Depository institutions deregulation act of 1979: hearings before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-sixth Congress, first session, on S. 1347 ....
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Subcommittee on Financial Institutions
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979
다른 사람들의 의견 - 서평 쓰기
서평을 찾을 수 없습니다.
기타 출판본 - 모두 보기
ability action addition Administration agencies allow assets authority balances Bank Board believe bill billion bonds Chairman changes commercial banks Committee compete competitive concerned Congress consumer continue cost credit unions demand deposit depository institutions differential earnings economic effect elimination existing Federal Home Loan Federal Reserve Federal Reserve Board financial institutions funds higher Home Loan Bank housing impact important increase individuals industry inflation interest investment issue legislation lending less LIBRARY OF CONGRESS limited loan associations market rates means mortgage offer passbook percent period permit points powers present President problem programs proposed question rate control recent recommendations Regulation Q regulatory requirements response result S&Ls savings accounts savings and loan savings banks securities Senator Senator CRANSTON share draft small saver thrift institutions tion transactions accounts Treasury types usury
89 페이지 - I welcome this opportunity to present the views of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on S.1347, "The Depository Institutions Deregulation Act of 1979.
64 페이지 - Banks and commercial banks, and (3) to such extent as the Board may so approve, such obligations, including such special obligations, of the United States, a State, any territory or possession of the United States, or a political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing, and bankers' acceptances, as the Board may approve.
163 페이지 - Funds deposited or held in trust by the bank awaiting investment shall be carried in a separate account and shall not be used by the bank in the conduct of its business unless it shall first set aside in the trust department United States bonds or other securities approved by the Federal Reserve Board.
66 페이지 - Moreover, by reducing depository institutions' ability to compete for funds, ceilings subject such institutions to significant periods of disintermediation whenever market interest rates are cyclically high. However, while the elimination of deposit rate ceilings is by itself highly desirable, this process must be a gradual one. Many of the factors that caused Congress to establish the framework for coordinated rate ceilings in 1966 are still at work. Thrift institutions, because of constraints on...
1 페이지 - Dirksen Senate Office Building, Senator Alan Cranston (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Present: Senators Cranston, Dixon, Sasser, Sanford, and D'Amato.
67 페이지 - Government securities. These instruments are broadly designed to key permissible deposit rates of return to the market and the Board sees no reason for including them under the proposed legislation. Indeed, under the scheduled phaseout/ ceilings on MMC's would quickly rise above the rates on corresponding Treasury instruments— which is tantamount to removing ceilings on these deposits and ignoring the problems of the transition period which otherwise have been so carefully addressed in the bill.
145 페이지 - Nation's financial institutions, including commercial banks, savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, and credit unions.
64 페이지 - Act shall maintain the aggregate amount of its assets of the following types at not less than such amount as, in the opinion of the Board, is appropriate: (1) cash, (2) to such extent as the Board may approve for the purposes of this section, time and savings deposits...
67 페이지 - ... broadened asset powers, portfolio returns at thrifts might not rise as rapidly as deposit costs— leading to serious earnings squeezes at a sizable number of individual institutions. Prudence could suggest delaying an increase in ceiling rates at one or more points in the transition period to give portfolio returns a chance to catch up to deposit costs.