ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub

On this point a discussion took place, and it was decided, by 165 to 60, that this privilege could not be granted to her Majesty's Counsel.

Mr Brougham afterwards asked that he might be allowed to make comments on the evidence adduced without entering upon his own case, which was also refused, by a majority of 170 to 49.

Sept. 9.-Mr Brougham, when called upon, at the meeting of the House, inform ed their Lordships that he had been instructed by her Majesty to proceed in her defence with the least possible delay, understanding that, besides this course of procedure, no other alternative remained than to suffer the injurious effects of the case for the prosecution being allowed to remain for a considerable time without answer or comment. Being desired to name a precise

AUGUST.

day when her Majesty would be ready to proceed in her defence, Mr Brougham said he would ask their Lordships to allow them till this day three weeks. The request was acceded to, and the House consequent. ly adjourned to Tuesday the 3d of October next.

HOUSE OF COMMONS-Aug. 21.The House met pursuant to adjournment. Lord F. Osborne moved, that an humble address be presented to his Majesty to dissolve Parliament, until it should be deemed expedient to re-assemble it for the dispatch of public business. Mr Brougham begged that the amendment might be with lrawn, as the proceedings in the case of her Majes ty could not now be put an end to without great injustice to her. The amendment was negatived without a division, and the House adjourned till the 18th September.

BRITISH CHRONICLE.

Letter of Her Majesty to the King The following letter from the Queen was sent to Carlton House, from whence it was returned unopened, with an intimation that it must reach the King through the medium of his prime minister. It was therefore forwarded to Lord Liverpool; who, to an inquiry of her Majesty, stated that he had laid the letter before the King, but had not received any commands on the subject.

SIR, After the unparalleled and unprovoked persecutions, which, during a series of years, has been carried on against me under the name and authority of your Majesty and which persecution, instead of being mollified by time, time has rendered only more and more malignant and unrelenting-it is not without a great sacrifice of private feeling that I now, even in the way of remonstrance, bring myself to address this letter to your Majesty. But, bearing in mind that royalty rests on the basis of public good; that to this paramount consideration all others ought to submit; and aware of the consequences that may result from the present unconstitutional, illegal, and hitherto unheard of proceedings; with a mind thus impressed, 1 cannot refrain from laying my grievous wrongs once more before your Majesty, in the hope that the justice which your Majesty may, by evil-minded counsellors, be still disposed to refuse to the claims of a dutiful, faithful, and injured wife, you may be induced to yield to considerations connected with the honour and dignity of your Crown, the stability of your Throne, the tranquillity of your dominions, the happiness and safety of your just and loyal people, whose generous hearts revolt at

oppression and cruelty, and especially when perpetrated by a perversion and mockery of the laws.

A sense of what is due to my character and sex forbids me to refer minutely to the real causes of our domestic separation, or to the numerous unmerited insults offered me previously to that period; but, leaving to your Majesty to reconcile with the marriage vow the act of driving, by such means, a wife from beneath your roof, with an infant in her arms, your Majesty will permit me to remind you that that act was entirely your own; that the separation, so far from being sought for by me, was a sentence pronounced upon me, with out any cause assigned, other than that of your own inclinations, which, as your Majesty was pleased to allege, were not under your control.

Not to have felt, with regard to myself, chagrin at this decision of your Majesty, would have argued great insensibility to the obligations of decorum; not to have dropped a tear in the face of that beloved child, whose future sorrows were then but too easy to foresee, would have marked me as unworthy of the name of mother; but, not to have submitted to it without repining, would have indicated a consciousness of demerit, or a want of those feelings which belong to affronted and insulted female honour.

The "tranquil and comfortable society" tendered to me by your Majesty, formed in my mind but a poor compensation for the grief occasioned by considering the wound given to public morals in the fatal example produced by the indulgence of your Majesty's inclinations; more especially when I

contemplated the disappointment of the nation, who had so munificently provided

for our union, who had fondly cherished such pleasing hopes of happiness arising from that union, and who had hailed it with such affectionate and rapturous joy.

But, alas! even tranquillity and comfort were too much for me to enjoy. From the very threshold of your Majesty's mansion the mother of your child was pursued by spies, conspirators, and traitors, employ ed, encouraged, and rewarded to lay snares for the feet, and to plot against the reputa tion and life, of her whom your Majesty had so recently and so solemnly vowed to honour, to love, and to cherish.

In withdrawing from the embraces of my parents, in giving my hand to the son of George the Third and the heir apparent to the British throne, nothing less than a voice from Heaven would have made me fear injustice or wrong of any kind. What, then, was my astonishment at finding that treasons against me had been carried on and matured, perjuries against me had been methodised and embodied, a secret tribunal had been held, a trial of my actions had taken place, and a decision had been made upon those actions without my having been informed of the nature of the charge, or of the names of the witnesses; and what words can express the feelings excited by the fact, that this proceeding was founded on a request made, and on evidence furnished, by order of the father of my child, and my natural as well as legal guardian and protector?

Notwithstanding, however, the unprece dented conduct of that tribunal-conduct which has since undergone, even in Parliament, severe and unanswered animadver sions, and which has been also censured in minutes of the Privy Council-notwithstanding the secresy of the proceedings of this tribunal-notwithstanding the strong temptation to the giving of false evidence against me before it notwithstanding that there was no opportunity afforded me of rebutting that evidence notwithstanding all these circumstances, so decidedly fa vourable to my enemies even this secret tribunal acquitted me of all crime, and thereby pronounced my principal accusers to have been guilty of the grossest perjury. But it was now (after the trial was over) discovered that the nature of the tribunal was such as to render false swearing before it not legally criminal! And thus, at the suggestion and request of your Majesty, had been created, to take cognizance of and try my conduct, a tribunal competent to administer oaths, competent to examine witnesses on oath, competent to try, competent to acquit or condemn, and compe tent, moreover, to screen those who had sworn falsely against me from suffering the pains and penalties which the law awards to wilful and corrupt perjury. Great as my indignation naturally must have been

at this shameful evasion of law and justice, that indignation was lost in pity for him who could lower his princely plumes to the dust, by giving his countenance and favour to the most conspicuous of those abandoned and notorious perjurers.

Still there was one whose upright mind nothing could warp, in whose breast injustice never found a place, whose hand was always ready to raise the unfortunate, and to rescue the oppressed. While that good and gracious father and sovereign remained in the exercise of his royal functions, his unoffending daughter-in-law had nothing to fear. As long as the protecting hand of your late ever-beloved and everlamented father was held over me, I was safe. But the melancholy event which deprived the nation of the active exertions of its virtuous King, bereft me of friend and protector, and of all hope of future tranquillity and safety. To caluminate your innocent wife was now the shortest road to royal favour; and to betray her was to lay the sure foundation of boundless riches and titles of honour. Before claims like these, talent, virtue, long services, your own personal friendships, your royal engagements, promises and pledges, written as well as verbal, melted into air. Your Cabinet was founded on this basis. You took to your councils men, of whose persons, as well as whose principles, you had invariably expressed the strongest dislike. The interest of the nation, and even your own feelings, in all other respects, were sacrificed to the gratification of your desire to aggravate my sufferings and insure my humiliation. You took to your councils and your bosom men whom you hated, whose abandonment of, and whose readiness to sacrificeme were their only merits, and whose power has been exercised in a manner, and has been attended with consequences, worthy of its origin. From this unprincipled and unnatural union have sprung the manifold evils which this nation has now to endure, and which present a mass of misery and of degradation, accompanied with acts of tyranny and cruelty, rather than have seen which inflicted on his industrious, faithful, and brave people, your Reyal Father would have perished at the head of that people.

When to caluminate, revile, and betray me, became the sure path to honour and riches, it would have been strange indeed if caluminators, revilers, and traitors, had not abounded. Your Court became much less a scene of polished manners and refined intercourse, than of low intrigue and scurrility. Spies, Bacchanalian tale-bearers, and foul conspirators, swarmed in those places which had before been the resort of sobriety, virtue, and honour. To enume rate all the various privations and mortifi cations which I had to endure-all the insults that were wantonly heaped upon me, from the day of your elevation to the Re

gency to that of my departure for the Continent would be to describe every species of personal offence that can be offered to, and every pain short of bodily violence that can be inflicted on, any human being. Bereft of parent, brother, and father-in-law, and my husband for my deadliest foe; seeing those who have promised to support bought by rewards to be amongst my ene mies; restrained from accusing my foes in the face of the world, out of regard for the character of the father of my child, and from a desire to prevent her happiness from being disturbed; shunned from motives of selfishness by those who were my natural associates: living in obscurity, while I ought to have been the centre of all that was splendid; thus humbled, I had one consolation left-the love of my dear and only child. To permit me to enjoy this was too great an indulgence. To see my daughter; to fold her in my arms; to mingle my tears with hers; to receive her cheering caresses, and to hear from her lips assurances of never ceasing love; thus to be comforted, consoled, upheld, and blessed, was too much to be allowed me. Even on the slave mart the cries of "Oh! my mother, my mother! Oh! my child, my child!" have prevented a separation of the victims of avarice. But your advisers, more inhuman than the slave-dealers, remorselessly tore the mother from the child.

Thus bereft of the society of my child, or reduced to the necessity of embittering her life by struggles to preserve that society, I resolved on a temporary absence, in the hope that time might restore me to her in happier days. Those days, alas! were never to come. To mothers-and those mothers who have been suddenly bereft of the best and most affectionate and only daughters-it belongs to estimate my sufferings and my wrongs. Such mothers will judge of my affliction upon hearing of the death of my child, and upon my calling to recollection the last look, the last words, and all the affecting circumstances of our separation. Such mothers will see the depth of my sorrows. Every being with a heart of humanity in its bosom will drop a tear, in sympathy with me. And will not the world, then, learn with indignation that this event, calculated to soften the hardest heart, was the signal for new conspiracies, and indefatigable efforts for the destruction of this afflicted mother? Your Majesty had torn my child from me; you had deprived me of the power of being at hand to succour her; you had taken from me the possibility of hearing her last prayers for her mother; you saw me bereft, forlorn, and broken-hearted; and this was the nioment you chose for redoubling your persecutions.

Let the world pass its judgment on the sonstituting of a commission, in a foreign

country, consisting of inquisitors, spies, and informers, to discover, collect, and arrange matters of accusation against your wife, without any complaint having been communicated to her; let the world judge of the employment of ambassadors in such a business, and of the enlisting of foreign courts in the enterprise; but on the measures which have been adopted to give final effect to these preliminary proceedings, it is for me to speak; it is for me to remonstrate with your Majesty; it is for me to protest; it is for me to apprize you of my determination.

I have always demanded a fair trial. This is what I now demand, and this is refused me. Instead of a fair trial, 1 am to be subjected to a sentence by the Parlia ment, passed in the shape of a law. Against this I protest, and upon the following grounds :

The injustice of refusing me a clear and distinct charge, of refusing me the names of the witnesses, of refusing me the names of the places where the alleged acts have been committed; these are sufficiently flagrant and revolting; but it is against the constitution of the Court itself that I particularly object, and that I most solemnly protest.

Whatever may be the precedents as to Bills of Pains and Penalties, none of them, except those relating to the Queen of Henry the Eighth, can apply here; for here your Majesty is the Plaintiff. Here it is intended by the Bill to do you what you deem good, and to do me great harm. You are, therefore, a party, and the only complaining party.

You have made your complaint to the House of Lords. You have conveyed to this House written documents sealed up. A Secret Committee of the House have examined these documents. They have reported that there are grounds of proceed ing; and then the House, merely upon that Report, have brought forward a Bill containing the most outrageous slanders on me, and sentencing me to divorce and degradation.

The injustice of putting forth this Bill to the world for six weeks before it is even proposed to afford me an opportunity of contradicting its allegations is too manifest not to have shocked the nation; and, indeed, the proceedings even thus far are such as to convince every one that no justice is intended me.. But if none of these proceedings, if none of these clear indications of a determination to do me wrong had taken place, I should see, in the constitution of the House of Lords itself, a certainty that I could expect no justice at its hands.

Your Majesty's Ministers have advised this prosecution; they are responsible for the advice they give; they are liable to punishment if they fail to make good their

[ocr errors]

charges; and not only are they part of my judges, but it is they who have brought in the bill; and it is too notorious that they have always a majority in the House; so that without any other, here is ample proof that the House will decide in favour of the bill, and, of course, against me.

But further, there are reasons for your Ministers having a majority in this case, and which reasons do not apply to common cases. Your Majesty is the Plaintiff'; to you it belongs to appoint and to elevate Peers. Many of the present Peers have been raised to that dignity by yourself, and almost the whole can be, at your will and pleasure, further elevated. The far greater part of the Peers hold, by themselves and their families, offices, pensions, and other emoluments, solely at the will and pleasure of your Majesty, and these, of course, your Majesty can take away when ever you please. There are more than four-fifths of the Peers in this situation, and there are many of them who might thus be deprived of the far better part of their incomes.

If, contrary to all expectation, there should be found, in some Peers, likely to amount to a majority, a disposition to reject the bill, some of these Peers may be ordered away to their ships, regiments, governments, and other duties; and, which is an equally alarming power, new Peers may be created for the purpose, and give their vote in the decision. That your Majesty's Ministers would advise these measures, if found necessary to render their prosecution successful, there can be very little doubt; seeing that they have hitherto stopped at nothing, however unjust or odious.

To regard such a body as a Court of Justice would be to calumniate that sacred name; and for me to suppress an expression of my opinion on the subject would be tacitly to lend myself to my own destruction, as well as to an imposition upon the nation and the world.

In the House of Commons I can discover no better grounds of security. The power of your Majesty's Ministers is the same in both Houses; and your Majesty is well acquainted with the fact, that a majority of this House is composed of persons placed in it by the Peers and by your Majesty's Treasury.

it really gives me pain to state these things to your Majesty; and if it gives your Majesty pain, I beg that it may be observed and remembered that the statement has been forced from me. I must either protest against this mode of trial, or by tacitly consenting to it, suffer my honour to be sacrificed. No innocence can se cure the accused if the Judges and Jurors be chosen by the accuser; and if I were tacitly to submit to a tribunal of this description, I should be instrumental in my own dishonour.

On these grounds I protest against this species of trial. I demand a trial in a Court where the Jurors are taken impartially from amongst the people, and where the proceedings are open and fair. Such a trial I court, and to no other will I willingly submit. If your Majesty persevere in the present proceedings, I shall, even in the Houses of Parliament, face my accusers; but I shall regard any decision they may make against me as not in the smallest degree reflecting on my honour; and I will not, except compelled by actual force, submit to any sentence which shall not be pronounced by a Court of Justice.

I have now frankly laid before your Majesty a statement of my wrongs, and a declaration of my views and intentions. You have cast upon me every slur to which the female character is liable. Instead of loving, honouring, and cherishing me, agreeably to your solemn vow, you have pursued me with hatred and scorn, and with all the means of destruction. You wrested from me my child, and with her my only comfort and consolation. You sent me sorrowing through the world, and even in my sorrows pursued me with unrelenting persecution. Having left me nothing but my innocence, you would now, by a mockery of justice, deprive me even of the reputation of possessing that. The poisoned bowl and the poniard are means more manly than perjured witnesses and partial tribunals; and they are less cruel, inasmuch as life is less valuable than ho

[blocks in formation]

Execution of James Wilson.-On the 30th ult. at 3 o'clock, James Wilson, who was convicted of high treason before the Special Commission, (see page 176,) was hanged in front of Glasgow jail, and then beheaded by a person in a mask, who with an axe cut off his head at one stroke. Since receiving sentence, he has been regularly visited by the Rev. Mr Ewing, the Rev. Dr Dewar, and the Rev. Dr Wardlaw, and several other persons distinguished for piety.

9.-Execution of Hardie and Baird.Yesterday Andrew Hardie and John Baird, convicted of high treason at Stirling, (see page 176,) were executed at that place, by hanging and decapitation, agreeably to their sentence. They both behaved with much propriety and met their fate with firmness. Hardie was 27 years of age, and was bred a weaver.-Baird was 31 years of age, also a weaver. They had both been in

the army, and neither of them were married.

Military Arrest of a Clergyman !-The Rev. William Gillespie, minister of Kells, has published a discourse, under circumstances that may well be deemed extraordinary. This Reverend Gentleman has for some years acted as chaplain to the Stewartry Yeomanry, and on Sunday the 30th July, he preached before the corps, which was then assembled at Kirkcudbright, one of the most loyal and patriotic discourses ever delivered from a pulpit. In his prayer, however, after many petitions in behalf of his Majesty, he added the words, "Bless also the Queen;" and for this he was placed under military arrest by his commanding officer, Colonel Gordon, who is also Sheriff of the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright. This proceeding excited a strong feeling of surprise-particularly among the members of the Presbytery of Kirkcudbright, who are no strangers to the soundness of Mr Gillespie's political principles, and who are themselves in the general practice of praying for her Majesty.

Another singular circumstance, with which the above mentioned proceeding appears connected, took place on the 16th July. The parish of Crossmichael being vacant, the Rev. Mr Jeffrey of Girthon was on that day appointed to preach; and on that occasion, as was his constant practice, he prayed for the Queen. Sir Alexander Gordon, Stewart-Depute, and his son, Mr James Gordon, Sheriff of the Stewartry, were present, and, after service, requested Mr Jeffrey to convene a meeting of the Kirk-session, which he did accordingly; when Mr James Gordon proposed a resolution, that no minister appointed to preach in that parish, during the vacancy, should pray in express words for the Queen. Sir Alex. Gordon and Mr Jeffrey being the only persons present, besides the mover, the resolution was of course carried; Mr Jeffrey protesting, and appealing to the Presbytery.

The Presbytery, on the 2d August, or dered the resolution in question to be erased from the Session Book of Crossmichael. At the same time, they took into consideration the case of Mr Gillespie's arrest by Colonel Gordon for praying for the Queen, when they unanimously agreed that the Chaplain of the corps had done nothing to merit such treatment, and came to the resolution of laying the Commandant's conduct before the next General Assembly of the Church of Scotland.

However, on the 6th instant, Sir Alexander Gordon and his son appeared at the bar of the Presbytery, and having there stated, that, in obedience to the judgment of the Presbytery of the 2d of August, they had erased from the records of the Kirk-session the minute in which the obnoxious resolution in question was contained, and declared that they had no intention

of infringing on the rights of the church, however in appearance they had seemed to do so, and in the amplest manner apologi sed for their conduct; the Presbytery were pleased to accept their apology, and agreed to sist all further procedure in the business.

Reunion of the Secession Church.-This happy event was consummated on Friday the 8th instant, in Bristo Street Meeting-house, Edinburgh, the spot on which, seventythree years before, the separation took place.

The two Synods met in the morning of that day, the General Associate Synod in their Synod-house, Nicolson Street, and the Associate Synod in the Rev. Mr Lothian's Meeting-house, Portsburgh; and after having finished the business that had been submitted to them severally, adjourned, constituted, to Bristo Street, at half past twelve o'clock, walking in regular or der to the place of meeting; first the Ministers, then the Elders, Probationers for the Ministry, and Students of Divinity. After the two Synods were seated in a part of the Meeting-house which had been railed in for their reception, and in alternate pews, so that they were completely intermingled, the two Moderators in front of the pulpit, and the two clerks at a little distance on the right and left, the senior Modérator gave out a Psalm, (cii. 17-22,) in which the Synods and the whole attending multitude joined. The senior Moderator (the Rev. Dr Jamieson, Edinburgh, belonging to the General Associate Synody then rose, and called on the Clerk of the Synod whom he represented to read their last minute. After the Clerk had done so, the junior Moderator, (the Rev. Mr Bal mer, of Berwick, belonging to the Associ ate Synod,) in like manner called on the Clerk of the Synod whom he represented to read their last minute. The minutes read by the Clerks in succession were nearly in the same words, and to the following effect:

"The General Associate Synod, having accepted the Basis of Union, and having, by the good hand of God upon them, now finished all their own business, and all preparatory arrangements, this Synod, with fervent gratitude to God for having led them thus far, and in humble dependence on his grace, to bless the solemn and interesting step which they are now about to take, and to enable them to improve the privileges, and discharge the duties which are about to devolve upon them in conse quence of it-do resolve, and hereby record their resolution, forthwith to repair to the appointed place, that they may unite with their brethren of the other Synod, to be known by the name of The United Associate Synod of the Secession Church,' composed of the Associate (commonly cal led Burgher) Synod, and of the General Associate (commonly called Anti-Burgher) Synod, that they may henceforth walk with them in the fear of God and in the comfort

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »