Rose.. Heister v. Fortner.. Hicks v. Brown.. Hildreth v. Sands. Hilliard v. Greenleaf. Hinde v. Whitehouse. Hodgson v. Hutchinson. Holmes v. Lansing.. Hughes v. Kearney. Huguenin v. Baseley.. Hunt v. Adamson. H *PAGB 2 Johns. Ch. 511..... 212 1 Mass. 353.. 232 MS..... 135 1 Wheat. 300. 464 .2 Dall. 256.. 212 8 Ves. 185.. 95; .5 Cr. 289, 301.. 120-1 1 Doug. 92. 140 .2 Johns. Ch. 164. 94 .2 Camp. 337. 96 .12 Johns. 140.... 470 2 Binn. 40... 478 ..12 Johns. 142. 212 2 Johns. Ch. 35. 474 .5 Binn. 336. 212 7 East 558. 90, 96–7 .5 Vin. 522.. 92 3 Johns. Cas. 73.... .134, 140, 196 1 Sch. & Lef. 132..264, 271, 293, 295, 297 .14 Ves. 288. 474 5 Mass. 358 91 .1 Johns. Cas. 22. 2 Johns. Cas. 29. 4 T. R. 436... Hob. 136 93 707 74 app. 13 *PAGD Kent v. Huskinson .3 Bos. & Pul. 233.. 90 King v. Askew .4 Burr. 2200. .593, 708 King v. Bury... .1 Ld. Raym. 5 672 King v. Miller.... 6 T. R. 277.. 594 King v. Pasmore.. .3 T. R. 244...560, 593–4, 604, 613, 658, 663, 675, 688, 707 King v. St. Catherine's Hall. ....4 T. R: 233. ..567, 703 King v. Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge.. 3 Burr. 1656.... :560, 592, 707 Kipp v. Bingham... .6 Johns. 158. 232 Kirkby Ravensworth ...51k, 676, app. 8 Knight v. Crockford... .1 Esp. 190.... 95 ....16 Ves. 304..... . • app. 15 McDonough v. The Mary Ford...3 Dall. 188, 198.... 68 Mackintosh v. Townsend. 16 Ves. 330. .51n, app. 18 Mackreth v. Symmons 15 Ves. 329. 263-4, 275, 292-3-4 Man v. Ballet.., .1 Vern. 42. Martin v. Hunter.. 1 Wheat. 304. 314 Martindale v. Martin. Cro. Eliz. 288. 51d Meres v. Ansell.. 3 Wils. 275. 93 Merrit v. Clason. .12 Johns. 102, . 92, 96 Mertins v. Jolliffe. . Ambl. 311. 263 Middleton's Case: .Moore 889. 5lg Millar v. Hall.. i Dall. 229. 212 Mills v. Farmer. .1 Meriv. 55, 94.51a, 51b, 511, 511, app. 4, 8, 10–13, 17, 20 Mines v. Stacey. .1 Holt 153. 91 Mogg v. Hodges .2 Ves. 52.... Moggridge v. Thackwell.. .7 Ves. 36, 69, 1 Id. 464.. .4, 8, 10, 21, 45, 46, 51a, 51b, 51h, 511, 51m, app. 4, 8, 10, 11, 15, 18, 19, 20, 22 Monell v. Lawson! .2 Eq. Cas. Abr. 167 13, 51m Moodie v. The Alfred... .3 Dall. 307. 69 Moodie ». The Phæbe Anne. 3 Dall. 319. 69 Moore v. Hart ..., 1 Vern. 110 92 Morice v. Bishop of Durham. ...9 Ves. 399, 10 Id. -522....7, 8, 9, 24, 45, 512 51b, app. 6, 7 .app. 16 Paice v. Archbishop of Canterbury.14 Ves. 364, 372.51b, 510, 511,51m, app. 20 Parker v. Rule.... 9 Cr. 64... 83 Parkhurst v. Van Cortlandt. 1 Johns. Ch. 273. 93 Parteriche v. Powlet. .2 Atk. 383 9.3 Partridge v. Walker. .4 Co. 116.. 51d Patton v. Easton.. .4 Wheat. 476. 234 Pawlet v. Clark. 9 Cr. 292.. . 275, 695 Penniman v. Meigs. .9 Johns. 325., 212 Philips v. Bury 2 T. R. 346..568, 571, 659, 668, 670, 674-5 Pickering v. Appleby .Com. 354. 89 Pigot v. Penrice.. .2 Eq. Cas. Abr. 191. 7, 19 Pollexfen v. Moore.. .3 Atk. 272. .264, 270 Porter's Case.. 1 Co. 22... .4, 8, 10, 23, 33, 510, 668 Porter v. Brown.. .5 East 124. 212 Powell v. Edmunds. 12 East 6.. 93 Preston v. Merceau. .2 W. Bl. 1249. 93 Prince v. Bartlett. .8 Cr. 431.. Proctor v. Moore. 1 Mass. 198. 130 . 120, 145 Raymond v. Squire.. R 700 Duke 81.. 51 .1 Dow. 50. 274 .. Comb. 316. 707 .2 T. R. 199. 676 .4 Bro. C. C. 514 93 . Moore 890.7; 18, 51b, 510, 51g, app. 12, 13 .3 Rob. 212. 5 .2 Caines 117. 94 91 app. 9 .app. 14. Samuel, The..... 63 Saunderson v. Jackson .. 2 Bos. & Pul. 236.. .85, 92, 94-5 Schneider v. Norris... 2 M. & S. 286.... 94-5 Searle v. Keeves. 2 Esp. 598... 90 Sears v. Brink... .3 Johns. 210. Seton v. Slade.. .7 Ves. 265.... 94 Simon v. Motivos. ..3 Burr. 1921. .96-7 Slingerland v. Morse. .7 Johns. 463. 86 Smart v. Prugean. 6 Ves. 567. Smith v. Brown.. 3 Binn. 201. .: 212 Smith v. Buchanan. .1 Esp. 6. 130, 212 Smith v. Smith.. .2 Johns. 235.. 212 Smith v. Stowell. 1 Ch. Cas. 195. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. Wheeler... .2 Gallis. 139.. 135, 577 St. Dunstan v. Beauchamp..... .1 Ch. Cas. 193:.. .510, 51k, app. 8 St. John's College v. Todington...1 W. Bl. 84, 1 Burr. 200...566, 668, 674 Stapp v. Lill. .1 Camp. 242.. .86, 92 Stead v. Course.. 4 Cr. 403.. 82 Stevensov. The Sandwich.. 1 Pet. Adm. 233 442 Stokes v. Moore... 1 P. Wms. 771. 95 Story v. Ld. Winsor. .2 Atk. 630. 473 Stuart v. Laird... .1 Cr. 299. 166 Sturges v. Crowninshield. 4 Wheat. 122. .331, 355, 361 Susa, The.... 2 Rob. 255... 106 Sutton Hospital Case. .10 Co. 1, 23. .10, 25, 671, 675, 694 Symonds v. Ball..... .8 T. R. 151. 85, 97 T • app. 13 Talbot v. Jansen... 3 Dall. 159...... .60, 61, 67, 71 Talver v. West. .1 Holt 175.. 90 Tauney v. Crowther. 3 Bro. C. C. 191, 318. 92 Tay v. Slaughter.. Prec. Ch. 61... Taylor v. McDonald. 2 Bibb 420.. .478, 485 Terasson's Case. ... .Cooper Bank. L. 30, app. 212 Terrett v. Taylor.. .9 Cr. 43..575,591, 606, 609, 663,695, 707 Thelusson v. Smith. .2 Wheat. 396, 424.. ..120-1, 145 Thetford School Case. .8 Co. 130. 51d Thirty Hogsheads of Sugar v. Boyle... 9 Cr. 191 253 Thomas Gibson, The.. 8 Cr. 421 101 |