Entered according to act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundred and

eighty-five,

BY W. C. LITTLE & CO..

in the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.

The March 12, 1887

THE ARGUS COMPANY,

PRINTERS AND STEREOTYPERS,

ALBANY, N. Y.

CA USES in which the decisions contained in these Reports have
been passed upon by the Court of Appeals.

Order of General Term affirmed and judgment absolute rendered for the

defendants, with costs: 97 N. Y. 230.

EMMERICH v. HEFFERAN..

Order affirmed: 97 N. Y. 619.

......

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OSWEGO v. DUNN.....
SECOND NATIONAL BANK OF OSWEGO v. DUNN..
Order of General Term reversed, and that of the Special Term affirmed,
with costs: 97 N. Y. 149.

GEORGE v. GRANT ......

Judgment affirmed: 97 N. Y. 262.

KNAPP v. CITY OF BROOKLYN...

Judgment of General Term affirmed, with costs, but since the defect in the
complaint is capable of correction the plaintiff should have leave upon pay-
ment of costs of the demurrer, including those of the appeals to the General
Term and to this court, to serve within twenty days from notice of the entry
of this judgment an amended complaint in the action: 97 N. Y. 520.

MATTER OF MEHRBACH

Order of General Term reversed, and that of Special Term affirmed, with
costs: 97 N. Y. 601.

MATTER OF SWAN...

Order reversed: 97 N. Y. 492.

PEOPLE . RYLAND

Judgment affirmed: 97 N. Y. 126.

PEOPLE EX REL. DEVOE v. KELLY

So far as the order of the county judge directs the prisoner to be remanded
to the custody of the sheriff it is right, as is also the judyment of the
General Term so far as it affirms such direction, and to that extent they
are affirmed: 97 N. Y. 212.

vi

HUN, VOL.

PAGE.

PEOPLE EX REL. LAWRENCE v. MANN...

Order of General and Special Terms reversed and writ dismissed :

97 N. Y. 530.

PEOPLE EX REL. THE MILLS WATER-WORKS COMPANY v. FORREST... 29
Judgment affirmed: 97 N. Y. 97.

548

The attention of the profession is called to the fact, that the Court of Appeals in many cases decide an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below.

The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the General Term, does not necessarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in, or dissented from, the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court.— [REP.