...the Court sustained the Oklahoma Bank Guaranty Law, in which it was conceded by the Court ' ' that by this law a portion of its property might be taken...return to pay debts of a failing rival in business." Having conceded that, the Court, however, said, "there are more powerful considerations on the other...

...Haskell, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 187.) Mr. Justice Holmes conceded that by this law a portion of the defendant's property ''might be taken without return to pay debts of a failing rival in business." But said the Court, "it is established by a series of cases that an ulterior public advantage may justify...

...(see Receiver of Dariby Bank v. State Treasurer, 39 Vermont, 92. 98), still there is no denying that by this law a portion of its property might be taken...advantage may justify a comparatively insignificant taking ot private property for what, in its immediate purpose, is a private use. Clark v. Nash, 198 US 361....

...purpose were given up (see Danby Bank v. State Treasurer, 39 Vt. 92, 98), still there is no denying that by this law a portion of its property might be taken...cases that an ulterior public advantage may justify •For other cases see same topic & \ NUMBER In Dec. & Am. Digs. UQ7 to date. & Rep'r Indexes a comparatively...

...September, 1908. They illustrate that the conclusion of law that a portion of the bank's property may be taken without return to pay debts of a failing rival in business is unsupported by authority. In Clark v. Nash, 198 US 361; Strickley v. Highland Boy Mining Co., 200...

...purpose were given up (see Danby Bank v. State Treasurer, 39 Vt. 92, 98), still there is no denying that by this law a portion of its property might be taken...place, it is established by a series of cases that au ulterior public advantage may justify a comparatively insignificant taking of private property for...

...given up (see Danby 37 LRA(NS) Bank v. State Treasurer, 39 Vt. 92, 98), still there is no denying that by this law a portion of its property might be taken...failing rival in business. Nevertheless, notwithstanding tlie logical form of the objection, there are more powerful considerations on the other side. In the...

...were np (see Receiver of Dauby Bank v. State Treasurer, 39 Vt., 92, 98) still tbere la no denying that by this law a portion of Its property might be taken without return to pay debts of a falling rival In business. Nevertheless, notwithstanding the logical form of the objection, there are...

...(219 US 104, 31 Sup. Ct. R. 186, Jan. 3, 1911), affirming 22 Okla. 48, 97 Pac. 590, the court declared that "an ulterior public advantage may justify a comparatively insignificant taking of private property lor what, in its immediate purpose, is a private use." In Lindsley v. Nat. Carbonic Gas Co. (220 US...

...purpose were given up (see Dauby Hank v. State Treasurer, 39 Vt., 92, 9S), still there is no denying that by this law a portion of its property might be taken...debts of a failing rival in business. Nevertheless, uotwithstaudiug the logical form of the objection, there are more powerful considerations on the other...