The Southwestern Reporter, 174권West Publishing Company, 1915 |
도서 본문에서
100개의 결과 중 1 - 5개
29 페이지
... owner of such patent , in suing to recover land lying within the exterior lines there- of , must show that the land claimed is not cov- ered by any of the exclusions mentioned ; but where a patent does not mention any exclusions from ...
... owner of such patent , in suing to recover land lying within the exterior lines there- of , must show that the land claimed is not cov- ered by any of the exclusions mentioned ; but where a patent does not mention any exclusions from ...
45 페이지
... owner testified that the mar- ket value of the tract before the taking was $ 21 , - 000 , and that the value of the remainder after the taking was $ 10,500 , an offer , made by a wit- ness for the railroad company while on the wit- ness ...
... owner testified that the mar- ket value of the tract before the taking was $ 21 , - 000 , and that the value of the remainder after the taking was $ 10,500 , an offer , made by a wit- ness for the railroad company while on the wit- ness ...
47 페이지
... owner should , in our opinion , be held to be unconstitutional . When the compensation has once been ascertained by a competent tribunal at the ex- pense of the condemning party , the law has done all for the owner which the ...
... owner should , in our opinion , be held to be unconstitutional . When the compensation has once been ascertained by a competent tribunal at the ex- pense of the condemning party , the law has done all for the owner which the ...
53 페이지
... OWNER - INJUNCTION - JOINDER OF PARTIES . Where there was an unlawful attempt to take property for a street under invalid ordi- nances , the owner , in a suit to enjoin the taking , properly joined the city and the members of the board ...
... OWNER - INJUNCTION - JOINDER OF PARTIES . Where there was an unlawful attempt to take property for a street under invalid ordi- nances , the owner , in a suit to enjoin the taking , properly joined the city and the members of the board ...
54 페이지
... owner , the owner was entitled to enjoin the city and its officers from entering on the land to convert it into a street . of said city ; that plaintiffs are the owners of the south 40 feet of lot 3 in block 24 , Pattee's addition to ...
... owner , the owner was entitled to enjoin the city and its officers from entering on the land to convert it into a street . of said city ; that plaintiffs are the owners of the south 40 feet of lot 3 in block 24 , Pattee's addition to ...
기타 출판본 - 모두 보기
자주 나오는 단어 및 구문
adverse possession affirmed alleged amount Anderson county APPEAL AND ERROR Appeal from Circuit appellant appellee authority bank bill cause of action Cent charge Circuit Court city of St claim common carrier Constitution contract contributory negligence corporation Coun CRIMINAL LAW damages deceased deed defendant defendant's demurrer Digests and Indexes district employés evidence facts fendant filed Flemingsburg held indictment injury instruction issue Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Kansas City Key-Numbered Digests land liable license lien Louis Macon County ment Missouri motion negligence Northern Rail Northern Railroad Company Note.-For ordinance owner paid Palestine pany parties payment person petition plaintiff pleaded purchase question Railway Company reason record res adjudicata roundhouses rule statute street suit Supreme Court surety testified testimony thereof tiff tion topic and KEY-NUMBER trial court verdict witness
인기 인용구
402 페이지 - An instrument is negotiated when it is transferred from one person to another in such manner as to constitute the transferee the holder thereof. If payable to bearer it is negotiated by delivery; if payable to order it is negotiated by the indorsement of the holder completed by delivery.
179 페이지 - And for the purpose of such recovery any court of bankruptcy, as hereinbefore defined, and any state court which would have had jurisdiction if bankruptcy had not intervened, shall have concurrent jurisdiction.
106 페이지 - In considering the operation of this judgment, it should be borne in mind, as stated by counsel, that there is difference between the effect of a judgment as a bar or estoppel against the prosecution of a second action upon the same claim or demand, and its effect as an estoppel in another action between the same parties upon a different claim or cause of action.
106 페이지 - But when.- the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue, or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.
403 페이지 - But for the purpose of determining whether the transferee is a holder in due course, the negotiation takes effect as of the time when the indorsement is actually made.
193 페이지 - This company shall not be liable under this policy for a greater proportion of any loss on the described property, or for loss by and expense of removal from premises endangered by fire, than the amount hereby insured shall bear to the whole insurance, whether valid or not, or by solvent or insolvent insurers, covering such property...
131 페이지 - Columbia and any of the states or territories and any foreign nation or nations shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or in case of the death of such employee to his or her personal representative...
207 페이지 - Nothing can be clearer, both upon principle and authority, than the doctrine that the liability of a surety is not to be extended, by implication, beyond the terms of his contract.
88 페이지 - No law shall be passed by the general assembly granting the right to construct and operate a street railroad within any city, town or incorporated village, without requiring the consent of the local authorities having the control of the street or highway proposed to be occupied by such street railroad.
404 페이지 - Absence or failure of consideration is matter of defense as against any person not a holder in due course; and partial failure of consideration is a defense pro tanto, whether the failure is an ascertained and liquidated amount or otherwise.