...burned without her fault, by the negligent operation of the mill, and the injury was the result of a continuous succession of events, so linked together as to make a natural whole, even though defendant could not have anticipated such injury, is not misleading as permitting a verdict...

...of the cause of action." In Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 469, it is said : "The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? * * * The inquiry must, therefore, always be whether there was any intermediate cause, disconnected...

...followed in unbroken sequence as the direct and proximate result of it, so that "the facts constituted a continuous succession of events, so linked together as to make a natural whole" (Railway v. Kellog, 94 US, 475), without any intervening and independent act creating new damage or...

...as in the oft-cited case of the squib thrown in the market place. Scott v. Shepherd, 2 W. Bl. 892. The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...the injury— a continuous operation? Did the facts constitnte a continnous succession of events so linked together as to make a natural whole, or was...

...moved by a force applied to the other end, that force being the proximate canse of the movement.' * * * 'The question always is, was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the injury — a continnous operation? Did the facts constitute a continnous succession of events, so linked together...

...of the latter materials to the plaintiff s lumber, in such case the jury must determine whether such facts constitute a continuous succession of events so linked together as to be a natural whole, or whether the chain is so broken as to become indopendant. and the final result,...

...Anderson v. Baltimore & Ohio Ry. Co., 74 W. Va. 21, 81 SE 581, 51 LRA (NS) 892, in which case it is said : "The question always is: Was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?" According to the evidence in this case there was an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and...

...responsible ones." In the case of Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 469, 24 L. Ed. 256, the court says: "The question always is: Was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? . . . It is generally held that in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting...

...proximate cause of a disaster, though it may operate through successive instruments. 2 Blacks. Rep., 892. The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to...

...movement, or, as in the oft-cited case of the squib thrown in the market-place. (2 Blacks. Rep. 892.) The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury ? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order...