XI. Chapter Parliamentary Elections Redistribution Bill, 1885, which enacted that the receipt of medical poor law relief should not disqualify a voter, the Commons agreed to that amendment, and passed a bill which effected the object of that provision. In session 1899 the second reading of the Seats for Shop Assistants (Scotland) Bill, which had passed the Commons, was put off for six months by the Lords. A similar bill for England and Ireland was passed by the Commons, and sent to the Lords, by whom it was extended to Scotland by means of an amendment, to which the Commons agreed.2 and Com The Lords' A method of procedure, moreover, has been adopted, Lords' mons' prici- with the sanction of both houses, by which these rules are leges, see p. 574. Journals inspected. partially disregarded. When the Lords, out of regard for A proceeding somewhat similar may arise, when a bill The Medical Relief Disqualification Removal Bill, 1885, 140 C. J. 317; 298 H. D. 3 s. 1590. 2 154 C. J. 386. aside. Lords search votes. XI. is returned from the Lords to the Commons, with amend- Chapter If a bill has been postponed or laid aside in the House Commons' of Commons, the Lords have sometimes appointed a committee to search the Votes and Proceedings of the Commons, and may, if they think fit, introduce another bill, and send it to the Commons.2 Proroga tion to renew bills. Amending same ses sion. But in all the preceding cases, the disagreement of the two houses is only partial and formal, and there is no difference in regard to the entire bill. If the second or third reading of a bill sent from one house to the other be deferred for three or six months, or if it be rejected, the bill cannot be revived in the same session. Hence, in 1707, Parliament was prorogued for a week, in order to admit the revival of a bill which had been rejected by the Lords; and in 1831, Parliament was prorogued from the 20th Effect of a October to the 6th December, in order to bring in the third tion, see Reform Bill.4 3 By a rule, annulled by 13 & 14 Vict. c. 21, a second bill, Acts of the at variance with the provisions of a bill passed during the same session, could not be introduced; and thus, in 1721, a prorogation for two days was resorted to, in order to enable Acts relating to the South Sea Company to be passed, contradictory to clauses contained in another Act of the same session.5 Proposals for sus proroga p. 44. bills sus Proposals have been made for a provision, either by statute Private or by standing orders, for the suspension of bills, from one pended, see resuming session to another, or for resuming proceedings upon such chap. xxix. pending or bills. bills, notwithstanding a prorogation. These schemes have 191 C. J. 777. 810; 100 ib. 664. Coxe's Walpole, 8; 2 Hatsell, 127. XI. Chapter legislature from disturbing the constitutional law by which parliamentary proceedings are discontinued by a prorogation.1 1 Earl of Derby's Parliamentary Proceedings Adjournment Bill, 1848, 98 H. D. 3 s. 329. 981. 1255; 99 ib. 246; 100 ib. 131; Report of Commons' Committee on Public Business, 1848; Report on Lords' Committee on Public Business, 1861; Report of Commons' Committee on Business of the House, 1861; Marquess of Salisbury's Parliamentary Proceedings Bill, 1869, 194 H. D. 3 s. 588; again, 7th May, 1883, 279 ib. 2; Report of Joint Committee on Despatch of Business in Parliament, 1869; Reports of Commons' Committees on Public Business, 1878, and on abridged procedure in 1890 [No. 298]. In session 1903, provision was made for resuming the proceedings on the Port of London Bill as reported from the Joint Committee, in the following session. A resolution for the resumption of proceedings on the bill was agreed to in the following session, but further progress was not made with the bill, 159 C. J. 181. CHAPTER XII. RULES OF DEBATE. Chapter Table of Contents, see Intro Manner of In the House of Lords, pursuant to standing order No. 25, duction. speaking. a peer addresses his speech "to the rest of the lords in Reading speeches. general." In the Commons, a member addresses the In both houses every member who speaks, rises in his 1 1 C. J. 272. 494; 7 H. D. 208; 83 ib. 3 s. 1169. 1281; 122 Parl. Deb. 4 s. 554; see also Lord Colchester's Diary, ii. 60. 432; 223 H. D. 3 s. 178; 235 ib. 773. Although on one occasion, during the debate on the Household Franchise Bill, 1873, a letter from Mr. Gladstone was read to the house, containing statements regarding the bill under discussion (217 H. D. 3 s. 842-844), when it was proposed, in like manner, to use in debate a letter from Mr. Gladstone touching the order division, see Customs and Inland Revenue (No. p. 357. 2) Bill, 1885, the Speaker, in private consultation, expressed his disapproval, pointing out that the proceeding would be an attempt to carry on debate by proxy; and deference was observed to the Speaker's opinion. 289 Parl. Deb. 4 ş. 546. 3 Lord Wynford, 64 L. J. 167; Mr. Wynn, 67 H. D. 3 s. 658. Questions proposed by the Speaker sitting owing to illness, 121 C. J. 197. Chapter during a division, when the doors are closed.1 A member Question proposed from the chair, see p. 286. For the call on members to move amend ments, see P. 610. Debate arises when a question has been proposed by the Time of speaking. Speaker, and before it has been fully put. In the House of Lords, under standing order No. 30, "when a question hath been entirely put by the Speaker, no lord is to speak against the question before voting;" and a question being entirely put implies that the voices have also been given. In the Commons, no member may speak No member to speak to any question after the same has been fully put by the after a Speaker; and a question is fully put when he has taken question the voices both of the ayes and of the noes.8 fully put. titled to Lords. From the limited authority of the Speaker of the House Who enof Lords, in directing the proceedings of the house, and in speak. maintaining order, the right of a peer to address their In the lordships depends solely upon the will of the house. When two rise at the same time, unless one immediately gives way, the house call upon one of them to speak; and if each be supported by a party, there is no alternative but a division. Thus, on the 3rd February, 1775, the Earl of Dartmouth and the Marquis of Rockingham both rising to speak, it was resolved, upon question, that the former "shall now be heard."4 If the lord chancellor rises from the woolsack to address the house, it is customary to give him precedence over other peers who may rise at the same time.5 In the Commons, when two or more members rise to The Speaker's speak, the Speaker calls on the member who, on rising in call. 1 20th April, 1883, 278 H. D. 3 s. 854; 2nd Sept. 1886, 308 ib. 1165; 7th June, 1904, 135 Parl. Deb. 4 s. 1024. 2246 H. D. 3 s. 1363. Speaking from the galleries is inconvenient, and rarely resorted to. 312th May, 1606, " Any man may speak after the affirmative and before the negative." Also 40 H. D. 79. Speaker's ruling, 3rd May, 1819, that debate could not be reopened after he had fully put the question, 34 L. J. 306; see also 18 H. D. 5 Debate on Roman Catholic Relief Bill, 3rd April, 1829, when the lord chancellor and Lord Kenyon rose together. |