Atlantic Reporter, 99±ÇWest Publishing Company, 1917 |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
vii ÆäÀÌÁö
... TRIAL . 80 Vt . 501 [ 68 Ath 645 ] ; 82 Vt . 64 [ 71 Atl . 831 ] : 84 Vt . 266 [ 78 Atl . 10211 ; 86 Vt .. 426 [ 85 Atl . 904 ] ; 89 Vt . 51 [ 94 Atl . 104 ] . 1. A petition for a new trial founded on newly discovered evidence shall ...
... TRIAL . 80 Vt . 501 [ 68 Ath 645 ] ; 82 Vt . 64 [ 71 Atl . 831 ] : 84 Vt . 266 [ 78 Atl . 10211 ; 86 Vt .. 426 [ 85 Atl . 904 ] ; 89 Vt . 51 [ 94 Atl . 104 ] . 1. A petition for a new trial founded on newly discovered evidence shall ...
9 ÆäÀÌÁö
... trial on the ques- new trial , defendant prosecutes exceptions . tension line it had knowledge of the location tion of damages alone , unless plaintiff files of the petitioner's lines ; and it will be tak - remittitur , in which case ...
... trial on the ques- new trial , defendant prosecutes exceptions . tension line it had knowledge of the location tion of damages alone , unless plaintiff files of the petitioner's lines ; and it will be tak - remittitur , in which case ...
36 ÆäÀÌÁö
... trial . Motion sustained , and new trial granted . Argued before SAVAGE , C. J. , and CORN- ISH , KING , BIRD , HALEY , and PHIL- BROOK , JJ . Thomas A. Sanders and Charles E. Gurney , both of Portland , for plaintiff . Newell ...
... trial . Motion sustained , and new trial granted . Argued before SAVAGE , C. J. , and CORN- ISH , KING , BIRD , HALEY , and PHIL- BROOK , JJ . Thomas A. Sanders and Charles E. Gurney , both of Portland , for plaintiff . Newell ...
55 ÆäÀÌÁö
... TRIAL 72 - GROUNDS — VERDICT - CONTRARY TO EVIDENCE . When in the judgment of the trial court a verdict is wrong , because it fails to respond truly to the real merits of the controversy and administer substantial justice , and is ...
... TRIAL 72 - GROUNDS — VERDICT - CONTRARY TO EVIDENCE . When in the judgment of the trial court a verdict is wrong , because it fails to respond truly to the real merits of the controversy and administer substantial justice , and is ...
56 ÆäÀÌÁö
... trial 350 feet . The chauffeur of defendant's au- judge has denied defendant's motion for atomobile testified that he saw the truck new trial . To such ruling the defendant dufy standing there when even at a greater dis- excepted , as ...
... trial 350 feet . The chauffeur of defendant's au- judge has denied defendant's motion for atomobile testified that he saw the truck new trial . To such ruling the defendant dufy standing there when even at a greater dis- excepted , as ...
±âŸ ÃâÆǺ» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
action affirmed alleged amended APPEAL AND ERROR appellee applied appointment assumpsit authority bill cause Cent certiorari charge claim complainant contract contributory negligence corporation counsel Court of Chancery court of equity damages deceased declaration decree deed defendant defendant's dence election employé entitled equity evidence exceptions executors fact fendant filed held husband injury issue Jersey Jersey City judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land liability lien lumber MASTER AND SERVANT matter ment mortgage motion MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS municipality N. J. Eq N. J. Law N. J. Sup negligence Newark nonsuit Note Note.-For opinion owner parties payment person petition plaintiff proceedings question railroad reason received recover replevin residuary estate rule statement statute Streator street suit Supreme Court testator testimony thereof tiff tion town trial judge trust verdict wife witness writ
Àαâ Àο뱸
216 ÆäÀÌÁö - A person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law. That is only one of the forms of municipal law, and is no more sacred than any other. Rights of property which have been created by the common law cannot be taken away without due process ; but the law itself, as a rule of conduct, may be changed at the will, or even at the whim, of the legislature, unless prevented by constitutional limitations. Indeed, the great office of statutes is to remedy defects in the common law...
65 ÆäÀÌÁö - Municipal and other corporations and individuals invested with the privilege of taking private property for public use, shall make just compensation for property taken, injured, or destroyed by the construction or enlargement of their works, highways, or improvements, which compensation shall be paid or secured before such taking, injury, or destruction.
122 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... a body corporate and politic, in fact and in name, by the name of "The Society of the Lying-in Hospital of the City of New York...
104 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... in the absence of fraud in the transaction the judgment of the directors as to the value of the property purchased shall be conclusive...
341 ÆäÀÌÁö - It is but a decent respect due to the wisdom, the integrity, and the patriotism of the legislative body, by which any law is passed, to presume in favor of its validity, until its violation of the constitution is proved beyond all reasonable doubt.
307 ÆäÀÌÁö - July 1, 1898, which provides that "a discharge in bankruptcy shall release a bankrupt from all his provable debts...
423 ÆäÀÌÁö - While the presumption is, where one has made a will, that he did not intend to die intestate as to any part of his property...
255 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... action shall survive to the surviving plaintiff or plaintiffs, or against the surviving defendant or defendants, the writ or action shall not be thereby abated: but such death being suggested upon the record, the action shall proceed at the suit of the surviving plaintiff or plaintiffs against the surviving defendant or defendants.
7 ÆäÀÌÁö - We think it is a settled principle, growing out of the nature of well-ordered civil society, that every holder of property, however absolute and unqualified may be his title, holds it under the implied liability that his use of it may be so regulated, that it shall not be injurious to the equal enjoyment of others having an equal right to the enjoyment of their property, nor injurious to the rights of the community.
202 ÆäÀÌÁö - That, in order to give effect to the will of the people as expressed by their elected representatives, it is necessary that the power of the other House to alter or reject bills passed by this House should be so restricted by Law as to secure that within the limits of a single Parliament the final decision of the Commons shall prevail.