Sanborn, and Maxwell Evarts, for respondents. GREAT SOUTHERN FIREPROOF HOTEL HEBBERD et al. v. BALTIMORE BUILD- HILLER et al. v. LADD et al. (February INSURANCE CO. OF NORTH AMERICA INTERLAKE TRANSP. CO. et al. v. MA- INTERNATIONAL BANK OF ST. LOUIS JAKOBSEN v. SPRINGER et al. (May 1, KIESEL & CO. v. SUN INS. OFFICE OF KNIGHTS TEMPLARS & MASONS' LIFE MICHIGAN STOVE CO. v. FULLER-WARRÊN CO. (November 28, 1898.) No. 597. Ephraim Banning and Thomas A. Banning, for petitioner. Edward P. Vilas and Elias H. Bottum, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Seventh circuit. Denied. See 30 C. C. A. 193, 86 Fed. 463. MITCHELL v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF CHICAGO. (May 15, 1899.) No. 805. Theodore M. Maltbie, for petitioner. William C. Case, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the second circuit. Granted. MOFFETT, HODGKINS & CLARKE CO. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER et al. (February 27, 1899.) No. 720. Thomas H. Carter and Louis Marshall, for petitioner. John F. Kinney, for respondents. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Second circuit. Granted. MORRIS et al. v. STEWART et al. (November 7, 1898.) No. 463. Charles H. Aldrich, for petitioners. Samuel P. McConnell, H. M. Pollard, and Horace K. Tenney, for respondents. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Seventh circuit. Denied. See 32 C. C. A. 7, 88 Fed. 461; 32 C. C. A. 203, 89 Fed. 290. MUTUAL RESERVE FUND LIFE ASS'N V. DU BOIS. (October 17, 1898.) No. 330. J. B. Foraker, for petitioner. R. E. McFarland, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Ninth circuit. Denied. See 29 C. C. A. 354, 85 Fed. 586. OVERWEIGHT COUNTERBALANCE ELEVATOR CO. v. IMPROVED ORDER OF RED MEN'S HALL ASS'N. (May 15, 1899.) No. 706. Frederic D. McKenney and W. H. H. Hart, for petitioner. M. A. Wheaton, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Ninth circuit. Denied. See 94 Fed. 155. PELZER v. HORN & BRANNEN MFG. CO. (February 27, 1899.) No. 690. Richard N. Dyer, for petitioner. Hector T. Fenton, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Third circuit. Granted. P. LORILLARD CO. v. PEPER. (October 31, 1898.) No. 418. M. B. Philipp and Frederic D. McKenney, for petitioner. Smith P. Galt, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Eighth circuit. Denied. See 30 C. C. A. 496, 86 Fed. 956. RHODES et al. v. MASON et al. (February 27, 1899.) No. 676. Harvey D. Goulder and F. H. Canfield, for petitioners. C. E. Kremer, for respondents. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Sixth circuit. Denied. ROBERTS v. UNITED STATES ex rel. VALENTINE. (October 17, 1898.) No. 312. The Attorney General, Henry E. Davis, and D. W. Baker, for petitioner. B. E. Valentine, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the court of appeals of the District of Columbia. Granted. ROEHM v. HORST et al. (January 23, 1859.) No. 677. R. C. Dale and Samuel Dickson, for petitioner. Frank P. Prichard, for respondents. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Third circuit. Granted. RUSSELL v. STEARNS et al. (October 17, 1898.) No. 410. Henry M. Campbell, Ephraim Banning, and Thomas A. Banning, for petitioner. R. A. Parker and C. F. Burton, for respondents. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Sixth circuit. Denied. See 29 C. C. A. 121, 85 Fed. 218. SAVILLE v. AMERICAN SUGAR-REFINING CO. (January 30, 1899.) No. 687. J. Parker Kirlin, for petitioner. Harrington Putnam, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Second circuit. Denied. SAXLEHNER v. EISNER & MENDELSON CO. SAME v. SIEGEL-COOPER CO. SAME v. GIES. SAME v. MARQUET. SAME V. NIELSON. (March 6, 1899.) Nos. 712–716. Joseph H. Choate, Arthur v. Briesen, and Antonio Knauth, for petitioner. Charles G. Coe and Edmund Wetmore, for respondents. opinion. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Second circuit. Granted. See 33 C. C. A. 291, 91 Fed. 536. No |