United States Code ServiceLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1985 |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
92°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 3°³
150 ÆäÀÌÁö
... Agreement among competitors to fix maxi- mum prices , no less than agreement to fix mini- mum prices , violates 15 USCS ¡× 1 because it cripples freedom of traders and thereby restrains their ability to sell in accordance with their own ...
... Agreement among competitors to fix maxi- mum prices , no less than agreement to fix mini- mum prices , violates 15 USCS ¡× 1 because it cripples freedom of traders and thereby restrains their ability to sell in accordance with their own ...
158 ÆäÀÌÁö
... agreement , oral or written . Esco Corp. v United States ( 1965 , CA9 Or ) 340 F2d 1000 , 1965 CCH Trade Cases ¢Ò 71365 . Prices are fixed when they are agreed upon , and such agreement may be inferred or implied from acts and conduct of ...
... agreement , oral or written . Esco Corp. v United States ( 1965 , CA9 Or ) 340 F2d 1000 , 1965 CCH Trade Cases ¢Ò 71365 . Prices are fixed when they are agreed upon , and such agreement may be inferred or implied from acts and conduct of ...
172 ÆäÀÌÁö
... agreement was cast substan- tially in form of consignment agreement between franchisor and its sales agent , this by no means immunized franchisor from charge of price fix- ing . Stan Togut Corp. v Hobart Mfg . Co. ( 1974 , SD NY ) 398 ...
... agreement was cast substan- tially in form of consignment agreement between franchisor and its sales agent , this by no means immunized franchisor from charge of price fix- ing . Stan Togut Corp. v Hobart Mfg . Co. ( 1974 , SD NY ) 398 ...
¸ñÂ÷
TITLE 15COMMERCE AND TRADE | 1 |
2A Securities and Trust Indentures | 9 |
Chapter Beginning Section | 23 |
ÀúÀÛ±Ç | |
Ç¥½ÃµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ¼½¼Ç 22°³
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
1972 CCH Trade 70 S Ct 97 S Ct Act 15 USCS action affd agreement alleged ALR Fed American anticompetitive antitrust laws Asso attempt to monopolize BNA LRRM CA5 Tex CA7 Ill CA8 Mo CA9 Cal CCH LC cert den cert den 429 combination competition competitors conspiracy conspired constitute contract Corp corporation court dealers defendant defendant's distributor effect F Supp Fed Rules Evid federal antitrust laws franchise group boycott illegal interstate commerce L Ed 2d later app later proceeding license manufacturer manufacturer's ment monopoly power National Football League ND Cal Noerr-Pennington doctrine patent plaintiff price fixing purchase refusal to deal reh den CA5 relevant market remand restrain trade restraint of trade retail revd rule of reason Rules Evid Serv sell Serv 2d Sherman Act 15 tied product tion tying arrangement United unlawful USPQ violate Sherman Act violation of 15 violation of Sherman