Southern Reporter, 102권West Publishing Company, 1925 Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi, the Appellate Courts of Alabama and, Sept. 1928/Jan. 1929-Jan./Mar. 1941, the Courts of Appeal of Louisiana. |
도서 본문에서
24 페이지
... relation to the governing body . There can be no reason for holding a municipal corporation responsi- ble for the act of a subordinate agent or employee , and not responsible for the act of the superior engaged in the same service ...
... relation to the governing body . There can be no reason for holding a municipal corporation responsi- ble for the act of a subordinate agent or employee , and not responsible for the act of the superior engaged in the same service ...
36 페이지
... relation to Southern Railway Company . That relation was merely the occasion which brought plaintiff within the class of persons rightfully passing under the overhead wire . The duty to provide against danger was a duty to plaintiff ...
... relation to Southern Railway Company . That relation was merely the occasion which brought plaintiff within the class of persons rightfully passing under the overhead wire . The duty to provide against danger was a duty to plaintiff ...
58 페이지
... relation of its Attorney General , for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to re- view and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Jesse Harper v . State , 102 So. 55 . Writ denied . ANDERSON , C. J. , and ...
... relation of its Attorney General , for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to re- view and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Jesse Harper v . State , 102 So. 55 . Writ denied . ANDERSON , C. J. , and ...
86 페이지
... relation of the City of Oakdale , against the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company . Judgment for relator , and defendant appeals . Affirmed . Hudson , Potts , Bernstein & Sholars , of Monroe , for appellant . C. D. Reed , City Atty . , of ...
... relation of the City of Oakdale , against the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company . Judgment for relator , and defendant appeals . Affirmed . Hudson , Potts , Bernstein & Sholars , of Monroe , for appellant . C. D. Reed , City Atty . , of ...
92 페이지
... relation of subtenant . Plaintiff objected to the testimony as being ultra petitionem and not admissible . The objection was referred to the merits . Judgment was rendered , as between plaintiff and defendant , in favor of the plaintiff ...
... relation of subtenant . Plaintiff objected to the testimony as being ultra petitionem and not admissible . The objection was referred to the merits . Judgment was rendered , as between plaintiff and defendant , in favor of the plaintiff ...
기타 출판본 - 모두 보기
자주 나오는 단어 및 구문
action Affirmed Alabama alleged amended Amite County amount Appeal from Circuit appellant appellee Atty authority averred Bank BOULDIN cause certiorari Chancery Court charge Circuit Court claim complainant Constitution contract contributory negligence conviction Coun counsel Court of Appeal court of equity Court of Mississippi Criminal law damages death debt deceased decree defendant defendant's demurrer Digests and Indexes duty equity error evidence fact fendant filed held Hillsborough county injury issue judgment jurisdiction jury Key-Numbered Digests lands Legislature liability liquors Lumber ment Miss Mississippi mortgage negligence notes officers opinion Orleans overruled owner paid parties payment person petition plaintiff plea prosecution question railroad reasonable refused remainderman remanded rendered Reversed reversible error rule Shreveport statute suit supra Supreme Court testified testimony thereof tion topic and KEY-NUMBER trial court usury verdict wife witness writ
인기 인용구
329 페이지 - To constitute notice of an infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating the same, the person to whom it is negotiated must have had actual knowledge of the infirmity or defect, or knowledge of such facts that his action in taking the instrument amounted to bad faith.
370 페이지 - A cheque is a Bill of Exchange drawn on a banker payable on demand. Promissory Note. — A Promissory Note is an unconditional promise in writing made by one person to another, signed by the maker, engaging to pay on demand or at a fixed...
209 페이지 - In the hands of any holder other than a holder in due course, a negotiable instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.
389 페이지 - ... more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or by imprisonment in the county jail for not less than ten days nor more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment in the discretion of the court.
372 페이지 - Exchange is an unconditional order in writing, addressed by one person to another, signed by the person giving it, requiring the person to whom it is addressed to pay on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum certain in money to or to the order of a specified person, or to bearer.
330 페이지 - an unqualified order or promise to pay is unconditional within the meaning of this Act though coupled with . . . a statement of the transaction which gives rise to the instrument.
71 페이지 - Except as herein provided, the payment of a premium or installment thereof shall not maintain the policy in force beyond the date when the next premium or installment thereof is payable.
82 페이지 - It may be mentioned in this place that though papers and other subjects of evidence may have been illegally taken from the possession of the party against whom they are offered or otherwise unlawfully obtained, this is no valid objection to their admissibility if they are pertinent to the issue.
165 페이지 - It is a familiar canon of construction that a thing which is within the intention of the makers of a statute is as much within the statute as if it were within the letter; and a thing which is within the letter of the statute is not within the statute unless it be within the intention of the makers.
469 페이지 - The Rule against Perpetuities is not a rule of construction, but a peremptory command of law. It is not, like a rule of construction, a test, more or less artificial to determine intention. Its object is to defeat intention. Therefore, every provision in a will or settlement is to be construed as if the Rule did not exist. Then, to the provisions so construed, the Rule is to be remorselessly applied.