 | 1921 - 1162 페이지
...delivery or by a qualified indorsement warrants : * * * 2. That he has a good title to It. * • • 4. That he has no knowledge of any fact which would...validity of the instrument or render it valueless." [3] It follows that, when the appellant had presented sufficient evidence of fraud or wrongful purpose... | |
 | 1913 - 1288 페이지
...purports to be ; that he has good title to it ; that all prior parties had capacity to contract ; and that he has no knowledge of any fact which would impair...validity of the instrument or render it valueless. Negotiable Instruments Law (Consol. Laws 1909, c. 38) §§ 115, 116. Where, however, these words are... | |
 | 1906 - 1408 페이지
...that the instrument is genuine; that nil prior parties had capacity to contract; that the Indorser has no knowledge of any fact which would Impair the validity of the Instrument ; that the instrument Is valid and subsisting ; and that on due presentment it shall be paid according... | |
 | South Dakota. Supreme Court - 1917 - 794 페이지
...or by qualified indorsement, warrants : instrument is negotiated by delivery only, the contract of warranty extends in favor of no holder other than the immediate transferee. Section 65, suflxl. 4. The negotiator of the instrument, under the correct interpretation of this section,... | |
 | Florida - 1897 - 426 페이지
...the payee, he is liable to all parties subsequent to the payee. 2. That he has a good title to it; 4. That he has no knowledge of any fact which would...validity of the instrument or render it valueless. 3. That all prior parties had capacity to contracl; But when the negotiation is by delivery only, the... | |
 | Massachusetts - 1898 - 48 페이지
...deRveryor 2. That he has a good title to it ; 3. That all prior parties had capacity to contract ; 4. That he has no knowledge of any fact which would...validity of the instrument or render it valueless. instrument But when the negotiation is by delivery only the wardeSver^eodni7. ranty extends in favor... | |
 | Wisconsin - 1899 - 856 페이지
...purports to be. 2. That he has good title to it. 3. That all prior parties had capacity to ("*1B" tract ; 4. That he has no knowledge of any fact which would...validity of the instrument or render it valueless. lint when the negotiation is by delivery only, the warranty extends in favor of no holder other than... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1900 - 396 페이지
...be; (2) that he has a good title to it ; 3 (3) that all prior par* ties had capacity to contract ; 4 (4) that he has no knowledge of any fact which would...impair the validity of the instrument or render it valueless.6 1 Meyer v. Richards, 163 U. 8. 385. * Littaner v. Goldman, 72 NY 506 ; Bell v. Dagg, 60... | |
 | Pennsylvania. Laws, statutes, etc - 1901 - 1022 페이지
...Negotiation by broker or agent. Presentment for 1-ayment. 3. That all prior parties had capacity to contract. 4. That he has no knowledge of any fact which would...section do not apply to persons negotiating public or corporation securities, other than bills and notes. Section 66. Every indorser who indorses without... | |
 | United States - 1901 - 934 페이지
...Second. That he has a good title to it. Third. That all prior parties had capacity to contract. Fourth. That he has no knowledge of any fact which would impair...of no holder other than the immediate transferee. persons negotiating public or corporate securities other than bills and notes. Liability of gen- ^ECi... | |
| |
Every person negotiating an instrument by delivery or by a qualified indorsement, warrants — 1. That the instrument is genuine and in all respects what it purports to be; 2. That he has a good title to it; 3. That all prior" parties had capacity to... 
