 But I do not conceive that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement has nothing to do with the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law.  The Fuller Court: Justices, Rulings, and Legacy저자: James W. Ely Jr., James W. Ely - 2003 - 318 페이지미리보기 없음 - 도서 정보
 | Massachusetts. Department of Labor and Industries. Division of Statistics - 1905 - 378 페이지
...Holmes, in his separate dissenting opinion, goes even more fundamently into the question at issue: " ' This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. ... It is settled by various decisions of this court that State constitutions and State laws may regulate... | |
 | National Conference on Social Welfare - 1910 - 716 페이지
...the Court, and it was the occasion of a most striking dissenting opinion by Justice Holmes. He says : "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country do not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study... | |
 | George Gorham Groat - 1911 - 432 페이지
...the majority opinion of the United States supreme court which held against the New York Bakeshop law, This case is decided upon an economic theory which...does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agree with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. But... | |
 | 1912 - 1526 페이지
...Mr. Justice Holmes, in his dissenting opinion in Lochner c. New York ( 198 US, 45, p. 75 ) , says : This case is decided upon an economic theory which...country does not entertain. If It were a question of whether I agreed with that theory I should desire to study it further and long before making up... | |
 | New York (State). Dept. of Labor - 1912 - 1080 페이지
...living, are mere meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual "; and Justice Holmes says " This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain," and again " But a constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of paternalism... | |
 | Ohio. Courts - 1912 - 740 페이지
...decided from an economic standpoint. " He says that "if it were a question whether I agreed with the economic theory, which a large part of the country does not entertain, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind." Again he says: "It is settled... | |
 | New York (State). Courts - 1913 - 744 페이지
...living, are mere meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual ;" and Justice Holmes says " This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain," and again "But a constitution is not intended to embody a particular Misc.] Supreme Court, January,... | |
 | 1913 - 1390 페이지
...living, are mere meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual ;" and Justice Holmes says, "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain," and again : "But a Constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of... | |
 | Mary Van Kleeck - 1913 - 328 페이지
...living, are mere meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual"; and Justice Holmes says "this case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain," and again "but a constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of paternalism... | |
 | James Parker Hall - 1914 - 528 페이지
...plainly, palpably, beyond all question, inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States. * * * Mr. Justice HOLMES dissenting: I regret sincerely...large part of the country does not entertain. If it wefe a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before... | |
| |
