ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub

SLOWING SALE HOUSE MARKET PERMITTED HOME BUILDER DIVERSIFICATION TO HOME BUILDER MARKET ... There is little up-to-date data on the producers in the construction industry, but most of the scattered evidence indicates that the postwar boom in 1-family housing permitted the growth of strong economic units among builders--well-organized, more sophisticated, and better capitalized. There is also evidence that the huge backlog of effective demand for sale housing, which was partly a product of the low building rates of the depression in the war years, was largely worked off by the end of the 50's. That is to say that part of the demand which could be made effective through consumer purchasing power, at current prices and financing terms, was largely used up. (There may be substantial market below this "effective level" which could be opened up under proper conditions.) With home builders left only with the year-to-year natural gains in new households, the sale house market began to become somewhat leaner, leaving substantial production capacity to seek other market outlets. Rental housing was a natural, as many builders acknowledged in a recent survey (see page 11). The bulk of the home builder excursion into the rental market has probably been in the light construction area--duplexes, walk-up apartments, and garden-type--though a survey of 500 NAHB builders in the spring of 1962 turned up 30 who were building high-rise elevator buildings as well.

...

TAX SHELTER PROVIDES INCENTIVE FOR RENTAL INVESTMENT The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 permitted new buildings for the first time to qualify for accelerated depreciation under the sum-of-the-years-digits and doubled declining balance methods. This offered rental investors the opportunity for a high rate of cash flow with minimum tax liability during the important early years of the investment. While abuses have been alleged (of conversion of ordinary income to capital gains through this process by early sale) the arguments are by no means one-sided. And it is questioned whether the rental housing market would be adequately supplied without an incentive of this sort.

...

For

SOME OTHER CAUSES BEHIND THE BOOM While the factors already mentioned seem to be the principal ones, others should at least be briefly mentioned. instance, anticipated future demand appears to be playing as significant a part in the current supply as is immediate demand. The assurance that the demand apparent in population figures can be sustained over the years ahead probably permits investment now, even where current market conditions are less than optimum.

The race issue should not be overlooked as a factor--both on the demand side and the supply side. Housing prospects may tend to find integrated apartment projects more acceptable than integrated 1-family dwelling projects. For one thing, they aren't concerned about resale value of the property and for another, "neighborhood relations" in apartments are on a less intimate basis. On the supply side, builders may find rental property less risky than sale home projects if housing prospects appear to find apartments more acceptable under conditions of anti-bias regulation and enforcement.

RENTAL MARKET UNDERBUILT IN THE 50'S The low rate of rental building during the 50's probably represented underbuilding in the market. There is most certainty a part of the population who by preference, mobility demands, or financial assets, will always prefer apartments. Part of this segment is no doubt a luxury market and the low building rate of the 50's probably forced this segment to remain mostly in older buildings, providing a natural backlog for the construction of new luxury units.

GROWTH OF 1-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS ... A large portion of our household growth in the 50's came from one person households and others headed by unrelated individuals. These people normally are doubled up, either with relatives, friends, or in rooming houses, but economic prosperity helped to permit a new level of freedom of choice in housing accommodations. This is evident at all age levels, but a growing number of widowed persons among the aged appears as the largest contributor. In particular, economic factors such as social security and the trend toward increased pension provisions is permitting more of the senior citizen group to maintain separate households.

...

SLOWING OF INFLATION During the inflation of the 50's a number of persons and families who ordinarily might have been restricted to the rental housing market because of their mobility undoubtedly found their way to home ownership as a profitable substitute for renting. In essence, it was possible during some periods to live in an owner-occupied home for short periods from one to three years and dispose of it at a profit or little net loss. Inflation appears to be slowing down which would tend to take some of these household units out of the ownership market.

A SLOWDOWN OF INFLATION MAY ALSO BE STIMULATING DEVELOPMENT OF SPECULATIVE HOLDINGS As inflation wanes, a speculative real estate holding becomes less and less profitable, as a source of gain. It then becomes increasingly necessary to develop the property for its maximum permissible use in order to realize the market values currently achieved. Speculators may either develop themselves, or sell to other developers--but the opportunities to sell to other speculators must inevitably diminish if inflation slows down.

SOME OTHER FACTORS Such factors as the gradual breakdown of urban transportation systems, the need to consolidate recent urban expansion with some higher density development, the trend toward apartments in the suburbs as communities seek to broaden their tax base are also contributing factors to the boom. Some others would include the need to distribute high land costs through higher density development, the stimulus of government urban renewal programs and private renewal, the broad range of new government insurance programs in the multi-family housing area, etc. There may also be a tendency for communities to reduce the zoning, planning and code obstacles to higher density development-though there is as yet no indication of any similar tendency which would be favorable to providing smaller home sites for small low-priced 1-family units. This need appears urgent if the housing market is to be broadly served. One more contributing factor which should be mentioned is the growth of foreclosures on 1-family houses. Despite the abundance of mortgage capital, the rising foreclosure trend has probably made lenders more wary of 1-family home loans and may be raising barriers to credit qualifications. This trend, if true, could be an added stimulus to diverting part of the flow of mortgage capital to the apartment markets.

[blocks in formation]

...

BEC SURVEY SHOWS ARTIFICIAL SUPPLY STIMULANTS AT WORK A survey of the NAHB Builders' Economic Council in the spring of 1963 suggested that artificial stimulants were a significant factor in the current rental housing boom. This does not necessarily permit a conclusion that rental housing supply will exceed the demand for it. But it does suggest the need for very careful evaluation of both supply and demand to assure that they do not get badly out of balance.

Details of the BEC views on the rental housing market are contained in the full survey report. The table below summarizes only a part of the survey results.

[blocks in formation]

There are no doubt a number of biases in this type of question, and its suggestion may well be exaggerated. It is presented here for only the insight it appears to provide as to the nature and rank of the factors behind the boom.

An implied suggestion here is that--when supply stimulants not directly related to demand are combined with the long lead time involved in putting apartment buildings on the market, the danger of substantial overbuilding would appear to multiply. The fact that 72% of the BEC builders felt that overbuilding was occurring in their areas, combined with the indications of continued rise in multi-family building nationally add some seriousness to this consideration.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

...

NEW CONSTRUCTION FOR THE 60s ESTIMATED AT 16 MILLION In 1959, NAHB made a projection of new construction for the 60s of 16 million units. While we are at the moment running behind schedule during the first three years of the decade, the projection still seems reasonable and attainable for the decade as a whole. New data, however, suggests changing some of its components. There are three separate areas of housing inventory changes to be considered in any projection of new construction: (1) the net additions to the occupied inventory in other words, net new household formations; (2) the number of units which will be removed from the inventory and require replacement, due to such causes as demolition, fire, flood, abandonment, net changes to non-residential use, etc.; and finally, (3) net additions to the vacant inventory. A set of high, median, and low projections of these three components are presented in the table below.

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

1/

2/

In addition to the normal vacant inventory, gross vacant units
will include second homes, seasonal housing, habitable units
not offered on the market for one reason or another, and
substandard units which are nonetheless offered on the market.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

AGE MIX A KEY FACTOR IN RENTAL DEMAND ... There are a wide variety of factors which could be considered in projecting rental housing markets. But it appears that the age mix question not only overshadows the rest of the issues, but is probably closely related to many other issues; for example, to the distribution of financial assets and income, and to mobility characteristics. Further, it must necessarily be assumed that over the long run, supply forces will balance out. (The circumstances where they would fail to balance out do not lend themselves to prediction.)

An examination of home ownership rates in different age groups reveals wide variations in the rates among the various age groups. (See Table VII) If we could expect the factors that determine the net increase in households and the home ownership rates--by age group--for 1970 to remain constant, it would seem a simple matter to predict the decade's markets for rental housing. The fact of the matter is that they don't remain constant--and most importantly only slight variations in assumptions, all of them reasonably defensible, produce wide variations in the results.

[blocks in formation]

Source:

NAHB estimates based on incomplete data from Bureau of the Census

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »