 A prohibition simply upon the use of property for purposes that are declared, by valid legislation, to be injurious to the health, morals, or safety of the community, cannot, in any just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the...  Annual Report - 121 페이지저자: New Jersey. State Department of Health - 1902전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1912 - 800 페이지
...be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for the purposes that are declared, by valid legislation,...community, cannot, in any just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1951 - 840 페이지
...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...community, cannot, in any just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in... | |
 | 1892 - 554 페이지
...anthorities; but nevertheless we cannot forbear qnoting from the opinion in Mugler v. Kantns, supra: "A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in the control or use of his property for lawful purposes,... | |
 | 1888 - 1450 페이지
...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...community, cannot, in any just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in... | |
 | 1888 - 1462 페이지
...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...purposes that are declared, by valid legislation, to Ьеда injurious to the health, morals, or safety of the community, cannot, in any justg sense, be... | |
 | 1912 - 1170 페이지
...court held that a prohibition elmply upon the use of property for purposes declared by the Legislature to be injurious to the health, morals, or safety of..."cannot, in any Just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the public benefit" (123 US 668, 669, 8 Sup. Ct. 301, 31 L. Ed. 205),... | |
 | Henry William Blair - 1887 - 770 페이지
...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...community, cannot in any just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in... | |
 | 1888 - 892 페이지
...citizen uses his property for certain forbidden purposes which are injurious to the public interests. " A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...community, cannot in any just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in... | |
 | 1888 - 494 페이지
...compensating them for the diminution in its value resulting from such prohibitory enactments. A prohibition upon the use of property for purposes that are declared...to the health, morals, or safety of the community, is not an appropriation of property for the public benefit, in the sense in which a taking of property... | |
| |
